Forget the Russians: It’s the Federal Reserve Seeking to Meddle in Our Elections

donnay

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
42,534
Forget the Russians: It’s the Federal Reserve Seeking to Meddle in Our Elections

Forget the Russians: It’s the Federal Reserve Seeking to Meddle in Our Elections

written by ron paul monday september 2, 2019

Ron Paul - Forget the Russians: It’s the Federal Reserve Seeking to Meddle in Our Elections
IMAGE CREDITS: CAROLINE BREHMAN/CQ ROLL CALL.

The US Constitution never granted the federal government authority to create a central bank. The Founders, having lived through hyperinflation themselves, understood that government should never have a printing press at its disposal. But from the very beginning of America’s founding, the desire for a crony central bank was strong.

In fact, two attempts were made at creating a permanent central bank in America prior to the creation of the Fed. Fortunately, the charter for The First Bank was allowed to expire in 1811, and President Andrew Jackson closed down the Second Bank in 1833.

But, unfortunately, a third attempt was successful and the Federal Reserve was unconstitutionally created by Congress in 1913. Americans have been living under a corrupt and immoral monetary system ever since. The Federal Reserve is the printing press that has financed the creation of the largest government to ever exist. Endless welfare and endless military spending are both made possible by the Federal Reserve. The Fed can just print the money for whatever the US establishment wants, so those of us who long for a Constitutional and limited government have few tools at our disposal.

Despite all the propaganda claiming “independence,” the Fed has always been a deeply political institution. Because the Fed is a government-created monopoly with key government-appointed employees, its so-called “independence” is a mere fiction. However, the US Congress created the Fed with legislation; it can also abolish the Fed with legislation.

Last week, the facade of Federal Reserve “independence” was dealt a severe blow. Ironically, the person who broadcast to the world that the Fed is anything but “independent” was ex-New York Fed President Bill Dudley. Dudley wrote that, “Trump’s re-election arguably presents a threat to the United States’ and global economy, and if the goal of monetary policy is to achieve the best long-term economic outcome, the Fed’s officials should consider how their decisions would affect the political outcome of 2020.”

The timing of Dudley’s threats to use Fed monetary policy to affect the outcome of a US election couldn’t come at a more striking time. After all, for more than two solid years Americans have been bombarded with fabricated stories about Russians rigging our elections. And yet here is a Federal Reserve official threatening to do the same exact thing – but this time for real!

Whether it’s the mainstream media, the CIA, the FBI, or now the Federal Reserve, more and more Americans are waking up to the fact that there is a Deep State in America and its interests have nothing to do with American liberty. In fact, our liberty is what the Deep State wants to abolish.

When it comes to the Federal Reserve, I stand firmly by my conviction that it needs to be audited and then ended as soon as possible.

America’s Founders were not perfect. They were human beings just as capable of error as we are. But they had a remarkable understanding of the ideas of liberty. They understood that liberty cannot exist with a government that has access to a printing press. Sound money and liberty go hand-in-hand. If we want to enjoy the blessings of Liberty, we must audit and then end the Federal Reserve!
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive...l-reserve-seeking-to-meddle-in-our-elections/
 
Maybe the Fed should surrender independence and inflate the money supply as much as the President wants and bail him out of the slowing economy caused by his trade wars? Or not inflate the money supply and be accused of trying to get Trump out of office? They will be called biased no matter what they do.
 
Maybe the Fed should surrender independence and inflate the money supply as much as the President wants and bail him out of the slowing economy caused by his trade wars? Or not inflate the money supply and be accused of trying to get Trump out of office? They will be called biased no matter what they do.

They should be audited--they control too much power.
 
Maybe the Fed should surrender independence and inflate the money supply as much as the President wants and bail him out of the slowing economy caused by his trade wars? Or not inflate the money supply and be accused of trying to get Trump out of office? They will be called biased no matter what they do.
They wouldn't be called anything if they didn't exist.
 
''...audited and then ended...'' Ron Paul

This is the only man today that I could see supporting wholeheartedly 2020, shame he won't
run .
 
They wouldn't need to seize it, they did that when they wanted to stop using it as money.

They did it when they didn't have enough. And today the demands for money are greater and the supply of gold they have isn't. At the current market price of gold, we don't have enough to cover the trade deficit alone. Maybe just this year's interest on the debt.
 
Last edited:
They don't have to have all the money.:facepalming:

At current market prices, the value of the US Government gold would almost pay for this year's interest on the debt. That is it. If they want to use gold for money, they are going to need a lot more of it (which is one reason that isn't going to happen). A bit over $300 billion worth. US GDP is about $19 trillion.
 
Last edited:
At current market prices, the value of the US Government gold would almost pay for this year's interest on the debt. That is it. If they want to use gold for money, they are going to need a lot more of it (which is one reason that isn't going to happen). A bit over $300 billion worth. US GDP is about $19 trillion.
The price of gold would change if they used it for money (they could set it at whatever they wanted once) and they can tax people to get the money they need.
 
The price of gold would change if they used it for money (they could set it at whatever they wanted once) and they can tax people to get the money they need.

I thought you were against taxes?

(they could set it at whatever they wanted once

So the government should determine the value of a commodity instead of the market.
 
I thought you were against taxes?
LOL
That's weak, I have consistently argued against anarchists and discussed the best way to tax people to support the legitimate facets of government.



So the government should determine the value of a commodity instead of the market.
Government should define a dollar as X amount of gold or silver and leave it there, the market would determine how much of everything else that amount of gold or silver would buy.
 
If congress was in charge of it, maybe they wouldn't inflate the supply just to screw with Trump.

Maybe they would inflate it so they could spend as much as they want. Neither party shows much fiscal restraint these days.
 
Back
Top