FBI Uncovered Russian Bribery Plot Before Obama Approved Uranium One Deal

[Swordsmyth]

[h=1]Senate Launches Probe Into Russian Nuclear Bribery Case That Netted Clintons Millions[/h]http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-18/senate-judiciary-launches-probe-russian-nuclear-bribery-case-netted-clintons-million

 

[The One]

Bump

 

[Danke]

Bump

 

[Danke]

Robert Mueller Accused Of Providing Cover For Clinton While FBI Director
October 18, 2017 By Robert Gehl


Robert Mueller, who is now in charge of the Justice Department’s Russia investigation, is accused of hiding evidence showing Russian officials engaged in a bribery scheme with Hillary Clinton’s charity while Mueller was FBI director.


As far back as 2009, FBI officials had gathered “substantial evidence” that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, The Hill reports.


Included in the bribery scheme is the routing of millions of dollars designed to benefit the Clinton Foundation during the time Hillary was Secretary of State.

"Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

Rather than bring immediate charges for the scheme though, the FBI and Justice Department decided to continue “investigating” the issue for four more years – leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions."
​

The first decision occurred in October 2010, when the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States unanimously approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, giving Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium supply.


On the campaign trail, the decision was used by President Donald Trump against Hillary, who denied any involvement in the committee review. But The Hill reports that Clinton and then-Attorney General Eric Holder were on the Committee on Foreign Investment when the deal was approved.


In 2011, the administration gave approval for Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary to sell commercial uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants in a partnership with the United States Enrichment Corp. Before then, Tenex had been limited to selling U.S. nuclear power plants reprocessed uranium recovered from dismantled Soviet nuclear weapons under the 1990s “Megatons to Megawatts” peace program.


“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, who spoke anonymously for fear of retribution from either U.S. or Russian officials.

"Former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), who chaired the House Intelligence Committee during the time the FBI probe was being conducted, told The Hill that he was never told of anything regarding “Russian nuclear corruption,” though many of his fellow lawmakers were concerned about the deal, which was also approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

“Not providing information on a corruption scheme before the Russian uranium deal was approved by U.S. regulators and engage appropriate congressional committees has served to undermine U.S. national security interests by the very people charged with protecting them,” Rogers said. “The Russian efforts to manipulate our American political enterprise is breathtaking.”
​

 

[Swordsmyth]

[h=1]Rosenstein to Investigate Himself?[/h]
Rosenstein was on the CFIUS committee that approved the sale despite knowing that, as The Hill reported, “Russian nuclear officials were engaged in a racketeering scheme involving bribes, kickbacks and money laundering,” that also ensnared the Clinton Foundation.
After the Senate Judiciary Committee announced its intention to launch a full scale investigation, Senator Charles Grassley asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions today if Rosenstein, as Deputy Attorney General, would be allowed to investigate himself.


“I don’t think it would be proper for him to supervise a review of his own conduct, do you?” asked Grassley.
“It would be his decision,” responded Sessions.
Sessions’ bizarre comments prompted some to ask if the Attorney General had been compromised.
“Attorney General Jeff Sessions is compromised. He has to be,” wrote Jim Hoft.
“Deep State has something on him and the Attorney General is acting irrationally.”

More at: https://www.infowars.com/russian-bribery-cover-up-rosenstein-to-investigate-himself/

 

[Swordsmyth]

[h=1]FBI Informant Blocked From Telling Congress About Russia Nuclear Case[/h]
An American businessman who worked for years undercover as an FBI confidential witness was blocked by the Obama Justice Department from telling Congress about conversations and transactions he witnessed related to the Russian nuclear industry’s efforts to win favor with Bill and Hillary Clinton and influence Obama administration decisions, his lawyer tells The Hill.
Attorney Victoria Toensing, a former Reagan Justice Department official and former chief counsel of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday she is working with members of Congress to see if they can get the Trump Justice Department or the FBI to free her client to talk to lawmakers.
“All of the information about this corruption has not come out,” she said in an interview Tuesday.

More at: http://thehill.com/policy/national-...ed-from-telling-congress-about-russia-nuclear

 

[Working Poor]

*yawn

 

[Champ]

This may end up bringing us back full circle to Clinton Foundation activities soon.

More on Clinton Foundation links: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...n-purposely-hid-russian-uranium-one-payments/

 

[Champ]

There are so many concurrent scandals happening at the moment, one is bound to break through the Mueller/Rosenstein/Comey/McCabe deep state coverup blanket.

People have become so disillusioned to the corruption and abuse of power and the subsequent lack of consequence for the corruption that that in itself is becoming a major story. Faith in government institutions (especially FBI and DoJ) continues to erode rapidly. This is a good thing.

 

[Swordsmyth]

[h=1]Emails Reveal Bill Clinton Met With Vladimir Putin Just Before Uranium One Deal[/h]http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-20/emails-reveal-bill-clinton-sought-meetings-key-russian-nuclear-officials-just-uraniu

 

[parocks]

[h=1]Senate Launches Probe Into Russian Nuclear Bribery Case That Netted Clintons Millions[/h]http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-18/senate-judiciary-launches-probe-russian-nuclear-bribery-case-netted-clintons-million

This and the crimes of Hillary Clinton should be what politics is about for the next 3 years.

Does everyone hear agree with most things that Trump is doing? No. Many support much or most. Some little or none.

But who is going to complain about seeing Hillary publically humiliated and her supporters absolutely shamed. Nail this down. All the things that Hillary has done dwarf anything else. There's so much shtshow garbage that I guess the media feels that is a non stop barrage of whatever sht, will distract from Hillary.

It's night, dark hard to see, if a geyser of sht is flowing onto the windshield so fast that the windshield wipers can't keep up, you definitely won't notice Hillary in a communist, satanist, lesbian ritual eating a baby.

 

[Swordsmyth]

This and the crimes of Hillary Clinton should be what politics is about for the next 3 years.

Does everyone hear agree with most things that Trump is doing? No. Many support much or most. Some little or none.

But who is going to complain about seeing Hillary publically humiliated and her supporters absolutely shamed. Nail this down. All the things that Hillary has done dwarf anything else. There's so much shtshow garbage that I guess the media feels that is a non stop barrage of whatever sht, will distract from Hillary.

It's night, dark hard to see, if a geyser of sht is flowing onto the windshield so fast that the windshield wipers can't keep up, you definitely won't notice Hillary in a communist, satanist, lesbian ritual eating a baby.

Rand Paul 2020: I will actually LOCK HER UP

 

[nikcers]

This and the crimes of Hillary Clinton should be what politics is about for the next 3 years.

Does everyone hear agree with most things that Trump is doing? No. Many support much or most. Some little or none.

But who is going to complain about seeing Hillary publically humiliated and her supporters absolutely shamed. Nail this down. All the things that Hillary has done dwarf anything else. There's so much shtshow garbage that I guess the media feels that is a non stop barrage of whatever sht, will distract from Hillary.

It's night, dark hard to see, if a geyser of sht is flowing onto the windshield so fast that the windshield wipers can't keep up, you definitely won't notice Hillary in a communist, satanist, lesbian ritual eating a baby.

No, this should not be what politics is about for the next 3 years, it should be the same thing we have been doing. Going against interventionist foreign policy, getting the government out of our business, fighting for more people in the senate to help Rand get rid of Obamacare. We can't stop Clinton from doing shit she already did, but we can sure as hell stop world war 3 if we don't shit ourselves over fake partisan witchhunts that won't go nowhere. If we are just going to spend the next 3 years talking about how shitty Obama Clinton is then we are part of the problem.

 

[Swordsmyth]

No, this should not be what politics is about for the next 3 years, it should be the same thing we have been doing. Going against interventionist foreign policy, getting the government out of our business, fighting for more people in the senate to help Rand get rid of Obamacare. We can't stop Clinton from doing $#@! she already did, but we can sure as hell stop world war 3 if we don't $#@! ourselves over fake partisan witchhunts that won't go nowhere. If we are just going to spend the next 3 years talking about how $#@!ty Obama Clinton is then we are part of the problem.

But it might be PART of a primary campaign against Dump.

 

[Champ]

This and the crimes of Hillary Clinton should be what politics is about for the next 3 years.

Does everyone hear agree with most things that Trump is doing? No. Many support much or most. Some little or none.

But who is going to complain about seeing Hillary publically humiliated and her supporters absolutely shamed. Nail this down. All the things that Hillary has done dwarf anything else. There's so much shtshow garbage that I guess the media feels that is a non stop barrage of whatever sht, will distract from Hillary.

It's night, dark hard to see, if a geyser of sht is flowing onto the windshield so fast that the windshield wipers can't keep up, you definitely won't notice Hillary in a communist, satanist, lesbian ritual eating a baby.

Agreed on most points. They shouldn't be stopping at Hillary, there is an entire cabal of networks in DC (Awan group is just the start) setup for the primary purpose of extracting money and emboldening not only themselves, but other countries and other groups of tactical interest(ISIS). The network extends from there into the media and entertainment industry. Like a rat's nest. The list of people involved is too long to list at this point, so making this about one person (Hillary) is doing a whole lot in order to achieve very little.

This is what politics are going to be about in the years to come, not because they should be, but because the people let it get to this point and we have no choice. Even if key political elites never go down, the way investigations are handled from a growing group of citizen investigators and the way alternative media has been stepping up to shine a light on what is going on has forever changed the way these career criminals are going to carry on with their business. And I'm sure it's not a change in behavior they are taking kindly to.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

House Republicans launch new probes into Obama-era Uranium One deal, FBI handling of Clinton caseFox News 10m ago

 

[AZJoe]

THE FBI’S FORGOTTEN CRIMINAL RECORD

The FBI has a long record of both deceit and incompetence. Five years ago, Americans learned that the FBI was teaching its agents that “the FBI has the ability to bend or suspend the law to impinge on the freedom of others.” This has practically been the Bureau’s motif since its creation in 1908.

The bureau was small potatoes until Woodrow Wilson dragged the United States into World War I. In one fell swoop, the number of dangerous Americans increased by perhaps twentyfold. The Espionage Act of 1917 made it easy to jail anyone who criticized the war or the government. In September 1918, the bureau … seized more than 50,000 suspected draft dodgers off the streets and out of the restaurants of New York, Newark, and Jersey City. … the vast majority of young men who had been arrested turned out to be innocent.

In January 1920, … the “Palmer Raids” … Nearly 10,000 suspected Reds and radicals were seized. … Attorney General Mitchell Palmer sought to use the massive roundups to propel his presidential candidacy. The operation took a drubbing, however, after an insolent judge demanded that the Justice Department provide evidence for why people had been arrested. Federal judge George Anderson complained that the government had created a “spy system” that “destroys trust and confidence and propagates hate. …”

After … the Palmer raids, … The bureau targeted “senators whom the Attorney General saw as threats to America … breaking into their offices and homes, intercepting their mail, and tapping their telephones,” … The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was illegally targeted because the bureau feared he might support diplomatic recognition of Soviet Russia. …

The FBI tapped the home telephone of a Supreme Court clerk, and at least one Supreme Court Justice feared the FBI had bugged the conference room where justices privately discussed cases. In 1945, President Harry Truman wrote in his diary, “We want no Gestapo or Secret Police. FBI is tending in that direction…. This must stop.” …

The bureau’s power soared after Congress passed the Internal Security Act of 1950 … Hoover compiled a list of more than 20,000 “potentially or actually dangerous” Americans who could be seized and locked away at the president’s command. Hoover specified that “the hearing procedure [for detentions] will not be bound by the rules of evidence.” “Congress secretly financed the creation of six of these [detention] camps in the 1950s,” ...

From 1956 through 1971, the FBI’s COINTELPRO program conducted thousands of covert operations to incite street warfare between violent groups, to get people fired, to portray innocent people as government informants, and to cripple or destroy left-wing, black, communist, white racist, and anti-war organizations. FBI agents also busied themselves forging “poison pen” letters to wreck activists’ marriages. The FBI set up a Ghetto Informant Program … that had 7,402 informants …

it even worked to expose and discredit … “Young Men’s Christian Association and Boy Scouts,” as a 1976 Senate report noted. … and harass protesters partly because of its “belief that dissident speech and association should be prevented …” … COINTELPRO was exposed only after a handful of activists burglarized an FBI office in a Philadelphia suburb, seized FBI files, and leaked the damning documents to the media. …

April 19, 1993 … its agents used 54-ton tanks to smash into the Branch Davidians’ sprawling, ramshackle home near Waco, Texas. The tanks intentionally collapsed 25 percent of the building on top of the huddled residents. … the FBI pumped the building full of CS gas (banned for use on enemy soldiers by a chemical-weapons treaty), a fire ignited that left 80 children, women, and men dead. … FBI agents had stopped firetrucks … Six years after the assault, news leaked that the FBI had fired incendiary tear-gas cartridges into the Davidians’ home prior to the fire’s erupting. … the FBI brazenly lied about what it did at Waco …

The FBI has long relied on entrapment … The FBI Academy taught agents that subjects of FBI investigations “have forfeited their right to the truth.” …

In the Liberty City 7 case in Florida, FBI [provocateurs] planted the notion of blowing up government buildings. …a federal judge concluded that the government “came up with the crime, provided the means, and removed all relevant obstacles” in order to make a “terrorist” out of a man “whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in scope.” …

The FBI bankrolled a right-wing New Jersey blogger and radio host for five years prior to his 2009 arrest for threatening federal judges. … how many bloggers, talk-show hosts, or activists the FBI is currently financing. …

 

[parocks]

No, this should not be what politics is about for the next 3 years, it should be the same thing we have been doing. Going against interventionist foreign policy, getting the government out of our business, fighting for more people in the senate to help Rand get rid of Obamacare. We can't stop Clinton from doing $#@! she already did, but we can sure as hell stop world war 3 if we don't $#@! ourselves over fake partisan witchhunts that won't go nowhere. If we are just going to spend the next 3 years talking about how $#@!ty Obama Clinton is then we are part of the problem.

Is that what Trump is doing? The Liberty thing is our thing, we like it, but who else is all about that? Trump can make the GOP happy and others happy by talking about what a crook Hillary is for 3 years, and then finally putting her in jail.

 

[nikcers]

Is that what Trump is doing? The Liberty thing is our thing, we like it, but who else is all about that? Trump can make the GOP happy and others happy by talking about what a crook Hillary is for 3 years, and then finally putting her in jail.

Trump is just a politician just like anyone else, if there was enough demand for policy change he would have to do it. Just like he did the health care executive order. He only did something pro liberty because it was politically expedient for him to do so, Rand Paul cornered him by campaigning on every news program for that policy and telling the country that it was "trumps" bright idea.

 

[parocks]

Agreed on most points. They shouldn't be stopping at Hillary, there is an entire cabal of networks in DC (Awan group is just the start) setup for the primary purpose of extracting money and emboldening not only themselves, but other countries and other groups of tactical interest(ISIS). The network extends from there into the media and entertainment industry. Like a rat's nest. The list of people involved is too long to list at this point, so making this about one person (Hillary) is doing a whole lot in order to achieve very little.

This is what politics are going to be about in the years to come, not because they should be, but because the people let it get to this point and we have no choice. Even if key political elites never go down, the way investigations are handled from a growing group of citizen investigators and the way alternative media has been stepping up to shine a light on what is going on has forever changed the way these career criminals are going to carry on with their business. And I'm sure it's not a change in behavior they are taking kindly to.

Oh, I'm not saying stop at Hillary. I can say that it could be made about Hillary, and that success or failure could be based on whether or not Hillary is jailed.

But sure, Podesta too, absolutely, same with Soros. Trump hasn't even really realized that he can fire people.

Wasn't that his thing "you're fired" on that tv show which prepared him to be President?

We read these things, some D is indicted, but his D brother works for the Fed Gov, still.

You can write a bunch of last names of the most awful folks and just cross reference that list of last names with Fed Gov employees, and fire them all.



The difference between Obama and Trump is that Obama had a full list of people of people he wanted to hire so that they could all fck with americans in a sinister way. Thousands of people plotting together, big money, big bribery, etc.

Trump has like 5 people total. And 2 slots keep getting new people put in. Half of the sinister Obama / Hillary types are still operating as if it was the Obama administration.

I thought that the government was going to be ripped to shreds, drain the swamp and all that.