FBI 'raided' Mar-a-Lago


https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1556822256499757060


https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1556840435657621506



Well, there you have it.

I'm forming my opinion in no small part on the outlook of these men.

It now seems clear to me that the former president of the United States has been "Waco'ed", more than likely on orders, and this is just flabbergasting, of the original butchers of the Waco raid, or minions thereof, from over 30 years ago.
 
Well, there you have it.

I'm forming my opinion in no small part on the outlook of these men.

It now seems clear to me that the former president of the United States has been "Waco'ed", more than likely on orders, and this is just flabbergasting, of the original butchers of the Waco raid, or minions thereof, from over 30 years ago.

Was he?

Who died this time?

Sorry. Got no time for, "Pleasepleaseplease believe us when we say we reallyreally hate Trump!"
 
Last edited:
If the following is true, then it may be "mission accomplished", and tossing him in the klink would just be extra gravy.

I don't think there can be any question about this.

All of this is to serve one purpose: to somehow get a felony charge, any felony charge to stick, so as to render Trump legally barred from holding office.

The Marxist left sees his endorsed candidates winning, IIRC his record is 145-11...something in that neighborhood.

They see him polling consistently 4 to 6 points over Biden or other possible Marxists, in 2024.

This can not be allowed to happen
 
I don't think there can be any question about this.

All of this is to serve one purpose: to somehow get a felony charge, any felony charge to stick, so as to render Trump legally barred from holding office.

The Marxist left sees his endorsed candidates winning, IIRC his record is 145-11...something in that neighborhood.

They see him polling consistently 4 to 6 points over Biden or other possible Marxists, in 2024.

This can not be allowed to happen

Uh, yeah, there can certainly be questions. There can always be "any question". Why would they stop him from endorsing RINOs, for example, and how would that accomplish that goal?
 
Last edited:
1. The White House had to find out about the raid via Twitter.
2. The Chief Executive has no authority over executive branch agencies.

https://twitter.com/gartmartin9/status/1556786266469027840
vZUhL0m.png

https://twitter.com/jeffreyatucker/status/1556952424321060866
jqICq4N.png


https://twitter.com/caitoz/status/1556416397596508161
WALLbie.png
 
It's much more important to pontificate about how this, that, and/or the other one is "controlled opposition" - and how everyone (except you) is too misinformed (or blind, or just plain stupid) to perceive or understand what's "really" going on.

Ugh...This has become Mrs AF's debate "style".

It's just as annoying IRL as it is on the intertubes.
 
Ugh...This has become Mrs AF's debate "style".

It's just as annoying IRL as it is on the intertubes.

That's what makes this divide and conquer campaign so amazingly successful. Try to combat it without becoming just as annoying, I dare you. Especially when The Question of the Age is, does X really hate Y? We all turn into Thought Police.

Was it a no-knock raid? Flash-bang grenades? Anyone killed? How about dogs? Anyone in jail? Any bogus resisting arrest charges?

Yawn.
 
Last edited:
Oh, look. They want so badly for us to take "our" hand-chosen (by them) figurehead seriously that they tarred and feathered him, just like they do to us. Only the tar ain't hot and the feathers don't tickle. Wish the rest of us could say that about ours.

Can't win freedom and stuff worrying more about what they pretend to do to this pretend conservative than what they're really doing to real people.
 
Last edited:
That's what makes this divide and conquer campaign so amazingly successful.

Just embrace it. IMO we still aren't divided enough. Let's have no more of this muddled, directionless mediocrity. Let the lines be clearly drawn.

We're not there yet, but, I think we're getting there.
 
Just embrace it. IMO we still aren't divided enough. Let's have no more of this muddled, directionless mediocrity. Let the lines be clearly drawn.

We're not there yet, but, I think we're getting there.

Yes. But I draw my own lines. And people who prefer officially approved soap operas to reality, whether they call poison medicine or stooges "persecuted saviors", don't wind up on my side of my lines.
 
Last edited:
Just embrace it. IMO we still aren't divided enough. Let's have no more of this muddled, directionless mediocrity. Let the lines be clearly drawn.

We're not there yet, but, I think we're getting there.

Divided we stand. United we fall.
 
Divided we stand. United we fall.

If you try to stand with people who will fall for just anything, yes. It can certainly work out that way.

We all love to laugh at the progs for being so programmable. But will you laugh when the chips are labeled "drag shows for kids" and "search warrant"?

npc_update.jpg


Never served a search warrant on an ex-president before. That precedent should have been set back when it might have done some good. I couldn't possibly care less which of those alleged 'parties' didn't think of it first.
 
Last edited:
FROM: https://www.politico.com/newsletter...-the-raid-gop-torches-fbi-hugs-trump-00050476

WHO SIGNED THE WARRANT? — A “source said FBI agents obtained a search warrant from a federal magistrate judge in West Palm Beach,” report the Miami Herald’s Alex Roarty, Michael Wilner and Jay Weaver. According to its website, the West Palm Beach location of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida has three Magistrates: Judge BRUCE REINHART, Judge WILLIAM MATTHEWMAN and Judge RYON MCCABE. The court’s online database shows two recent warrant applications, both assigned to Reinhart, were entered into its system on Monday, though information about the targets of those warrants is sealed.

FROM: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article214210674.html

[Jeffrey] Epstein also hired Bruce Reinhart, then an assistant U.S. attorney in South Florida, now a U.S. magistrate. He left the U.S. Attorney’s Office on Jan. 1, 2008, and went to work representing Epstein’s employees on Jan. 2, 2008, court records show. In 2011, Reinhart was named in the Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit, which accused him of violating Justice Department policies by switching sides, implying that he leveraged inside information about Epstein’s investigation to curry favor with Epstein.

Reinhart, in a sworn declaration attached to the CVRA case, denied the allegation, saying he did not participate in Epstein’s criminal case and “never learned any confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter.’’

The U.S. Attorney’s Office has since disputed that, saying in court papers that he did possess confidential information about the case.

Contacted for this story, Reinhart, in an email, said he never represented Epstein — only Epstein’s pilots; his scheduler, Sarah Kellen; and Nadia Marcinkova, described by some victims as Epstein’s sex slave. Reinhart also pointed out that a complaint filed against him by victims’ lawyer Paul Cassell was dismissed by the Justice Department.

qSW4sjq.gif
 
Contacted for this story, Reinhart, in an email, said he never represented Epstein — only Epstein’s pilots; his scheduler, Sarah Kellen; and Nadia Marcinkova, described by some victims as Epstein’s sex slave. Reinhart also pointed out that a complaint filed against him by victims’ lawyer Paul Cassell was dismissed by the Justice Department.

And the call goes out to abolish the FBI. And the feds say, why not? Plenty more letters in my bowl of alphabet soup.

4D7D16DF-4489-4185-9CDE-0409E071DA67.jpeg
 
Back
Top