FBI Director Comey: No charges recommended for Hillary

[jllundqu]

Wanna hear a joke?

Jim Comey

 

[phill4paul]

Wanna hear a joke?

Jim Comey

Wanna hear a dirty joke?

Hillary Clinton.

 

[Dary]

Wanna hear a joke?

Jim Comey

Comey just didn't want to be Ron Browned or Vince Fostered.

 

[jllundqu]

Comey just didn't want to be Ron Browned or Vince Fostered.

Bullshit. The FBI Director wasn't scared of the Clintons. Something else may be at work, but I highly doubt the man running the most powerful law enforcement service in the world is afraid of cankles.

 

[puppetmaster]

Trump would probably get the Kennedy treatment for sure.

true...or the most intolerant left wing liberals will do it. They always resort to violence when you don't agree with them

 

[01000110]

Bull$#@!. The FBI Director wasn't scared of the Clintons. Something else may be at work, but I highly doubt the man running the most powerful law enforcement service in the world is afraid of cankles.

Like what? Big fat load of cash or something?

 

[kcchiefs6465]

Like what? Big fat load of cash or something?

Give me, "Corrupt Authoritarian piece of Shit" for $500.

 

[Carlybee]

Maybe now some of you will finally wake up to the real danger of allowing Clinton to become President.

Allowing? Like we have a choice either way.

 

[dannno]

Bullshit. The FBI Director wasn't scared of the Clintons. Something else may be at work, but I highly doubt the man running the most powerful law enforcement service in the world is afraid of cankles.

Have you not seen all of the documentaries on the Clinton scandals? They don't do that shit all by themselves.

 

[nikcers]

Dr. Rand Paul (@RandPaul) | Twitter
https://twitter.com/RandPaul
56 mins ago - View on Twitter
I'm just gonna leave this right here.m.washingtontimes.com/new…

Sen. Rand Paul is lone dissenter as James Comey confirmed for FBI post

Mr. Comey overcame a last-minute objection by Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican, who was trying to filibuster the nomination in order to force the FBI to explain its drone surveillance policy. Minutes before Monday’s vote Mr. Paul announced he had gotten more details from the FBI and was dropping his blockade effort.

The 93-1 vote — Mr. Paul was the lone “no” vote — makes Mr. Comey the seventh director of the country’s top law enforcement agency, succeeding Robert S. Mueller III, who served for 12 years — the longest tenure since J. Edgar Hoover.

 

[jllundqu]

Dr. Rand Paul (@RandPaul) | Twitter
https://twitter.com/RandPaul
56 mins ago - View on Twitter
I'm just gonna leave this right here.m.washingtontimes.com/new…

Sen. Rand Paul is lone dissenter as James Comey confirmed for FBI post

[FONT=&][FONT=&]
[/FONT]

Epic

 

[Peace&Freedom]

I called it. I said all along it was a pipe dream to think that a high powered crook like Billary would ever get indited. There is a certain level of power and influence that grants full immunity to all "crimes"...

Under the current establishment, yes, certain high powered crooks don't get indicted. But all the non-Hillary candidates have to do is say is, "that WILL change in six months, if you elect me."


P.S.--Ran across this random YouTube comment, which makes the case for lightening up on a man likely under duress:

i think comey was very brave by coming out and directly stating all the criminal things she did....i feel he was FORCED to state there would be no indictment....they probably threatened to kill every member of his family...every member ....in front of his eyes....he knew his speech would be enough to wake the people up....he stated he was proud of the fbi....face it...they did an awesome investigation.....he stated all the things they found.....and stating the results to the nation was in effect telling everyone she was guilty!....don't blame a man under duress....where is he going to turn for help?????.....i think he is VERY brave....He Told the World She Is Guilty!!!!...He Told The World The System Is Corrupt!!!!...IF THE PEOPLE DON'T WAKE UP NOW THEN AMERICA WILL SEE THE HARLOT RIDE THE WILD BEAST

 

[KEEF]

Ok, I want that dude claiming to be from the FBI to start leaking the stuff he was talking about in that post the other day, and then claim he didn't know it would be illegal to leak these classified FBI files on the Clinton Foundation, etc.

 

[AuH20]

 

[devil21]

And then she hopped aboard Air Force One with Obama, flew down to my city and had dinner at a bbq joint literally around the corner from my house. Brazen!

 

[cajuncocoa]

//

 

[Suzanimal]

Oh, please. Gen Petraeus got a slap on the wrist and a sweet new gig.

 

[euphemia]

Petraeus engaged in pillow talk and left his calendar out. He didn't make a dime from it. Hillary mishandled state secrets and made a mint selling favors to hostile nations.

 

[Son_of_Liberty90]

I'm arguing with a Hilary worshiper on facebook. Please help refute!

It was not illegal at the time dude. It is now. Again, the rules were changed/specified in 2014. You don't actually give a shit about ethics, you just hate Hillary Clinton.

Once again, Hillary has been cleared by a REPUBLICAN-led investigation. And once again, her hardcore haters will ignore it."Gross negligence" is different from ordinary negligence. That means willful or wanton exposure of others to a risk.Like · Reply · Just now

OIG report specifically faults Powell, and many of Condoleezza Rice's top aides, for this as well.Like · Reply · Just now

Her actions, chiefly her use of pvt IT and the SS as guards, indicate diligence. Thus, she was not indifferent to a risk.Powell had emails w/ classified info sent to his home laptop.

She had three separate IT firms guarding the data at her personal expense. On the one occasion foreign hackers *tried* to breach the server, her IT shut it down and notified the State Dept.

She was careless, but not careless beyond the boundaries of typical State Dept employee. And with that, I say good night.

 

[AuH20]

i'm arguing with a Hilary fan on facebook. Please help refute!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-05/clinton-case-obama-administration-nullifies-6-criminal-laws

18 U.S. Code § 2232 — Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure
(a) Destruction or Removal of Property To Prevent Seizure
Whoever, before, during, or after any search for or seizure of property by any person authorized to make such search or seizure, knowingly destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of preventing or impairing the Government’s lawful authority to take such property into its custody or control or to continue holding such property under its lawful custody and control, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) Impairment of In Rem Jurisdiction
Whoever, knowing that property is subject to the in rem jurisdiction of a United States court for purposes of civil forfeiture under Federal law, knowingly and without authority from that court, destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of impairing or defeating the court’s continuing in rem jurisdiction over the property, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 1512 — Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
(c) Whoever corruptly
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 1519 — Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 2071 — Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 641 — Public money, property or records
Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use, or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States or any department or agency thereof, …
Shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years or both. …

18 U.S. Code § 793 — Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information …
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer —
Shall be fined not more than $10, 000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. (g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy, shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.