First you pay more for gasoline, now get ready to pay more for electricity

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,708
Biden’s EPA Vows to Draft Sweeping Power Plant Rules Despite SCOTUS Review

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/11/03/bidens-epa-power-plant-rules-scotus/

PENNY STARR 3 Nov 2021

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said on Tuesday it will move forward with drafting sweeping rules targeting greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to take up a lawsuit challenging the federal government’s authority to heavily regulate the nation’s energy sector.

The lawsuit focuses on 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d), a provision allowing the EPA to issue rules — including some that could remake the nation’s electricity grids and unilaterally decarbonize virtually any sector of the economy — “without any limits on what the agency can require so long as it considers cost, non-air impacts,” and the nation’s energy requirements.

“EPA will continue to move forward and use its statutory authority to be sure that we protect the public from harmful pollution, greenhouse gas pollution and pollution that contributes to the degradation of air quality,” Michael Regan said in an interview with Reuters.

“Irrespective [of what] Congress does, EPA will move forward with its statutory authority,” Regan said.


Reuters reported:

The EPA is working on a proposal to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants, a major source of greenhouse gases, after a Trump-era rule was struck down by a federal appeals court in 2019 as “arbitrary and capricious”.

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a bid by states, including coal producer West Virginia, and industry groups to limit federal power to use the landmark Clean Air Act to regulate carbon emissions from power plants.

Regan said he expects the court to back the EPA’s authority, and added that he also remains confident Biden can work with a divided Congress to pass important climate legislation.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey celebrated the High Court’s decision to take up the case.


Patrick Morrisey speaks to reporters after a debate in Morgantown, West Virginia, on November 1, 2018. (AP Photo/Raymond Thompson, File)

The Dominion Post reported on reactions from the state that would be heavily affected by new regulations:

The case stems from a 27-state case led by Morrisey against the Obama-era Clean Power Plan, which resulted in a stay of the plan by the Supreme Court in 2016. In 2019, the Trump EPA replaced it with the Affordable Clean Energy Rule, which established emissions guidelines for states to use when developing plans to limit carbon dioxide at their coal-fired power plants. States would have three years to submit plans, in line with other planning timelines under the Clean Air Act.

But in January of this year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the 2019 Affordable Clean Energy Rule. In the current petition, Morrisey and the other states say the D.C. Court wrongly used a portion of the Clean Air Act to grant the EPA even more sweeping powers.

“The stakes are certainly are very high,” Morrisey said. “Congress never gave EPA a blank check to address climate change.”

He said states should have a seat at the table when Congress considers fundamental and transformative policies.

The case is West Virginia v. EPA, No. 20-1530, before the United States Supreme Court.
 
I heard the EPA found a new power source.


AdorableDangerousIndigobunting-size_restricted.gif
 
Well, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it's going to get even worse. This article is about the generation side, but we're going to see it on the delivery side, too.

With inflation, the costs to deliver power is rapidly rising.

There is probably more nominal rigidity in electric delivery prices than almost any other industry which can keep prices down for awhile. Most utilities use union labor which require contract changes to raise wages and they usually require Commission-approved rate cases to raise utility rates. But those factors only slow the increases. Utilities are being faced with rising costs of materials and are being hit with the same supply chain issues as the rest of the country. Transformers, meters, and even conduit and wires are in short supply - at a time when more and more energy use is being converted to electric. With current delivery rates, the utilities will be feeling the crunch hard. You can expect them to speed up their plans to bring rate cases before the Commissions. Co-op price increases will happen even faster.

Bringing a rate case before a Commission is expensive. Utilities have to present their operating expenses and their returns and there is much scrutiny. Then, there is the political costs of raising rates while consumers are being hit with inflation everywhere else. These things take months to put together and resolve. Which is why most utilities only do them when it is urgent. Well, it's urgent. Most states have at least a few utilities and the rate cases are usually staggered. But now, there's going to be pressure to bring them all at once, further clogging the Commissions' dockets. It's going to get ugly. And if the rate cases are not approved, it's going to get even uglier! There's only so long that Electric Delivery Companies can operate at a loss. Governments can operate at a loss for decades. It seems like they're setting up a battle for a government take-over of electricity delivery. I mean, the government already regulates it to death, but imagine what it would look like if they ran it!!

These are the kinds of things that keep me up at night.
 
Back
Top