Federal Reserve Transparency Act (S. 202) - My Senator's Disgusting Response

No1butPaul

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
1,531
I've called and am asking anyone that has an extra minute to carve out of their day to also call her office - even if you don't live in California. This woman has become way too powerful and I hope she (and all the others in the senate) feel the wrath of the American people on this. This bill is going to be much tougher to pass in the Senate than the House (which hopefully will be no problem!).

Feinstein's phone number is below. I will make a deal to call anyone else's senator that is currently not supporting the bill!

I agree that the trillions of dollars deployed by the Federal Reserve to stabilize the economy should be accounted for. On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (P.L. 111-203), which includes requirements for a complete audit of the Federal Reserve's emergency lending activities during the financial crisis. Specifically, this legislation requires that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) publish a full audit of the loans and other assistance provided to financial institutions during the economic crisis. The GAO is also empowered with ongoing audit authority over any future emergency lending activities, but is not authorized to directly review key monetary policies such as the setting of interest rates. I believe this legislation takes appropriate steps to prevent the politicization of monetary policy while still promoting transparency in the use of public funds.

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has introduced legislation that would require an additional audit of the Federal Reserve. The "Federal Reserve Transparency Act" (S. 202) would remove all existing restrictions on GAO audits, including confidentiality restrictions. I have some concerns that a more expansive audit, including a review of monetary policy, could prevent the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors from making key decisions free of outside political influence. This legislation is currently awaiting a vote in the Senate Banking Committee, of which I am not a member. However, please know that I have made careful note of your support for increased transparency of the Federal Reserve, and I will keep your thoughts in mind should this or other relevant legislation come before me for a vote.


Once again, thank you for writing. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841. Best regards.

Sincerely yours,
Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator
 
so is she suggesting that the fed is already NOT making decisions free from politics?
 
What do you expect? Feinstein is from that same israel-first cult (bernanke, greenspan, cohn) that runs the federal reserve. Why do you think virtually all israel-firsters are rich - they get their money from the fed's money creation. They do NOT want an audit.
 
And this is why electing senators by the people MUST be repealed and returned to the state. The people have their representatives, the senate should be the individual states "stop gap" for when the people are giving states rights away (which the FED helps with). The election of senators means that the PTB can stop bills (unless amended to castrate) by only running/gaming campaigns for 2 senators from each state instead of using the house which has many more representatives.

Return the election of senators back to the state legislatures.
 
And this is why electing senators by the people MUST be repealed and returned to the state. The people have their representatives, the senate should be the individual states "stop gap" for when the people are giving states rights away (which the FED helps with). The election of senators means that the PTB can stop bills (unless amended to castrate) by only running/gaming campaigns for 2 senators from each state instead of using the house which has many more representatives.

Return the election of senators back to the state legislatures.

I fail to see how that would get rid of Senator Feinstein. The state legislature of California is majority Democrat. Senators Feinstein and Boxer would cruise to re-election with or without the 17th Amendment.. (Not saying anything about repealing the 17th amendment...just giving a thought.)
 
I fail to see how that would get rid of Senator Feinstein. The state legislature of California is majority Democrat. Senators Feinstein and Boxer would cruise to re-election with or without the 17th Amendment.. (Not saying anything about repealing the 17th amendment...just giving a thought.)

It may not get rid of a senator in a particular state, but it would have a great overall effect on the senate as a whole.
 
Thats an incriminating line...

I have some concerns that a more expansive audit, including a review of monetary policy, could prevent the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors from making key decisions free of outside political influence.

 
I have some concerns that a more expansive audit, including a review of monetary policy, could prevent the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors from making key decisions free of outside political influence.
Anyone have a response to follow up?

1) Who is to say political influence isn't already driving key decisions?
2) And if we find out they haven't been influenced already, why would having a full audit make them more susceptible to political influence?
 
She's my Senator too and being a former Democrat myself, I am ashamed to say I voted for her. With that said, I got the same reply from her when I emailed them. She's up for re-election again this year and it sickens me that chances are she will be re-elected.
 
We have a shot to get Boxer on board. She cosponsored S 604 in 2009 before it got watered down so we can use that against her.

Whenever anyone contacts Boxer, make sure you mention that she cosponsored a FULL audit bill in 2009.
 
Anyone have a response to follow up?

"The Constitution grants Congress - a political body - the power to coin money, and the first Congress so despised currency debasement that they declared the punishment for same was death."
 
Back
Top