Feds warn Texas not to enforce state-level immigration bill

Occam's Banana

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Messages
39,943
Biden administration warns Texas it will sue if state implements strict immigration law
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-immigration-law-sb4-justice-department-threatens-lawsuit/
{Camilo Montoya-Galvez | 28 December 2023}

The Biden administration on Thursday warned Texas that it will sue the state if it implements a strict immigration law known as SB4 that would empower state and local law enforcement officials to arrest, jail and prosecute migrants suspected of entering the U.S. unlawfully.

The Justice Department said it would file a lawsuit against SB4 if Texas did not assure federal officials by Jan. 3 that the state would refrain from enforcing the law as planned in March, according to a letter sent to Gov. Greg Abbott on Dec. 28 and obtained by CBS News. In addition to creating illegal entry crimes at the state level, the law would allow Texas judges to issue de facto deportation orders.

In its letter, the Justice Department said SB4 would effectively criminalize actions that are already illegal at the federal level, undermine relations with Mexico and prevent officials from enforcing federal immigration laws, including those designed to grant refuge to migrants fleeing persecution.

"Because SB 4 is unconstitutional and will disrupt the federal government's operations, we request that Texas forbear in its enforcement," Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian Boynton said in his letter to Abbott.

If Texas does not heed the Biden administration's demand, "the United States intends to file suit to enjoin the enforcement of SB 4," Boynton warned.

In a social media post on Thursday, Abbott, who signed SB4 earlier this month after the measure was passed by the Texas legislature, said the Biden administration's legal threat showed "hostility to the rule of law in America."

The Biden administration, he added, "not only refuses to enforce current U.S. immigration laws, they now want to stop Texas from enforcing laws against illegal immigration."

Renae Eze, a spokeswoman for Abbott, said Texas is prepared to defend SB4 before the Supreme Court.

SB4 is already being challenged in federal court by the American Civil Liberties Union, which has also argued the law is unconstitutional.

What would SB4 allow Texas to do?

SB4 is the latest attempt by Texas to challenge President Biden on immigration. Under Abbott, Texas has transported tens of thousands of migrants to New York City, Chicago and other Democratic-led cities, tasked National Guard units to fortify the Rio Grande with razor wire and assigned state troopers to arrest some migrants on trespassing charges.

The measure would be the strictest state immigration law in modern U.S. history, making unauthorized immigration a state crime, ranging from a misdemeanor to a felony.

Entering Texas illegally from Mexico would be treated as a misdemeanor crime, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000. Illegal reentry into Texas would be a felony offense, punishable with up to 2, 10 or 20 years in jail, depending on whether the migrant in question had been previously deported or convicted of certain crimes.

SB4 would also allow Texas magistrates to order migrants suspected of violating the illegal entry or reentry laws to return to Mexico as an alternative to continuing their prosecution. Those found to violate those orders could be charged with a second-degree felony.

The Mexican government has already said it would not accept returns of migrants from Texas state officials, denouncing SB4 as an "anti-immigrant" law.

Abbott and other supporters of SB4 have argued the law will deter illegal border crossings. He and other Republican leaders have faulted the Biden administration for the unprecedented levels of migrant crossings recorded over the past three years.

But critics of the law have said it will lead to racial profiling of people who look like migrants. They've also argued SB4 could backfire from a public safety perspective, overwhelming state and local jails and diverting law enforcement officials away from efforts to arrest serious criminals.

Read the full letter below:

Office of the Assistant Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division
Washington, DC 20044
December 28, 2023
By Electronic Mail

The Honorable Greg Abbott
Governor of Texas
P.O. Box 12428
Austin, TX 78711-2428
c/o [email protected]

Re: Texas Senate Bill 4

Dear Governor Abbott:

Texas recently enacted Senate Bill 4 (SB 4), which will become effective on March 5, 2024. The law purports to create new state crimes tied to federal prohibitions on unlawful entry and reentry by noncitizens into the United States, and it would authorize state judges to order the removal of certain noncitizens from the country. SB 4 is preempted and violates the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the United States intends to file suit to enjoin the enforcement of SB 4 unless Texas agrees to refrain from enforcing the law. The United States is committed to both securing the border and ensuring the processing of noncitizens consistent with the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). SB 4 is contrary to these goals.

The U.S. Constitution tasks the federal government with regulating immigration and controlling the international borders. See Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387, 394 (2012) (“the Government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration and the status of” noncitizens). To that end, Congress has established a comprehensive scheme governing the entry and removal of noncitizens, including, among other things, penalties for unlawful entries, grounds for removal, and protections from removal, consistent with U.S. obligations under international human rights and refugee laws. SB 4 effectively creates a separate state immigration scheme by imposing criminal penalties for violations of federal provisions on unlawful entry and reentry into the United States, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1325, 1326, and by authorizing state judges to order the removal of noncitizens from the United States. SB 4 therefore intrudes into a field that is occupied by the federal government and is preempted. Indeed, the Supreme Court has confirmed that “the removal process” must be “entrusted to the discretion of the Federal Government” because a “decision on removability” touches “on foreign relations and must be made with one voice.” Arizona, 567 U.S. at 409.

SB 4 also conflicts with various provisions of the INA. For example, it interferes with the federal government’s ability to enforce the entry and removal provisions of federal law, and it conflicts with various provisions of federal law permitting noncitizens to seek protection from removal to avoid persecution or torture. SB 4 likewise improperly regulates the movement of persons across an international boundary and undermines the United States’ foreign relations.

Because SB 4 is unconstitutional and will disrupt the federal government’s operations, we request that Texas forbear in its enforcement. To the extent you believe there are any facts or law supporting the validity of SB 4, we urge you to promptly bring them to our attention.

Please consider this letter to constitute notice, pursuant to § 1-10.100 and § 4-6.240 of the Justice Manual, that the Department of Justice intends to bring a lawsuit to enforce the supremacy of federal law and to enjoin the operation of SB 4. If you have not confirmed by January 3, 2024, that Texas will forbear enforcement of SB 4, the United States will pursue all appropriate legal remedies to ensure that Texas does not interfere with the functions of the federal government.

Sincerely,
Brian M. Boynton
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

cc: The Hon. Ken Paxton, Attorney General
Ryan Walters, Office of the Attorney General
 
LOL at Marxists:

"We love independent state action to remove unapproved candidates form state ballots"
 
LOL at Marxists:

"We love independent state action to remove unapproved candidates from state ballots"

Well, to be fair, that's something Texas knows a thing or two about ...

Republicans: "But muh democracy ..."

https://twitter.com/NateTheAnCap/status/1737564850061013485
442Uep3.png

 
Biden administration warns Texas it will sue if state implements strict immigration law
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-immigration-law-sb4-justice-department-threatens-lawsuit/
{Camilo Montoya-Galvez | 28 December 2023}
...
"Because SB 4 is unconstitutional and will disrupt the federal government's operations, we request that Texas forbear in its enforcement," Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian Boynton said in his letter to Abbott.
...

:eek: :tears:
 
Someone please stand up to the Feds.

Someone please stand up to anyone FFS.
 
Maybe they should mention the response to Missouri's Second Amendment Preservation Act.
The only place the Constitution preempts the states power here is Article IV, Section 4, but the feddle would have to be doing that for that to work.
 
(h/t @Brian4Liberty: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?559879-Invasion-USA&p=7207512#post7207512)

https://twitter.com/BillMelugin_/status/1745604622197113076
to: https://twitter.com/BillMelugin_/status/1745648404456181935
{Bill Melugin @BillMelugin_ | 11 January 2024}

[bold emphasis added - OB]

NEW: The Texas Military Department confirms the TX National Guard has seized control of Shelby Park in Eagle Pass (city property where mass illegal crossings are), and is restricting Border Patrol from accessing the area, saying the Feds “perpetuate illegal crossings”. This is the area where Border Patrol has been cutting TX razor wire. Razor wire and fences are now deployed to block the area off from the public and federal government. Attached video [see this tweet - OB] is from our crew on the ground this morning as they began blocking it off.

You can expect DOJ to sue Texas over this.

Texas Military Department statement:

“The Texas National Guard has maintained a presence with security points and temporary barrier in Shelby Park since 2021. The current posture is to prepare for future illegal immigrant surges and to restrict access to organizations that perpetuate illegal immigrant crossings in the park and greater Eagle Pass area.”

I reached out to CBP/Border Patrol in the sector for comment hours ago - no response yet.

NEW: The Border Patrol union confirms to me that agents are being blocked by Texas soldiers, and the union is praising Abbott for seizing control.

@BPUnion statement:

“Governor Abbott is not harming Border Patrol operations, he is enhancing them. His seizing control of Shelby Park allows our agents to deploy to troubled spots that experience high numbers of gotaways. Governor Abbott’s actions should be seen as a force multiplier.”

The city of Eagle Pass also confirms that its mayor was notified by @TxDPS that TX was taking control of Shelby Park as a result of @GovAbbott's emergency declaration.

uQ7MmbT.jpg


ARTICLE w/@AdamShawNY:
NEW: Gov. Abbott comments:
 
Last edited:
Holy Fort Sumpter, Batman!

Whoever shoots first here, loses.

Hold!

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1748314208616206501

BREAKING: The war between the state of Texas and the federal gov is escalating.

Last week, Texas seized Shelby Park.

The Biden administration is desperately trying to regain access to the area but is repeatedly getting blocked by the Texas National Guard.

Texas refused to comply with a deadline for handing back the park & is instead moving ahead building razor wires and arresting invaders.
 
Last edited:

This is why the animal had to be cornered ... until it lashes out, we cannot strike back because the Left will flip it around instantly into a case of "violent right-wing extremism"... remember, walking between velvet ropes is their definition of "violent right-wing extremism". And, with the DOJ and corrupt court system in their back-pocket, backing them up, they can get away with it. That's why the animal had to be cornered!
 
I just watched the Larkin Rose video that [MENTION=5460]CCTelander[/MENTION] posted :up:

Anyway, I have revised my thoughts concerning the “border issue”:

I am firm, firm believer that people must feel pain, tremendous pain in fact, before they finally realize how detrimental their ways of thinking, and actions, lead to even more tyranny. Fed, State, it is still “government” involvement/interference, one and the same. But because folks always embrace tyrannical solutions, I hope the great state of Texas spends every last tax payer cent on the biggest most glorious wall ever, lined with machine guns every 30 feet. Next step Canada, and then every shore from sea to shining sea. Then, when you wish to travel freely, you will be forced at gun point to show your papers, and hopefully encounter civil asset forfeiture. Perhaps, but still not likely, you will realize the only libertarian solution, but by that time it will be far too late.

Better group A does something bad than group B doing the same. It is, after all, a sporting event, or colors of two murderous evil rival biker gangs - pick one.

Glad yer gettin’ what ya wished for :fist:

 
I just watched the Larkin Rose video that [MENTION=5460]CCTelander[/MENTION] posted :up:

Anyway, I have revised my thoughts concerning the “border issue”:

I am firm, firm believer that people must feel pain, tremendous pain in fact, before they finally realize how detrimental their ways of thinking, and actions, lead to even more tyranny. Fed, State, it is still “government” involvement/interference, one and the same. But because folks always embrace tyrannical solutions, I hope the great state of Texas spends every last tax payer cent on the biggest most glorious wall ever, lined with machine guns every 30 feet. Next step Canada, and then every shore from sea to shining sea.

Then, when you wish to travel freely, you will be forced at gun point to show your papers, and hopefully encounter civil asset forfeiture. Perhaps, but still not likely, you will realize the only libertarian solution, but by that time it will be far too late.

Better group A does something bad than group B doing the same. It is, after all, a sporting event, or colors of two murderous evil rival biker gangs - pick one.

Glad yer gettin’ what ya wished for :fist:



I'm already subject to that.

The invading army is not.
 
Back
Top