If Bush wasn't impeached for war crimes and crimes against humanity for the millions of civilian deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, two pointless wars, and his foreign concentration camps used for the purposes of torture and indefinite imprisonment, what are the chances that Obama will be impeached based on an unconfirmed story that is virulently spreading solely in the tin-foil hat blogs?
Furthermore, why aren't most of the people so concerned about Obama and his every action barely phased by the heinous crimes of the previous administration? I don't like Obama or his big government policies, but common sense would dictate that his administration is no excuse for amnesia of the past eight years, or demanding that those responsible for it are held accountable. Since Obama has been elected, I've listened to mindless Neocon Republicans drone on about how evil Obama is, while overlooking the greater cause of our current situation and not giving Bush, Cheney, Rove, and the rest of them a second thought. At least I've been consistent in my condemnations of both administrations on principle alone.
That reminds me of a rather short conversation I had with a Republican woman the other day. She was telling me how she disapproved of Obama sending troops into Afghanistan, while not a few days before she was defending the war. My response was simply, "You Neocons started the pointless wars, you defended the pointless wars, but now you bitch and moan when a Democrat funds the pointless wars? If you don't want troops in Afghanistan, then I suppose you shouldn't support the Afghanistan war." The ability for the human mind to reconcile glaring contradictions without a second thought never ceases to amaze me, and I think it's this short term memory that allows these politicians to continue fleecing the people without finding themselves at the end of a rope.