Goldwater Conservative
Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
- Messages
- 1,783
Okay, I really should have read the rest of this thread before posting the first time. After reading up on it, Paul voted against every such proposal that actually came up for a vote. It seems he only made this proposal as a way to make the amendment more acceptable from a federalist perspective... although making it more acceptable seems counterintuitive, especially since even if something more extreme passed Congress, it's probably unlikely that 38 states would also pass it.
Anyway, my support for him had gone from 99% to 98%, but now it's back to where it was.
Anyway, my support for him had gone from 99% to 98%, but now it's back to where it was.