FBI Uncovered Russian Bribery Plot Before Obama Approved Uranium One Deal

Swordsmyth

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
74,737
As the mainstream media continues to obsess over $100,000 worth Facebook ads allegedly purchased by Russian spies in 2016 seeking to throw the presidential election, we're almost certain they'll ignore the much larger Russian bombshell dropped today in the form of newly released FBI documents that reveal for the very first time that the Obama administration was well aware of illegal bribery, extortion and money laundering schemes being conducted by the Russians to get a foothold in the atomic energy business in the U.S. before approving a deal that handed them 20% of America's uranium reserves...and resulted in a windfall of donations to the Clinton Foundation.
As we pointed out last summer when Peter Schweizer first released his feature documentary Clinton Cash, the Uranium One deal, as approved by the Obama Administration, netted the Clintons and their Clinton Foundation millions of dollars in donations and 'speaking fees' from Uranium One shareholders and other Russian entities.


Russian Purchase of US Uranium Assets in Return for $145mm in Contributions to the Clinton Foundation - Bill and Hillary Clinton assisted a Canadian financier, Frank Giustra, and his company, Uranium One, in the acquisition of uranium mining concessions in Kazakhstan and the United States. Subsequently, the Russian government sought to purchase Uranium One but required approval from the Obama administration given the strategic importance of the uranium assets. In the run-up to the approval of the deal by the State Department, nine shareholders of Uranium One just happened to make $145mm in donations to the Clinton Foundation. Moreover, the New Yorker confirmed that Bill Clinton received $500,000 in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank, with ties to the Kremlin, around the same time. Needless to say, the State Department approved the deal giving Russia ownership of 20% of U.S. uranium assets
Now, thanks to newly released affidavits from a case that landed one of the Russian co-conspirators, Vadim Mikerin, in jail, we learn that not only was the Obama administration aware the Russians' illegal acts in the U.S. but it may have also been fully aware that "Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow." Per The Hill:


Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.

Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.
2017.10.17%20-%20Clinton%20Cash_0.JPG

Of course, when Schweizer's book first made Uranium One a political hot topic in 2015, both the Obama administration and the Clintons defended their actions and insisted there was no evidence that any Russians or donors engaged in wrongdoing and there was no national security reason for anyone to oppose the deal. That said, we now know that the FBI was aware of wrongdoing going back to at least April 2009 even though the deal wasn't approved until October 2010.

More at: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...lot-obama-approved-uranium-one-deal-netting-c
 
We won't get any attention on this because it doesn't fit any narrative that people have subscribed to. The people that think there was no Russian collusion will always think that Russian collusion is fake news, and the people who think that there was Russian collusion have the right idea just backwards. This is what I have been trying to argue for months on here and people have been neg repping me.
 
We won't get any attention on this because it doesn't fit any narrative that people have subscribed to. The people that think there was no Russian collusion will always think that Russian collusion is fake news, and the people who think that there was Russian collusion have the right idea just backwards. This is what I have been trying to argue for months on here and people have been neg repping me.

LOL

You have been claiming that Russia intervened for Trump.
 
We won't get any attention on this because it doesn't fit any narrative that people have subscribed to. The people that think there was no Russian collusion will always think that Russian collusion is fake news, and the people who think that there was Russian collusion have the right idea just backwards. This is what I have been trying to argue for months on here and people have been neg repping me.
In what universe is allegedly paying facebook trolls the equivalent of bribing the state department?


1nzla4.jpg
 
In what universe is allegedly paying facebook trolls the equivalent of bribing the state department?
Intent does not always preclude impact. I don't mind debating this if you want to really debate this, but this is precisely what I was talking about. This was never about partisan politics because if it was about partisan politics then Trump wouldn't of became a Republican when he was a democrat all of those years.

Rand Paul said that Clinton would lose against anyone that she ran against because she was a criminal because of the book that was coming out detailing the sale of Uranium to the Russians. He said this prior to announcing he was running, that was the prediction the RAND PAUL made.

This is what people are ignoring, there was so much controlled opposition running that even people on the same team were fighting with eachother. Its not like the democrats didn't know that Clinton was polling really badly against GENERIC REPUBLICAN. The establishment knew who they were polling bad with and did everything they could to stop a bipartisan anti war coalition, they did everything they could to stop a Rand Paul.
 
Intent does not always preclude impact. I don't mind debating this if you want to really debate this, but this is precisely what I was talking about. This was never about partisan politics because if it was about partisan politics then Trump wouldn't of became a Republican when he was a democrat all of those years.
What is there to debate? Russian trolls didn't help elect Trump, that accusation's dead in the water. If any foreign nation subverts our elections its NatSoc Israel and nobody seems to give a shit. Its as if Red Scare and Yellow Peril were fabrications...
 
Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation in the run-up to State Department approval.

The Clintons took the cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The Clintons hid the donations which is a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secreatary of State. …

Sara Carter of Circa News interviewed Victoria Toensing, a lawyer for the FBI informant.
The FBI informant was actually threatened by the Obama administration for speaking out about the corruption he witnessed while he was providing information. Toensing said her client “is not only afraid of the Russian people, but he is afraid of the US government because of the threats the Obama administration made against him.”
 
What is there to debate? Russian trolls didn't help elect Trump, that accusation's dead in the water. If any foreign nation subverts our elections its NatSoc Israel and nobody seems to give a $#@!. Its as if Red Scare and Yellow Peril were fabrications...
I disagree, the establishment ignores threats to make them go away. Trump got the most free air time from the fake news, he got the most attention for the primaries.

The military industrial complex that is coaching Nikki Hailey ran 6 figure ads against Rand Paul not Donald Trump for siding with Obama on the Iran agreement, Trump said in 2011 that he would run 3rd party if Ron Paul was the republican nominee because Ron Paul doesn't even think in terms of Israel because he is not against diplomacy with Iran.

Why would anyone do this? The money, we fund both opposition groups and destabilize countries in the middle east because it makes a shit ton of money, and Trump makes money off of it. The argument that I made, and that you guys continue to take out of context is not that Russian trolls colluded to make Trump win. Its that Russia did intervene in the US election, and the result was Trump won.

Non government forces and government forces allowed it to happen and it was most likely orchestrated and engineered by the US deep state in order to unify Americans against Russia because before the 2016 election Ron Paul's argument was winning, and we didn't support war with Russia..

There is nothing that happens, especially on the Internet in Russia that Putin doesn't know about and allow, its not that Putin did it himself, but he did let it happen. If the US government allowed some terrorist organization like the democrat party to instigate a war with Russia by orchestrating a false flag attack the best option is to let them do it. When America is punching themselves in the face you let them do it, its working for Iran.
 
I disagree, the establishment ignores threats to make them go away. Trump got the most free air time from the fake news, he got the most attention for the primaries.

The military industrial complex that is coaching Nikki Hailey ran 6 figure ads against Rand Paul not Donald Trump for siding with Obama on the Iran agreement, Trump said in 2011 that he would run 3rd party if Ron Paul was the republican nominee because Ron Paul doesn't even think in terms of Israel because he is not against diplomacy with Iran.
And this tells you Russia, and not, you know, Israel, are our enemy? :rolleyes:

rand-paul.jpg


Question: Is Rand praying at the Berlin Wall or the Wailing Wall?

Why would anyone do this? The money, we fund both opposition groups and destabilize countries in the middle east because it makes a $#@! ton of money, and Trump makes money off of it. The argument that I made, and that you guys continue to take out of context is not that Russian trolls colluded to make Trump win. Its that Russia did intervene in the US election, and the result was Trump won.

Non government forces and government forces allowed it to happen and it was most likely orchestrated and engineered by the US deep state in order to unify Americans against Russia because before the 2016 election Ron Paul's argument was winning, and we didn't support war with Russia..

There is nothing that happens, especially on the Internet in Russia that Putin doesn't know about and allow, its not that Putin did it himself, but he did let it happen. If the US government allowed some terrorist organization like the democrat party to instigate a war with Russia by orchestrating a false flag attack the best option is to let them do it. When America is punching themselves in the face you let them do it, its working for Iran.
You must have tied your brain in knots to think this up... correlation isn't causation, nor does your theory cast much suspicion on Russia but on Israel. Israel gain from a distracted Europe and a war-weird America, with Neocons at the helm coaching politicians and the MSM into Russophobia. Iran loses; I'm not even sure what you're referencing in that last sentence... what's working for Iran?
 
You must have tied your brain in knots to think this up... correlation isn't causation, nor does your theory cast much suspicion on Russia but on Israel. Israel gain from a distracted Europe and a war-weird America, with Neocons at the helm coaching politicians and the MSM into Russophobia. Iran loses, I'm not even sure what you're referencing in that last sentence... what's working for Iran?
Not really does Putin gain from this, politically but geopolitically. Russia has become more powerful, and more feared by allowing this to happen. By allowing it to happen I am talking about how Russia's economy works, no one makes money in Russia without their oligarchs making money and allowing it to happen.

It takes two to tango- as far as Israel goes naturally they are not an enemy, but they are a huge threat to our national security because they perpetuate the deep states boondoggles by using the race card and calling people racist because they don't do your bidding.

The deep state is the enemy, Iranians win every time they sit back and let us punch ourselves in the face, which is why they are even winning control over the middle east, we fund opposition groups and then have them fight each other because the MIC makes more money that way, the Iranians sit back watch us punch ourselves in the face and win.
 
Last edited:
Much like so many other cases in recent years, people that did a minimal amount of research into this ages ago found out the same conclusions that are being published today. The MSM garbage news is notoriously slow at giving people the scoop, when they actually decide to do so, and that is a part of why they are dying and people are naturally tuning into other sources that are proving to be far superior platforms for quicker information retrieval.

It's no surprise this is hardly being covered by most MSM sources. They didn't when news and rumors of this first broke more than a year ago, so there is no incentive to cover it now as doubling and tripling down on every poor decision is the norm.
 
And this tells you Russia, and not, you know, Israel, are our enemy? :rolleyes:
methinks that this was self defense but the best geopolitical option Russia had, not only was the Obama administration supporting opposition groups in countries bordering Russia they were funding opposition groups for regime change and surrounding Russia with troops.

Trump hasn't changed any of that really by expanding NATO, sanctions against Russia... That doesn't change the fact that the Russia scare did sway the election, the underlying message that won was that Clinton can't win because if Clinton wins we go to war with Russia.

Not only did we still escalate war with Russia but people are buying the narrative that Trump is different because Clinton was against him. That's like saying Obama was different because Mccain and Clinton was against him. That's like saying Obama was different because he funded ISIS to fight Assad instead of sending US troops to fight Assad.
 
Last edited:
Not really does Putin gain from this, politically but geopolitically. Russia has become more powerful, and more feared by allowing this to happen. By allowing it to happen I am talking about how Russia's economy works, no one makes money in Russia without their oligarchs making money and allowing it to happen.

It takes two to tango- as far as Israel goes naturally they are not an enemy, but they are a huge threat to our national security because they perpetuate the deep states boondoggles by using the race card and calling people racist because they don't do your bidding.

The deep state is the enemy, Iranians win every time they sit back and let us punch ourselves in the face, which is why they are even winning control over the middle east, we fund opposition groups and then have them fight each other because the MIC makes more money that way, the Iranians sit back watch us punch ourselves in the face and win.



uss-liberty_remember_w-texblk_lg.png
 
I find it hard to believe that USA requires permission and approval from the highest levels of government to sell Uranium, but Russia had no idea what was going on.. I find it hard to believe that the people who control their government the Oligarchs were unaware, and allowed that much money to change hands without sticking their own hands out.

Maybe I just have no idea how the Russian government works and buying yellow cake and making a lot of money and giving a lot of money to the Clinton foundation, is something that the Russian government would not be aware of, nor would they have to get permission from their government. They are just bastions of free markets with no government monopolies... right?
 
Back
Top