Ferguson just got more complicated...

[tangent4ronpaul]

Anonymous hackers to Ferguson police: ‘We are the law now’
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/21/anonymous-hackers-to-ferguson-police-we-are-the-la/

Two Twitter accounts belonging to the Ku Klux Klan have been taken over by the hacker collective known as Anonymous (logo pictured), after the white supremacist group threatened to use "lethal force" against looters and vandals in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson. (Twitter/Anonymous)

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/image/anonymousjpeg/#ixzz3JzJNVIWO
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Hackers with the group, Anonymous, sent a stark message to police in Ferguson, as well as to Ku Klux Klan members assembled at the scene, to be on guard — that any injuries to protesters will be duly noted.

“To the KKK and police: kkk-in-new-video-we-are-the-law-now/” target=”_blank”>Be peaceful or you will fee the consequences,” the hacking group said in a video reported by The Free Thought Project. “To the protesters: Do not be afraid. We are here for you and will protect and serve you. We are the law now.”

The video was actually a response to one sent out by Frank Ancona with the Traditionalist American Knights of the KKK that vowed to “hunt down” members of Anonymous, Raw Story reported.

In that video, the KKK warned the hackers: “You’ll be strung up next to the chimps. On display for the whole world to see. The Klan is to be feared, not threatened. Turn away or face the consequences.”

Anonymous and the KKK have been engaged in a public battle for some time. The hacking group took over the Klan’s Twitter account just recently, and revealed the names and addresses of KKK members living near Ferguson.

The hackers’ video then suggested the KKK refrain from aiding police with crowd control in Ferguson.

“If you attempt to aid the police, just know that there are more of us out there than there are of you,” the group said in its video, Raw Story reported. “But you will not know who we are. We are everywhere. We are among the protesters, and we are among you.”

and then there are the New Black Panthers, the FBI, DHS (at least 100 each), over 1,000 cops and the national guard...

-t

 

[tod evans]

 

[alucard13mm]

I kinda don't really see what is the big deal about Ferguson... There are far worse cop on civilian crimes that are more clear cut. This case is too muddy and unclear to determine who is at fault.

This guy's life and/or death is inconsequential compared to deaths from drones, other cop on civilian killings and other events that kills shit ton of people.

 

[phill4paul]

I kinda don't really see what is the big deal about Ferguson... There are far worse cop on civilian crimes that are more clear cut. This case is too muddy and unclear to determine who is at fault.

This guy's life and/or death is inconsequential compared to deaths from drones, other cop on civilian killings and other events that kills shit ton of people.

Tell that to the face of these people....

 

[Uriel999]

Sounds like all the departments at the FBI are not communicating....

 

[Ender]

I kinda don't really see what is the big deal about Ferguson... There are far worse cop on civilian crimes that are more clear cut. This case is too muddy and unclear to determine who is at fault.

This guy's life and/or death is inconsequential compared to deaths from drones, other cop on civilian killings and other events that kills shit ton of people.

Maybe because this community actually took a stand?

Also- all human life is precious- no loss is "inconsequential".

 

[jmdrake]

Tell that to the face of these people....

Tell me why their loss is somehow worse than hers.

Their son robbed someone. He was jaywalking when he got accosted by the police. If everything else those who are against the police say is true, that still doesn't change the fact that he could have totally avoided the situation. Yet Miriam Carey didn't do anything wrong except make a wrong turn and then panic and as a result she was shot in the back of the head execution style and there will be no riots for her. Why not?

There will be no riots for this baby either.

Burned beyond recognition by a SWAT no knock raid. Why aren't people up in arms about that?

There were no riots for this man either.

See...here's the deal. The media picks and chooses what things to make an "issue". So do the fake civil rights husksters (Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson). If they picked cases o police brutality where the victim had a clean record to get upset over, the average white person might actually start giving a crap. But they pick people like Trayvon Martin and Mike Brown to highlight. Folks with questionable backgrounds so they bubous Americanus can say "Oh he brought it on himself." (Granted there are some idiots that say that about Kelly Thomas, but they're idiots and beyond hope.)

 

[phill4paul]

Tell me why their loss is somehow worse than hers.

Their son robbed someone. He was jaywalking when he got accosted by the police. If everything else those who are against the police say is true, that still doesn't change the fact that he could have totally avoided the situation. Yet Miriam Carey didn't do anything wrong except make a wrong turn and then panic and as a result she was shot in the back of the head execution style and there will be no riots for her. Why not?

There will be no riots for this baby either.

Burned beyond recognition by a SWAT no knock raid. Why aren't people up in arms about that?

There were no riots for this man either.

See...here's the deal. The media picks and chooses what things to make an "issue". So do the fake civil rights husksters (Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson). If they picked cases o police brutality where the victim had a clean record to get upset over, the average white person might actually start giving a crap. But they pick people like Trayvon Martin and Mike Brown to highlight. Folks with questionable backgrounds so they bubous Americanus can say "Oh he brought it on himself." (Granted there are some idiots that say that about Kelly Thomas, but they're idiots and beyond hope.)

See..here's the deal. No taking of a life is inconsequential to those that love them. That was my point. My only point.

 

[Christian Liberty]

Tell that to the face of these people....

Here's the thing. If (and I realize this is a big if) Brown was actually being arrested for a real crime such as burglary, and if he did in fact try to pull a weapon on the police officer, I wouldn't blame Wilson for doing whatever he had to do to protect himself.

Mind you, I don't like police, but theft is not a victimless crime.

I don't know exactly what happened, which is why I haven't been commenting.

 

[Christian Liberty]

Tell me why their loss is somehow worse than hers.

Their son robbed someone. He was jaywalking when he got accosted by the police. If everything else those who are against the police say is true, that still doesn't change the fact that he could have totally avoided the situation. Yet Miriam Carey didn't do anything wrong except make a wrong turn and then panic and as a result she was shot in the back of the head execution style and there will be no riots for her. Why not?

There will be no riots for this baby either.

Burned beyond recognition by a SWAT no knock raid. Why aren't people up in arms about that?

There were no riots for this man either.

See...here's the deal. The media picks and chooses what things to make an "issue". So do the fake civil rights husksters (Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson). If they picked cases o police brutality where the victim had a clean record to get upset over, the average white person might actually start giving a crap. But they pick people like Trayvon Martin and Mike Brown to highlight. Folks with questionable backgrounds so they bubous Americanus can say "Oh he brought it on himself." (Granted there are some idiots that say that about Kelly Thomas, but they're idiots and beyond hope.)

Agreed. I think its purposeful that they pick the questionable backgrounds, actually. Call me a "conspiracy theorist" but that definitely makes things easier for the "pro-cop" people.

Did Michael Brown need to die? Did Trayvon Martin? I'm going to be honest and say I don't know. I'm not saying it can't be known, just that I am not currently informed of all the facts. I remember it seemed to me at the time that George Zimmerman was innocent, at least in so far as I think there was definitely reasonable doubt.

Wilson, as a cop, is on the wrong side, but that doesn't necessarily mean he was wrong here either. It depends on the facts.

On the other hand, I have no idea how anyone could defend the death of Kelly Thomas, or the baby who got grenaded... which is why they don't talk about those...

 

[phill4paul]

Here's the thing. If (and I realize this is a big if) Brown was actually being arrested for a real crime such as burglary, and if he did in fact try to pull a weapon on the police officer, I wouldn't blame Wilson for doing whatever he had to do to protect himself.

Mind you, I don't like police, but theft is not a victimless crime.

I don't know exactly what happened, which is why I haven't been commenting.

Here's the thing. I was only pointing out that the death of a parents child is hardly "inconsequential." For whatever reason.

I think it would probably be a good time for you to catch up on this case. Brown never had, nor was ever accused, of having a gun.

 

[cajuncocoa]

The Michael Brown case, just as the Trayvon Martin case before this, is not being played out as one of excessive police force against the general population....something we see every day in topics on this board.

It's being played out as excessive force by a white officer on a black victim...the media are playing the race card, deliberately playing emotions to get whites to take the side of the police officer in the case. As I see it, whites and blacks alike are falling for it.

 

[tod evans]

As I see it, whites and blacks alike are falling for it.

The proverbial fiddles......

 

[jonhowe]

Here's the thing. If (and I realize this is a big if) Brown was actually being arrested for a real crime such as burglary, and if he did in fact try to pull a weapon on the police officer, I wouldn't blame Wilson for doing whatever he had to do to protect himself.

Mind you, I don't like police, but theft is not a victimless crime.

I don't know exactly what happened, which is why I haven't been commenting.

Brown was not being arrested. Brown was not accused of burglary until well after his death. Brown did not have a weapon to pull?

Where are you getting this BS from??

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Here's the thing. If (and I realize this is a big if) Brown was actually being arrested for a real crime such as burglary, and if he did in fact try to pull a weapon on the police officer, I wouldn't blame Wilson for doing whatever he had to do to protect himself.

Mind you, I don't like police, but theft is not a victimless crime.

I don't know exactly what happened, which is why I haven't been commenting.

And that's the whole point, isn't it? The ones that get blown all out of proportion, eat up multiple news cycles over and over and over again, and trigger riots and looting and such are all vague and ambiguous.

the obvious ones don't get the attention, don't get the news cycles, and don't get the riots.

I don't necessarily know that it is intentional insofar as "making the police lives easier" but it MUST be intentional at least insofar as they feel they can make a larger profit off of the ambiguous ones. It's too obvious to NOT be intentional at least in one respect or another.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Brown was not being arrested. Brown was not accused of burglary until well after his death. Brown did not have a weapon to pull?

Where are you getting this BS from??

IIRC, some of the evidence eventually released in the case has indicated that the cop had communicated with the dispatcher about the strong arm incident before he saw him in the street. Part of his defense, of course.

 

[thoughtomator]

Sounds like all the departments at the FBI are not communicating....

Some people won't get that, but I did. Today's KKK and "Anonymous" are probably both FBI operations.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

I don't necessarily know that it is intentional insofar as "making the police lives easier" but it MUST be intentional at least insofar as they feel they can make a larger profit off of the ambiguous ones. It's too obvious to NOT be intentional at least in one respect or another.

Divide, distract, demonize.

Standard Marxist tactic, and the media is now dominated by those from the Marxist tradition. A case like this serves a dual purpose. It helps rating because it is sensational and they can draw it out for so long, and then there is the political tactic of divide and conquer.

There was a time in the past where they would be interested in making this about the Police or military (go back to the 60s), but now it just needs to be racial. They hold the reins of power now, so the Police will not be highlighted too much. Like the military, the Police are useful to those in power. Kissinger famously summarized that mindset with his quote "dumb, stupid animals to be used". Miriam Carey serves as another example. That case was so close to the seat of power that no criticism of the Praetorian guard was uttered.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Some people won't get that, but I did. Today's KKK and "Anonymous" are probably both FBI operations.

And the KKK plays perfectly into the divide, distract and demonize narrative.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Tell that to the face of these people....

Imagine what will be their reaction if US Congress gave standing ovasion to the cop who killed their son?