- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 64,272
$615,000 to fly 50 migrants.
This is DeSantis using state money to make political ads.
Infiltration and sabotage 101. Make arguments that should resonate with the target audience.
$615,000 to fly 50 migrants.
This is DeSantis using state money to make political ads.
$615,000 to fly 50 migrants.
This is DeSantis using state money to make political ads.
Umm, you do realize it's the same Marxist media that's giving DeSantis all the coverage too right?
Let's look at it from the elitist standpoint for a second. Imagine you're a stock broker. You have busted your tail for years. Stayed awake for weeks at a time on meth binges doing research so you could pick the best stocks for your portfolio. You made some good decisions took some big risks. So you deserve big rewards right? Most of your coworkers have overdosed or blew their brains from the stress.
So why can't you have a place away from it all where you don't have to deal with the lower classes (unless they are doing your yard work)?
Why can't you have a place where you can walk down the street and not be harassed by panhandlers?
I know if I was rich I would move to a very secluded place away from it all. So why can't the people on Martha's Vineyard have that? Instead some governor trolls your community. Why are people such haters?
If I was a Florida citizen I'd vote for more of this.
If there was "chip in" available, I'd thrown in my own money for this.
So you are just like everyone else? Move the "problem" somewhere away from you. The "chip in" idea you are wasting your money. You would be better off buying a scratch ticket or placing a bet on a +10000 underdog. At least then you could feed off the hopium until your team loses or none of your scratch tickets win.
So you are just like everyone else? Move the "problem" somewhere away from you.
No, I am not like everybody else.
I say mobilize three brigades of armed citizen militia to the border, and issue orders to shoot to kill anybody crossing in illegally.
Problem solved.
But nobody has the stomach for that, so in the short term, yes, of course, move the problem somewhere else.
When you take out the household trash, do you pay somebody else to take it far away from you, or do you toss it in the front yard or in the woods?
I didn't want the invasion, I do not support the invasion, so, if the invaders end up somewhere "away from me", so be it.
That they are being sent to Marxist progs communities that do want the invasion to continue, is proper and just.
I ain't Everybody.
A Political Stunt,,with a Valid Point..
Perhaps it will makesomepeopleThinkACCLIMATE.
FIFY.
Another example:
TSA --> Global Entry --> CLEAR (the new family plan!)
Perhaps you are not watching the unglued hissy-fits. I am amused.
Come on, [MENTION=982]pcosmar[/MENTION], you know how well-informed I am about such things, and how well I read between the lines - not to mention my firm position on standing on principles.
How would you feel if they shipped them on the tax-payer-dime to your town, just to prove a point? Or would that be different?
I am not amused by any of this. It's sickening, actually.
How would you feel if they shipped them on the tax-payer-dime to your town, just to prove a point? Or would that be different?
Fact,,Gonna be on the Taxpayer Dime Regardless.
and just to be Clear..the only other option is Machine-gunning Unarmed Invaders at the Border.
There is a Massive push this way. A Wall was not a Bad Idea..But that should have been just the start.
The ones dropped off at Kamilla's House was especially Humorous right behind her "Secure Border" speech.
He's right, you know.
Everybody here understands problem-->reaction-->solution. But it's amazing how well camouflaged it all becomes when it's problem created by one party-->reaction-->solution instigated by the other party. Suddenly everyone's fine with the Constitution going out the window--temporarily, they think. Then later they wonder why they can't have nice things.