Fed to order 1 week universal bank shut-down?

Not sure why you're trying to start an argument with me. I never said it was happening like the website said. I said the pieces do seem to be coming together. I guess there's no new threads on Israel to occupy your time lately...anyway...

What's the most assured way to sit on the new cash? Close the doors! Its certainly a very extreme example but it's not unheard of for banking holidays to be suddenly declared during financial turmoil and it's *going to happen at some point* during this slow spiraling financial crash. I get the feeling you haven't the foggiest clue where the basis of our entire financial system comes from. It's been shown over and over that those at the top do NOT care about you. Once they have wrung as much money and power out of the system as possible, they crash it intentionally and start the process all over again. How they will go about doing it is anybody's guess. But we are seeing it in action right now so who's to say what will or will not happen? It's uncharted territory for 99% of us since most Depression-era people are either dead or so old and senile they can't remember their grandkid's names much less the bread lines in 1930.

And that's not even addressing the video floating around that a large chunk of the bailout money is going to foreign investors, who will probably spend it on gold reserves. I presume its to help them lick their wounds and ride out the coming global crash.

Forget REAL news links. I recommend some real good viewing called The Money Masters to bring you up to speed on the history involved and how this same "game" has been played on people for hundreds of years:
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=money+masters&emb=0#

Big picture bro. The exact specifics are minor. The end result is always the same.

ZippyJuan starts arguments he can't finish. Zippy, show me proof a shutdown of banks for a week would cause a collapse. I don't support it in any way, shape, or form, but it's time you start backing up what you say. You still have yet to respond to the debate on the gold standard you started but did not finish.
 
This is just a few people trying to cause a run on banks, that's all.

I personally hope it works, but don't try and fool Ron Paul guys.....that's like shooting yourself in the foot.

Besides, i'm not worried about a bank shutdown, i've got enough ammo to feed me for a lifetime :)
 
Sorry, I don't do "Israel" threads. You can check my profile on that if you like. And I do note that you say that you do not necessarily agree with the original post. Not all of my comments were directed at you, only to respond to the "sitting on cash" comment as it related to closures.

Because there is a You Tube video on something does not necessarily make it true either. That is not a news source.

Ooops my apologies. You are correct. Your name always showed up in threads to bash 9/11 truthers, not Israel threads. I knew it was in my establishment troll file for some reason.

Have you actually watched the video? If not, watch all 3.5 hours of it and then comment.
 
ZippyJuan starts arguments he can't finish. Zippy, show me proof a shutdown of banks for a week would cause a collapse. I don't support it in any way, shape, or form, but it's time you start backing up what you say. You still have yet to respond to the debate on the gold standard you started but did not finish.

Correction- you are the one who does not finish. In the other thread I offered my opinion about how a trade decicit could lead to a country on a gold standard losing gold reseves (as someone had asked earlier in the thread) and included links to support it. You only said that I was not correct but did not offer any explination of why I was not correct or provide an alternative explination. I saw no point in continuing. Disagree- fine. No problem. But it helps if you explain why you disagree. I requested a couple of times for some information on my errors but received no real responce much beyond "do more research zippy". But that seems to be his style- just criticize. Check his profile out.

For a link to the gold standard thread: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=158834

Perhaps closing the banks for a week would be good for the economy?

And as for 9/11- even Ron Paul agrees that while there are questions about the governement's actions and their investigation he does not think it was an inside job. He is not a truther in that sense. But I do not agree with Ron Paul on every issue either.
If my disagreeing with 9/11 truthers makes me an establishment troll- then what does that mean for Ron Paul? Is he one too?
 
Last edited:
Correction- you are the one who does not finish. In the other thread I offered my opinion about how a trade decicit could lead to a country on a gold standard losing gold reseves (as someone had asked earlier in the thread) and included links to support it. You only said that I was not correct but did not offer any explination of why I was not correct or provide an alternative explination. I saw no point in continuing. Disagree- fine. No problem. But it helps if you explain why you disagree. I requested a couple of times for some information on my errors but received no real responce much beyond "do more research zippy". But that seems to be his style- just criticize. Check his profile out.

For a link to the gold standard thread: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=158834

Perhaps closing the banks for a week would be good for the economy?

And as for 9/11- even Ron Paul agrees that while there are questions about the governement's actions and their investigation he does not think it was an inside job. He is not a truther in that sense. But I do not agree with Ron Paul on every issue either.
If my disagreeing with 9/11 truthers makes me an establishment troll- then what does that mean for Ron Paul? Is he one too?

You never specified gold standard or gold exchange standard, which is very important to the discussion. They are completely different. When you talk about reserves I'd be led to think you mean exchange standard.
 
He has a very pesimistic view of the economy going foreward:
To avoid confusion, please remember that the comments above have a very short time horizon. Always invest with the primary trend. Gold's primary trend is up, targeting at least $3,130.00; silver's primary is up targeting 16:1 gold/silver ratio or $195.66; stocks' primary trend is down, targeting Dow under 2,900 and worth only one ounce of gold; US$ or US$-denominated assets, primary trend down; real estate in a bubble, primary trend way down
Dow to drop 70%.
Gold to to up four fold.
He does not give any time horizon- next year? Next 50 years?
 
Maybe they are bracing for possible unrest that could occur if the election is very close and with many irregularities. Or preparing for a possible bank run caused by internet and text message rumors.
 
Back to some facts:

This is END of Quarter and for some corporations/banks/financials... end of fiscal year.

Wedenesday, Oct 1, 2008... the AUDITORS are now reviewing the corporate books. There's like 43 TRILLION in debt out there...

There just may be a FED policy, IF, the BAILOUT BRIBERY BILL is passed ASAP. There are rumors, just rumors, that an AWFUL lot of auditing is needed to expose the TOXIC debt that WON'T receive BAILOUT BUCKS and the so-called Dealable debt. We've already have seen government actions in seizing banks and slicing and dicing them into good and bad parts.

I'm sure SHEILA BLAIR has her list of POSION and POTION for the banks... so there may be a shutdown/delay/whatever to banks for a "WHITEWASH" of DEBT
 
Back
Top