GunnyFreedom
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 32,882
If that's how supposed constitutionalists view the document, why should people like myself take it seriously at all? Wasn't the whole point that if something isn't clearly stated in the document, that the government doesn't have the authority to undertake such an action? Please educate me as to the differences between what you did in this post and what progressives argue with welfare and any number of government action to combat [insert problem here].
How exactly is "Congress shall have the power...To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." not clearly stated? It's in English, and the syntax is constructed simply enough. What's confusing about it?