First Draft. NH Adv. by LLepard. Comments

Lawrence, I definitely agree that the part about evolution should be taken out. I will come across as too offensive to most christians. Not that I disagree with everything it said, but its too big a can to be opened by one paragraph. I am a christian by the way.
 
I still think a two minute tv ad is far more effective than something in the newspaper. NH residents have been deluged by politics to an unbearable degree. Expecting them to read something half as long as this is expecting too much.

I suggest two minutes dedicated to:

Ron Paul clearly and thoroughly stating his social security intentions

followed up by Ron Paul's stellar voting record presented by way of enthusiastic testimonials

finishing with video clips of several large out of state rallies.

People in New Hampshire need to see with their own eyes that Ron Paul is a winner across the nation.

Thank You.
 
Last edited:
This will greatly offend Christians, real or otherwise.

I believe the world was created according to Genesis, 6 literal days.

If I were to read that and just be a Christian who didn't know much about the candidates, I would throw the ad out and go support Huckabee just to spite you.

I'm dead serious. This does not belong in a political ad. I can not be clearer.



I mean no disrespect to you, you've done a lot of good for the grassroots with all the money you've donated and the USA Today Ad, but you are going to alienate every person who DOES believe in creationism/intelligent design.

I'm a Christian minister and I've never found anything in the Bible or elsewhere
that says God didn't enable evolution as a method for advancing species.

Can you state where you find that God cannot use evolution as a means of development?

All things are possible for God, except to lie.

I have no argument with accepting God's ability to utilize an evolutionary process.
 
Last edited:
This is a wonderful idea. I'm very glad that you've considered taking this step.

I am concerned that the add is too LONG. Perhaps we might consider cutting it about 1/10th of its current length?

Otherwise, this is a great effort.

Thanks,

James
 
After reading it through, the evolution part has to go.
I don't think Ron Paul believes in the theory of evolution.
 
I still think a two minute tv ad is far more effective than something in the newspaper. NH residents have been deluged by politics to an unbearable degree. Expecting them to read something half as long as this is expecting too much.

I suggest two minutes dedicated to:

Ron Paul clearly and thoroughly stating his social security intentions

followed up by Ron Paul's stellar voting record presented by way of enthusiastic testimonials

finishing with video clips of several large out of state rallies.

People in New Hampshire need to see with their own eyes that Ron Paul is a winner across the nation.

Thank You.
I thought that also. I was thinking about adds on Movie Theater, but I have no Idea how to do that.

People have no choice but to watch it.

But kudos anyways for doing the letter
 
OK, here is where we are right now.

It is long.

It will be full page.

There will be bolding, set outs and text changes.

It is kind of hard to read without all the formatting. I will try to get a pdf up later.

If you have time take a look and make suggestions.

Thanks.

Larry

I'm at work right now so I'll read through the whole thing tonight and make comments.

The idea however is genius. An ad that looks like an article. That reads like an article.

It needs graphics. I suggest the graph showing Ron Paul's fundraising vs others(q1-q4) here:
http://thecaseforronpaul.com/images/TC Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4.png

If its full page it should have 3 or so images(1 graph, 2 images).

Do you have a paper that will take an ad that looks like their articles?

Some bolded parts/quotes to break it up are essential. It should read easily and quickly- Just like a headline story.

I don't know that a full page is nescessary for this. 2 images(1 graph, 1 RP image) and a half page 'article' would be more than sufficient, and might actually go over better- Reads like an article, isn't imposing like a monster.
 
I'm a Christian minister and I've never found anything in the Bible or elsewhere
that says God didn't enable evolution as a method for advancing species.

Can you state where you find that God cannot use evolution as a means of development?

All things are possible for God, except to lie.

I have no argument with accepting God's ability to utilize an evolutionary process.

7 days. Stated multiple times and in multiple places with no hint that they might have any other meaning than that of a normal day.

This isn't the place to discuss this. The opinion seems to be that the message about evolution/creation should go. I concur with that- it just isn't a hot topic for many people. Just a joke.
 
Larry, that thing about Bush saying the Constitution was a "piece of paper" was debunked.
 
I agree with the "too long" sentiment also. I have a long attention span and might have a hard time getting through it myself. I know this is from your heart and it's hard to edit somethng that is from the heart but.....

I would cut it in 1/2 Larry.
 
Last edited:
OK, here is where we are right now.

It is long.

It will be full page.

There will be bolding, set outs and text changes.

It is kind of hard to read without all the formatting. I will try to get a pdf up later.

If you have time take a look and make suggestions.

Thanks.

Larry

In particular, do you think I should leave this part in or take it out. It is how I feel. But Linda thinks we lose voters. Thoughts?

. Then there is another republican candidate who doesn't believe in evolution, and literally believes the world was created in six days. If we are going to replay the Monkey/Scopes trial at the Presidential level, we are surely lost. Anyone who does not believe in the theory of evolution, as proven by science, is immediately disqualified by me as not being capable of critical thought. I am not saying people are not allowed to think "magically", I am just saying that I do not want one of these people running my country.[Linda comment (I’d take it all out and not even go there—assuming your goal is to help Ron get elected. Plus the copy just flows better into your next statement with it out.)

BREAK

Paid Political Message

Why did I spend $85,000 to support Presidential Candidate Ron Paul? Because I care about my children and your children.

Lawrence W. Lepard, American Citizen.


Recently,I reached into my own pocket and placed a full page ad in USA Today supporting the candidacy of Congressman Ron Paul. Why did I spend my hard-earned dollars on such an ad? I will tell you. Because Ron Paul is different from every other individual who carries the title "politician." He is truly a public servant. A "Mr. Smith goes to Washington" type of guy. No vested interest will support him, but I will. (I strongly believe that at this critical time we have a dire need for honest leadership in this country.
As Americans, we stand at an important crossroads in our history. We need to make a decision as to what we want America to represent, and to become. History will record the outcome of our decision. If we make the wrong choice, many more innocent people will die, and history will not be kind. As I say to my closest friends, I do not want to have to explain to my grandchildren that I stood silent as others destroyed this country.
Let me state it clearly. The America that I grew up in
believed in the rule of law, not the rule of men.
The America that I grew up in believed in telling the truth. The America that I grew up in believed in following Judeo-Christian values, and yet made room for those of different faiths and backgrounds. The America I grew up in had a religious flavor, but we were wary of those who wore their religion on their sleeves. The America that I grew up in believed in the golden rule: treat people the way we would like them to treat us. The America that I grew up in believed that you did not lie, cheat or steal. The America that I grew up in believed in the inherent goodness of most men, but recognized that evil exists.
Nevertheless, the America that I grew up in did not believe in an eye for an eye. It believed in protecting oneself from evil, but in the process of doing so we were cautioned not to become what we were protecting against.
In short, the America that I grew up in was a place where one could be proud of one’s country, and thankful to the men and women who had sacrificed so much in the past to give us this heritage.
I wake up today as a 50 year old husband and father of three, and I wonder where that America has gone. I see a President who called the U.S. Constitution “just a piece of paper”. He replaced a President who blatantly lied to the American public. Admittedly, the lie was about something that was none of the public’s business. However, when a country is led by a liar, it lowers that country’s level of discourse and makes lying seem acceptable. It is not. Are these the best leaders this Country can produce? I see that second President’s wife running for President and claiming she will end the war, when she initially voted for the war, and recently voted for a resolution against Iran that makes another war more likely. Do Americans really believe she will act in our best interests given all the money she has received from lobbyists and the military industrial complex? Do Americans really believe she will end the war, as she now has begun claiming in her political advertisements? Or is this just a tactic to gain anti-war votes now that Obama is breathing down her neck. Will her position on the war be like the story she told us about how she traded "cattle futures" so successfully?
I see the U.S. involved in an aggressive, undeclared war against a country that did not represent a threat to us in any way. We were lead into this war on the pretense of false and inaccurate information. The truth is, we are far less safe now than we were before we invaded Iraq. This war has created more emotionally charged enemies who have more reasons to attack us than ever before. Of course, the Administration and the media conveniently assure us that the “surge” is working. No surprise there, given that there is an election coming up.
Ron Paul voted against invading Iraq. Rather than attack an entire nation, he tried to convince Congress and our President to strategically target the terrorists responsible for 9/11. The current Administration has failed to capture and eliminate the criminals who perpetrated this crime against us. Those responsible are still at large, our borders are wide open, and our troops are spread thin all over the globe. We need a leader who will protect us with a strong national defense and keep us out of foreign entanglements that in the end, create more enemies than friends. We need a President who will put the national security of the American people, and the safety of our troops, before the interests of oil companies and the military industrial complex.
To date the outcome of this war is that between 100,000 and 1.0 million innocent people have died. These figures are between 30 and 300 times the number of people killed on 911. Do two wrongs make a right? Furthermore, the majority of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis. Not Iraqis. We are allies with Saudi Arabia and yet Saudi Arabia is far from being a democracy. Yet we went to war to create a democracy in Iraq and set an example for the Middle East.
The hypocrisy is staggering. The mistakes that were made are nearly criminal. Why anyone believes one thing that is said by the people who led us into this war is a mystery to me.
“We will be greeted as liberators.” Wrong. “Oil revenues will pay the cost.” Wrong. “A secular democracy will emerge and be an inspiration for other countries.” Wrong. The list of misjudgments goes on an on.
Were the civilian Iraqis killed by our preemptive war “collateral damage” or is that just a euphemism for murder? Has anyone taken the time to look at their pictures on the Web? I wonder how their relatives and friends feel about the United States? I wonder if they are more or less likely to become terrorists as a result of the actions of the United States. I see a country that has violated the Geneva Conventions. I see a country that has violated the Christian Doctrine of Just War. I see a country that has started a war that is illegal under international law. As President Eisenhower said, “Preventive war was an invention of Hitler. Frankly, I would not listen to anyone who seriously talked about such a thing”. I see a flock of Presidential candidates, most of whom voted for this war and many of whom believe “all options should be on the table” in dealing with Iran. For those who are not current on this subject, that language is code for: we should be prepared to attack Iran with conventional or nuclear weapons.
Think about that for a moment. Leaders in this Country are actually talking about using a nuclear weapon preemptively against a country that has not attacked us. Are they insane?
I hear Neocon pundits calling for the beginning of World War III. I see a Country that has suspended habeas corpus. I see a country that has stripped its citizens of the Constitutional protections against an overreaching government. I see a country that has sanctioned “rendition” which is just another term for the kidnapping of anyone, anywhere, throughout the world, and then spiriting them off to a remote location where they can be subject to “enhanced interrogation techniques,” which we are told are not torture. Another lie. I see a country that has engaged in torture. Hell, one leading Presidential candidate wants to “double Guantanamo” and thinks his sons’ campaigning for him is equivalent to serving in the military. Of course, he got a deferment to avoid serving in Vietnam. Other candidates for the highest office in this land are not any better. I see a war hero candidate who sings "bomb Iran" to the tune of The Beach Boy's song, Barbara Ann. How can he make light of killing people? Shame on you Senator. Of all people, you should know better. Joking about killing someone is a disgrace in my book. Then there is another republican candidate who doesn't believe in evolution, and literally believes the world was created in six days. If we are going to replay the Monkey/Scopes trial at the Presidential level, we are surely lost. Anyone who does not believe in the theory of evolution, as proven by science, is immediately disqualified by me as not being capable of critical thought. I am not saying people are not allowed to think "magically", I am just saying that I do not want one of these people running my country.[Linda comment (I’d take it all out and not even go there—assuming your goal is to help Ron get elected. Plus the copy just flows better into your next statement with it out.) ] Furthermore, I see a country where the top advocates of war have never fought in one. Worse yet, they sought and obtained deferments when others were fighting. You cannot make this stuff up. The irony is incredible. If, as I believe, you reap what you sow, - then the ultimate payback for these injustices will be staggering.

I see a Country that thinks that it owns and controls the world. I believe this is ethically wrong.
Furthermore, we cannot afford it, so even attempting to run the world is pointless. I see a country that thinks it should have bases in the Middle East for the next fifty years. I see a country where the dominant political party, the Neocons, believes the world is a dark and evil place. I believe the people who feel this way are projecting their own views onto the rest of the world. They need therapy. I see a country where the Government has adopted the Old Testament view of an eye for an eye. As Ghandi said, if we take this approach we will all end up blind.
In short, I wonder if America has lost its soul. Out of malfeasance, fear, ignorance, or incompetence we have implemented the wrong policies and taken the wrong course. Since this is true, then effectively the terrorists are winning. God surely has a great sense of humor. Irony abounds.
As citizens, each and every one of us is somewhat responsible for the acts of our government. All it takes for evil to flourish is for good people to do nothing. So, has America lost it soul: yes or no? I would submit that while the current U.S. Administration and the vast majority of the Senate and Congress have lost their souls, the American people have not. Nearly 70% of the American population is against this war, and yet the war goes on. The vast majority of the American people want peace. People know what is right, yet the government does the wrong thing. How can this be? We are supposed to be a government OF, FOR and BY the People. Are we? What do you think? Does our government really represent the American people? Do you think the U.S. government should kill innocent Iraqis or Iranians to make us safer? Would you advocate killing a man who lives down the street because you think he might do you harm in the future, even though he has done nothing to you yet?
I will say it right now, clearly and loud:

The huge disconnect between what a majority of this country wants and what our government is doing is the elephant in the room that no one will discuss.
I cannot in good conscience condone or support the policies of the Neocons, the military industrial complex, or the oil industry. I do not believe in “Full Spectrum Dominance”. I do not believe “We Are The Indispensable Nation”. I do not believe we are “History’s Actors.” I do not believe we can “Make Our Own Reality”. I do not believe we should be an Empire. I think we have great power and military superiority and we should use these abilities to protect ourselves. Furthermore, with these powers come enormous responsibility. We are a Constitutional Republic. I believe there is a power higher than my government and that the Founders drew upon this power when they drafted the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal.” That reads “all men.” Not “all Americans.” The Founders believed, as do I, that All men have God-given rights. Governments are made to protect these rights, not destroy them. Until recently, I believe the American government did a good job of protecting these rights for Americans. For many years now I believe the American government has used a different standard or play book when dealing with foreign countries and foreign citizens. But that is a story for a different essay.
If it sounds like I am mad, you’re right. I am mad as hell and I am not going to take it anymore. (Source: Howard Beale: Network)
I am mad that my money becomes worth less every year because the Federal Reserve can print money out of thin air. I am mad that the U.S. Government inflation statistics are a lie, thanks to Bill Clinton’s changing of the CPI calculation. I am mad that this change and the Federal Reserve have put the economy on a roller coaster leading to boom and bust cycles that benefit financiers at the expense of the middle class, retirees and the poor. I am mad that Wall Street titans and speculators have been rewarded while savers and honest labor have been punished. I am mad that honesty is considered quaint and naive by the political classes. I am mad at the arrogance of those who hold power in Washington, DC. I am mad that the actions of some men in my country have taken away the moral high ground that the U.S. used to occupy. I am mad that my tax dollars are used for weapons rather than for peaceful purposes. I do not want the blood of innocents on my hands. I do not agree with many of Michael Moore’s positions, but his statement “dude, I want my country back” resonates with me. I believe that it resonates with a large portion of the American voter base.
Individual Americans are great people. If 70% of them are opposed to the war, then there is still hope. Of course the mainstream media, the press and the vested industrial and political interests would have us all believe that we cannot make a difference. They say we need to listen to them as they tell us who the next President will be. We have to choose between the two war monger candidates they will serve up to us. We are told who the two front runners are, and we are discouraged from looking elsewhere. Why bother, they say? No one else even stands a chance. Maybe so, maybe not. This time I think they have gone too far. I would submit that the outcome of this election it is not so clear. The establishment dam has sprung a leak. The leak may be small now, but it is growing. It is growing exponentially. The word is spreading. The candidates who represent change are moving up. The candidates who represent the status quo are moving down (Rudy Guiliani and Hillary Clinton). Even Rudy is being forced to talk about what a great religion Islam is in order to soften his Norman Podhoretz inspired:” kill’em all, and let God sort them out message.”
The lines could not be more clearly drawn.
Ron Paul’s message is clear and beautiful and true. It resonates with people. When you hear it you say, “that’s right, that’s what I believe”.
This is why his poll numbers are rising faster than any other candidate. Yet, the media still ignores him or treats him poorly. It is beautiful irony that every attack on him only brings him more attention as intelligent Americans wonder, “who is this guy that everyone keeps attacking … I wonder if there is a reason?” They say he cannot win. They say he is a fringe candidate. They say he will lose big. I disagree. First, I think there is a very good chance he will be our next President. Second, I think he has won, even if he does not win. Why? Because he has put the Freedom message out there. It is like a virus. It is spreading. It cannot be stopped. I believe history will record the Ron Paul Freedom Movement as a seminal event in the history of U.S. politics.
It is an honor to support this man. We should be so lucky as to have him for our President.
Having said that, we could all help history along a little bit by supporting the Ron Paul campaign. My favorite movie is :It’s A Wonderful Life. To me, the message of that movie is that we all make a difference. Individually, none of us have the power of the Neocons and the political classes, but collectively they are supposed to work for us. If we self-organize and unite, we have them badly out numbered. They are terrified, believe me on this. And it is happening. The growth in this movement is amazing. We can and will win this struggle. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a defeatist or is working for the other side. I ran the USA Today Advertisement because I wanted to plant a seed and make a difference. WE ALL MAKE A DIFFERENCE. Every conversation, every person converted, every e-mail , every effort; it all counts. The internet is what has made it possible.
What a beautiful thing. The trend is really changing and it is fun to watch the old guard struggle as their fortress crumbles.
So what can you do?
Join our effort to elect Ron Paul as the next President of the United States. Spread the word that we have an opportunity to elect an honest statesman with an impeccable record of voting in line with our Constitution.
Donate to his campaign!
Each contribution represents another American who has said “enough is enough.”
Every contribution helps. $10 is not too little. On December 16th, our collective voices were heard when grassroots supporters for Ron succeeded in organizing the largest one-day fundraiser in political history. Over 58,000 ordinary Americans spoke with their wallets by donating more than $6 million dollars to the Ron Paul campaign in a single day. Together we are proving to be a force to be reckoned with.
Think about it. What is freedom worth? I would submit that it is priceless. If you care about the future of this country, I know that Ron Paul will not let you down. If you care about our troops, then you must vote for Ron Paul. He will bring them home to defend America instead of someone else’s country. Ron Paul has received more donations from active military personnel than any other candidate. Why do you think that is? Have you heard about it from the Mainstream Media? I think not.
This is it folks. A once in a lifetime opportunity. We may never see a candidate with more integrity, with a better message or track record.
Rarely has our country been so far off track. Our Founding Fathers pledged their lives, fortunes and sacred honors in order to establish this Nation. Perhaps we have taken for granted the risks they took and the sacrifices they made. But we are being called. We are being tested. How will we answer? Will we meet the test or will we fail? Each of us makes a difference.
So what are you going to do? Are you going to be a Loyalist or a Patriot? Are you going to storm the ramparts or huddle with the bourgeoisie?
Americans are brave people. I believe we can set this country back on the right track and that America will experience a renaissance of Peace, Freedom and Prosperity. Vote Ron Paul for President.
The danger to our Republic
is real. We must act now!
Remember, each one of us makes a difference. Please vote for Ron Paul in your state’s Republican Primary and encourage your friends and neighbors to do the same.
You can also learn more at
www.RonPaulLibrary.org
about Ron Paul”s positions on the
issues that most concern you.

Please don't take offense, we'll have to agree to disagree on this, but if I read that Ad before I knew much about Ron Paul, I would probably NEVER support him. That issue is somewhat important to me and many other Ron Paul supporters, you risk alienating many people with that. I think we all appreciate your sincere efforts.


On a side note, is that first part actually true?
:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(
 
Another thing I wanted to ask about was this quote,

I see a President who called the U.S. Constitution “just a piece of paper”

The ONLY place that verifies this is Capitol Hill Blue. Now I am not really sure if Bush really said that or not. There's lots of speculation on the internet about it.

What do you all know about Bush saying "It's just a god damned piece of paper"?
It is real or is it made up?

This is the story and only "source".
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml
 
Larry, I’m an acclaimed speaker, writer and editor.

This is a superb letter. I can imagine you presenting it in a large arena and the audience being held spellbound.

Because this letter comes straight from your heart, you must keep it as much as possible in just the way you’ve written it. I’ve only a handful of suggestions for change, but would be happy to fine-tooth the final version if you'd like to send it to me:

To date, [delete]the outcome of this war is that[/delete] between 100,000 and 1.0 million innocent people have died. These figures are between 30 and 300 times the number of people killed on [write out full date - there are Americans who don't know what '9/11' means]September 11, 2001[/date]. Do two wrongs make a right?

Furthermore, the majority of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis. Not Iraqis. We are allies with Saudi Arabia and yet Saudi Arabia is far from being a democracy. Yet we went to war to create a democracy in Iraq and set an example for the Middle East. The hypocrisy is staggering. The mistakes that were made are [delete]nearly[/delete] criminal. Why [ins]should[/ins] anyone [ins]we[/ins] believes [delete ‘s’] one thing that is said by the people who led us into this war[delete] is a mystery to me.[/delete]?

Then spread out these, each in its own paragraph:

“We will be greeted as liberators.” Wrong.

“Oil revenues will pay the cost.” Wrong.

“A secular democracy will emerge and be an inspiration for other countries.” Wrong.

The list of misjudgments goes on an[d] on.

Typo here:

I would submit that the outcome of this election [delete]it[/delete] is not so clear.
 
Llepard, first off, let me commend you on your spirit and actions. You humble me as a fellow supporter and yet know I would do more if I only could.

As far as this article goes, I'm going to have to go back and read it later. At first glance, it was too daunting for me to pursue -- even as a rabid Paul supporter; I can't imagine what a skeptic would think.

I think it needs to be trimmed down substantially. Please don't take this as a knock against you or your thoughts -- again, I haven't read them yet. But you're paying another good bit of money -- I'm assuming you're not just trying to preach to the choir here.

Short. Powerful. Resonant.

Great work.
 
7 days. Stated multiple times and in multiple places with no hint that they might have any other meaning than that of a normal day.

This isn't the place to discuss this. The opinion seems to be that the message about evolution/creation should go. I concur with that- it just isn't a hot topic for many people. Just a joke.

I'm sorry but you've evaded my question.

Where in the mention of 7 days, in the entire Bible itself, or anywhere else,
does it say that God created everything exactly as it is now and didn't implement an evolutionary process?
 
I'm a Christian minister and I've never found anything in the Bible or elsewhere
that says God didn't enable evolution as a method for advancing species.

Can you state where you find that God cannot use evolution as a means of development?

All things are possible for God, except to lie.

I have no argument with accepting God's ability to utilize an evolutionary process.

I'm a Christian minister and I've never found anything in the Bible or elsewhere
that says God didn't enable evolution as a method for advancing species.

Can you state where you find that God cannot use evolution as a means of development?

Genesis 2:17

“In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die”

When they ate the fruit, death entered the world. However, if evolution happened before all this, it would be a contradiction of scriptures. Death would've had to have entered before they ate the fruit. If evolution is true, then my Bible is flawed, corrupt, and I should go to Vegas and get as much sin as possible in.

However, evolution is not part of God's plan, if it was, He would be a most sick and repulsive God for creating this horrible idea of millions and millions of years of death and waste before "getting it right". No, He got it right the first time.

Young-Earth Creation. There's an obvious order, no one gets up and is shocked to see gravity in effect or clouds in the sky. Creation needs a Creator.

BTW to everyone else reading: This is my humble opinion. I'm not trying to run around these forums looking for arguments. I am responding to a question. That is it, I'm not trying to start any wars. Peace.

Sorry it took a while for my answer. If you want more info just google "sin" and "death" in blueletterbible or another bible search engine.
 
Is it true that Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution?
:(

There is such a thing as the theory of Evolutionary Creationism.

"Theistic evolution, less commonly known as evolutionary creationism,
is the general opinion that some or all classical religious teachings about God and creation are compatible
with some or all of the modern scientific understanding about biological evolution.

Theistic evolution is not a theory in the scientific sense,
but a particular view about how the science of evolution relates to some religious interpretations.

In this way, theistic evolution supporters can be seen as one of the groups who deny the conflict thesis
regarding the relationship between religion and science;
that is, they hold that religious teachings about creation and scientific theories of evolution need not be contradictory."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theistic_evolution
 
Last edited:
An ad is on television for a few seconds and then is gone. Many people would miss it completely and many people would tune it out mentally if they could hear it if their minds were occuppied elsewhere. Not everyone sits in front of the TV for hours. And many people will use commercial time to go for snacks.

Even for those who hear the ad, one's attention span is very short and one actually retains a minuscule of what one hears unless it is something that really grabs the listener.

Newspapers do still have the one big advantage of being tangible and can be read and re-read at will if one so chooses at one's leisure. I personally like to have hardcopy of something that really grabs my attention and when I find it online, I nearly always print it out for re-reading.

I think it is best to leave the Ron Paul television ads to the official campaign and use the newspapers for letters such as Mr. Lepard has written. I can honestly say that while perusing a newspaper, on occasion I have run across open letters and I am nearly always intrigued enough to read the open letter--at least for a few paragraphs to see what it is about. If it grabs my attention, I tend to finish the letter and even save it to re-read and share.

This aso suggest that written material in a paper needs to be very closely vetted and edited for content and demeanor, simply because it is hardcopy and not fleeting.

Just my thoughts.
 
Larry, I’m an acclaimed speaker, writer and editor.

This is a superb letter. I can imagine you presenting it in a large arena and the audience being held spellbound.

Because this letter comes straight from your heart, you must keep it as much as possible in just the way you’ve written it. I’ve only a handful of suggestions for change, but would be happy to fine-tooth the final version if you'd like to send it to me:



Then spread out these, each in its own paragraph:



Typo here:



I agree. Your writing speaks strongly about how much you care about this country and the best part is that this is UNIQUE.

(I agree with Linda and the quoted post above)
 
Back
Top