specsaregood
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 39,143
It was from the last 2 rounds of rioting in Ferguson. First there were a bunch of videos that non-locals posted going into Ferguson to riot and loot, then the looters arrested were all (except for 1 or 2) from out of town, and then there were interviews of people who were protesting but not rioting and they were locals, and then there was some investigative report that showed people coming in from out of town, rioting, and then leaving town. Add all those up and it adds up to "most of the rioters were not locals, most of the locals did not riot."
No, I don't have any links, just memory.
I'm not saying it isn't the case; but I doubt the claim's credibility. I'd wager the people making those claims, interviews and investigations benefit from pushing that claim. ie: people protesting don't want to be linked to rioters; so it makes sense the would try to claim they were from out of town. Besides, what does "non-local" mean? Ferguson is right in the middle of the greater st.louis metropolitan area. Is somebody that can take the metro bus from a different part of st.louis a "non-local"? somebody from right across the river in east st.louis? I don't think many of those looters have driven in from Chicago or Memphis.