People on this site seem to understand macro economic trends fairly well, but have terrible financial intelligence. When you're 18 years old, and you have some extra cash to invest, you buy ultra risky assets for the greatest possible return. When you're 62 years old, you buy ultra safe assets with virtually no return.
Its a very, very simple principle based on the fact that a middle class 18 year old is going to make $1000 thousands of times (and with high inflation maybe hundreds of thousands or millions of times) over their working life.
You don't need to worry about saving for retirement. That's utterly ridiculous.
Read Rich Dad, Poor Dad. Start doing some research on some ETFs and stocks you may want to buy. I recommend looking at precious metal mining companies, agricultural companies, and oil companies. If you accept the macro economics preached on this forum, then these are all great buys.
And, again, even if you lost 100% of that investment--which you won't investing in those sectors--that's $1000 of financial education that will probably serve you better than your $100,000 college education.
Thanks for schooling me on the same things I've said in literally hundreds of threads on this site.
I was merely commenting that silver, in the short term of one year, is not a solid saving apparatus. Likewise, stocks make a very similar bad savings scheme. Neither are for the short term, and he may very well need this money in the short term.
I agree absolutely that you start taking risks at a young age, which is why I'm so peeved when you have 18 year olds on this site trying to "protect their wealth against inflation." It doesn't make sense to "protect your wealth" at 18 years old, unless you intend on maintaining the same standard of living.
Besides, inflation trackers don't grow wealth. If you sock away even 25% of your income, after 40 years of working you'd have exactly 10 times your annual income (actually less due to the fact you'd earn more inflation-adjusted income due to experience). Try to retire on 10 times your annual income when the adage is a 4% taxfree return with no drawdown. That works out from going from a $50,000 a year income to a $20,000 a year income in retirement, assuming you save 25% per year for 40 years.
Saying that only silver and gold are savings is pure reckless in the short term, knowing full well that we live in a dollar-denominated world. If gold and silver were readily used as currency, that much may be very true, but the dollar is the currency of the hour, and buying gold or silver does not, in any way, mean that the OP will have the same purchasing power today as he does a year from now.
Also, Rich Dad, Poor Dad is a shitty book. The book relies on growing your net-worth via one or many housing units and makes dangerous assumptions about the utility of equity that you build in your first home. While it is a very interesting read, it's no investing bible.