FBI Says No One Killed at Sandy Hook

Either Newton, Connecticut is a CIA run town filled with paid actors who are following a script, or the people 'allegedly' (:rolleyes:) killed by a deranged lunatic are actually dead, because I am fairly certain all the locals would have noticed at least a few of the children and teachers who were slaughtered around town.

Regardless it would have been a terrible movie that gives one nightmares. Horrible screenplay.

Watch the documentary on TWA Flight 800 on Netflix, it's a real eye-opener. The government has no problem intimidating or ignoring hundreds of witnesses, manipulating/destroying evidence and just flat out lying, and media is all too happy to go along with it. They also have unlimited funding to make the truth whatever they want it be, paid for by me and you.
 
The figures were as reported from local law enforcement agencies. The chart simply compiles data they provided to the FBI.

A thought. Newtown was in December. Perhaps the paperwork reporting crimes did not reach the FBI offices until after New Years and were counted in 2013? Or maybe they just don't participate in the program?

So you are saying all the data reached the FBI with exception only to homicides and robberies?

Newtown 27,904 7 0 5 0 2 185 32 151 2 1

However there is this, but perhaps the FBI is aware of something local government is not?


Connecticut (throughout all of Connecticut):
Murder3 143
3 Includes 27 victims of Newtown mass shooting
...
Middlesex County:
Murder3 29
3 Does NOT include 27 victims of Newtown mass shooting (see State Police Misc.)
...
Newtown:
Murder3 0
3 Does NOT include 27 victims of Newtown mass shooting (see State Police Misc.)
...
State Police Misc:
Murder3 27
Includes 27 victims of Newtown mass shooting

See pp. 25, 33, 245, 415: http://www.dpsdata.ct.gov/dps/ucr/data/2012/Crime In Connecticut COMPLETE 2012.pdf
 
Last edited:
I don't know, I don't think the gov't is nearly as competent as conspiracy theorists make them out to be. I mean, they obviously do a lot of shady stuff, but to think that everything is by design is absurd.
 
I don't know, I don't think the gov't is nearly as competent as conspiracy theorists make them out to be. I mean, they obviously do a lot of shady stuff, but to think that everything is by design is absurd.

The shadow government is.
 
I don't know, I don't think the gov't is nearly as competent as conspiracy theorists make them out to be. I mean, they obviously do a lot of shady stuff, but to think that everything is by design is absurd.

Oh, yes. Absolutely.

The federal government should handle everything because state and local governments are amateurish and could be racist and because individuals aren't called public servants so of course none of us can have an unselfish bone in our bodies so only the federal government can do any of this in a trustworthy manner but of course the federal government is made up of humans like the rest of us and it isn't fair of us to expect them to be perfect but it couldn't have done this thing out of malice because we all know it never does anything right and there's no way to have so many people in on something and keep them all quiet even if Snowden is in Russia and Assange is in jail on trumped up charges and a few high profile madames are dead of hot lead poisoning but the federal government couldn't have done that either because it's too messy and amateurish and therefore the federal government types who took the fall had to be 'off the reservation' because otherwise the federal government which never does anything right would have been more professional and no one would have been caught.

Watergate not withstanding but of course that doesn't count because Nixon was a Republican and a crazy one too so all this stuff that started under Dubya and is still going on had to have become a mercenary operation or Obama would have been honorable for once and given the Nobel back because somethings are sacred and a peace prize committee started a hundred years ago by an arms manufacturer couldn't possibly be corrupted that would just be wrong and would mean millions of secular humanists have misplaced faith and if that were true surely the New York Times would have made that news fit.

Besides I didn't see it on CNN so it isn't true.

Relax, pessimist. You're on RPFs now. You can stop tying yourself in knots trying to make all the excuses make sense and look at the evidence honestly. Of course, it might convert you from a cockeyed optimist in pessimist's clothing to an honest person--so honest that to thine own self you might even be true--but that's the risk you take coming here.

The cognitive dissonance required to still believe in this system at this late date makes me dizzy. We should all do this once in a while; now I know why the people still trying to desperately believe in this government all wear the same expression as a kitten chasing its tail.
 
Last edited:
Either Newton, Connecticut is a CIA run town filled with paid actors who are following a script, or the people 'allegedly' (:rolleyes:) killed by a deranged lunatic are actually dead, because I am fairly certain all the locals would have noticed at least a few of the children and teachers who were slaughtered around town.

Regardless it would have been a terrible movie that gives one nightmares. Horrible screenplay.

Why does the entire town need to be in on it? Apparently all of the victim families had purchase dates on their houses that were the same - it happened to be a database default, but what are the chances that all of the families had their purchase date set to the database default?

An example of how this could have happened was that some of these families may have lost their children a long time ago, and they were about to lose their house and become homeless and the CIA approached them and offered them a new life in a "New Town" with a new house - just provide the CIA with a picture of their child at around age 6 or 7... then perhaps right before the tragedy some of these families were given air conditioned bungalos and private chefs on a private island near the Bahamas, while the families involved in crisis acting were left to their job after the tragedy. I have no idea how it actually went down, I'm just saying it's not that hard to find people desperate enough to participate in this sort of thing especially when the had no idea what they were participating in.
 
Why does the entire town need to be in on it? Apparently all of the victim families had purchase dates on their houses that were the same - it happened to be a database default, but what are the chances that all of the families had their purchase date set to the database default?

An example of how this could have happened was that some of these families may have lost their children a long time ago, and they were about to lose their house and become homeless and the CIA approached them and offered them a new life in a "New Town" with a new house - just provide the CIA with a picture of their child at around age 6 or 7... then perhaps right before the tragedy some of these families were given air conditioned bungalos and private chefs on a private island near the Bahamas, while the families involved in crisis acting were left to their job after the tragedy. I have no idea how it actually went down, I'm just saying it's not that hard to find people desperate enough to participate in this sort of thing especially when the had no idea what they were participating in.

97% of federal cases end in a guilty plea. It ends this way because individuals become desperate when confronted with the power of the state. That number says quite a lot about the mind of an individual living within the AmeriKan system. It says much about the lengths they will go to.
 
Okay, put on your critical thinking hat. Which is more likely:

1. The government engaged in a massive conspiracy involving hundreds of people to stage a fake massacre but they expose the whole thing by not reporting the deaths on some obscure bureaucratic report; or
2. There are flaws in the way the government compiles and reports statistics.

Or #3. Police killings are not counted as murders or Homicides.
And a cop tripped over his dick and shot up a school.

Not counted.

or #4. Government created community. and there were no children.. except on paper for federal funding.

This is admittedly Speculation.
but that happens when the Media produced story is highly questionable.
 
Hey guys, maybe a person occasionally loses his shit and goes on a killing spree and the government is just incompetent...

Yes, they had the first responding police officers park 1/4 mile away and didn't allow the medical crews in the school at all because of incompetence... They didn't fly in any trauma helicopters because of incompetence... They had an active shooter drill planned that day, and they still did all of this, because of incompetence...

At some point when you start researching this stuff, these views you are espousing seem more incompetent than government.
 
ALEX JONES REALLY IS BILL HICKS
by MackQuigley

Alex Jones’ beginning? Alex Jones’ career did not spontaneously begin on his own initiative with an Austin talk radio and local cable access program, as he has alleged.

Rather, his career actually began with Sacred Cow Productions – a multi-media company founded by musician/writer Kevin Booth and comedian/entertainer/actor Bill Hicks.

bLhjwJt.gif


Bill Hicks’ career was stalled in stand-up and he began trying to take new career directions – including ‘conspiracy‘ theories. At the time of his alleged death he was ranting about the Waco massacre. Then two years later “Alex Jones” shows up at the same spot as the new ‘right-wing hero’ by championing the Waco Branch Davidians by helping them rebuild their church.

But this article will show proof that that was just Bill Hicks under the guise of a new persona – the result of plastic surgery, testosterone, growth hormone, larynx surgery, and cosmetics. Evidence indicates that Bill Hicks transitioned himself into a new ‘right wing’ talk-radio conspiracy-minded shock jock just as some in government were raising the alarm about Timothy McVeigh ‘lone wolf’ type domestic terrorists. Also it was the advent of the internet-era and so the timing was perfect to insert a glib provoking-agent into the ‘militia’ scene – someone who could get out front and the lead patriots around in circles. And so Bill Hicks apparently went to work for the CIA as Alex Jones, their new ‘infowarrior’.

1. Physical evidence proves Alex is really Bill Hicks:
– Teeth exactly match.

Examine carefully – this is forensic proof that the individuals are one and the same.

5CcVnHA.jpg


Alex Jones and Bill Hicks have the same teeth … what are the odds of that ??

WFibbLS.gif

Exact alignment of face and teeth.

- Facial alignment measurements are exactly the same.

TKh2qep.png


– Side facial alignment (profile) also the same.

1m2fJ19.jpg


rDZeqd5.png

Perfect alignment w/plastic surgery. Faces are turned slightly shifting ears.

- Same eye colour (brown).

skgVMHr.jpg



– Same standing height: measured next to Kevin Booth.

icOFlGT.jpg


- Same sitting height: measured next to Dave Prewitt (same Capzeyez studio)

UUZWx5d.jpg



...
http://mackquigley.wordpress.com/2014/07/26/11616/
 
Last edited:
Don't feed the troll derail attempt ^^^^^^^^^^

(wouldnt surprise me at all if Alex used to be Bill though.)
 
I dunno, I've seen early AJ interviews and their voices were a bit different, Bill Hicks had more of that "bweeeuuupppp bbbbweeeeoooo" accent and AJ doesn't really have that at all.
 
I dunno, I've seen early AJ interviews and their voices were a bit different, Bill Hicks had more of that "bweeeuuupppp bbbbweeeeoooo" accent and AJ doesn't really have that at all.

"bweeeuuupppp bbbbweeeeoooo"

My sentiment as well.
 
Oh, yes. Absolutely.

The federal government should handle everything because state and local governments are amateurish and could be racist and because individuals aren't called public servants so of course none of us can have an unselfish bone in our bodies so only the federal government can do any of this in a trustworthy manner but of course the federal government is made up of humans like the rest of us and it isn't fair of us to expect them to be perfect but it couldn't have done this thing out of malice because we all know it never does anything right and there's no way to have so many people in on something and keep them all quiet even if Snowden is in Russia and Assange is in jail on trumped up charges and a few high profile madames are dead of hot lead poisoning but the federal government couldn't have done that either because it's too messy and amateurish and therefore the federal government types who took the fall had to be 'off the reservation' because otherwise the federal government which never does anything right would have been more professional and no one would have been caught.

Watergate not withstanding but of course that doesn't count because Nixon was a Republican and a crazy one too so all this stuff that started under Dubya and is still going on had to have become a mercenary operation or Obama would have been honorable for once and given the Nobel back because somethings are sacred and a peace prize committee started a hundred years ago by an arms manufacturer couldn't possibly be corrupted that would just be wrong and would mean millions of secular humanists have misplaced faith and if that were true surely the New York Times would have made that news fit.

Besides I didn't see it on CNN so it isn't true.

Relax, pessimist. You're on RPFs now. You can stop tying yourself in knots trying to make all the excuses make sense and look at the evidence honestly. Of course, it might convert you from a cockeyed optimist in pessimist's clothing to an honest person--so honest that to thine own self you might even be true--but that's the risk you take coming here.

The cognitive dissonance required to still believe in this system at this late date makes me dizzy. We should all do this once in a while; now I know why the people still trying to desperately believe in this government all wear the same expression as a kitten chasing its tail.

Consolidation/centrallization of power isn't a conspiracy, its the outcome of different individuals naturally trying to acquire power for themselves. Obama isn't in love with executive power, he's in love with HIS power. It always goes in the federal direction because they have the military and the supremacy clause. THis ridiculous idea that every important thing ever is coordinated is just absurd, its not practical.

Don't get me wrong, I believe in conspiracies. But there needs to be a liar/conspirator with something to gain from his lies or crimes or whatever. The fact that ppl do things that we don't like doesn't mean its a conspiracy. There are good, honest ppl who want global communism, that's not a conspiracy, its just their view.
 
Watch the documentary on TWA Flight 800 on Netflix, it's a real eye-opener. The government has no problem intimidating or ignoring hundreds of witnesses, manipulating/destroying evidence and just flat out lying, and media is all too happy to go along with it. They also have unlimited funding to make the truth whatever they want it be, paid for by me and you.

Thanks for the tip. I'm almost through watching it. Interesting.
 
Back
Top