[Fake News] Freedom Caucus Not Holding the Line, Fall to 18 No's on AHCA

Which means that the moderate no's have a place at the table, next to the freedom caucus no's.

Best case scenario, is an up/down repeal vote of obamacare. The rest will have to be done piecemeal. There is no other option, if they do nothing, the blame democrats feel for obamacare gets spread around a little, if they pass trumpcare, costs will make it just as unpopular...
 
WTLaw said:
Which means that the moderate no's have a place at the table, next to the freedom caucus no's.
Click to expand...
If the four others that have stated themselves as solid "no" then it will be close . . . closest in US history?.

- or - all it takes is a handful of GOP "present" votes (not a yes but counts to what number is a majority)
 
Bill is dead. If it somehow gets through, it's dead in the Senate. Repugs can't find 5 votes from dems in the Senate.
 
AuH20 said:
Bill is dead. If it somehow gets through, it's dead in the Senate. Repugs can't find 5 votes from dems in the Senate.
Click to expand...

President Donald will cut a deal with Cuck Schumer and Mitch has already said he will ram it through.
 
I think there should be a notification to the author of the OP when a thread title is changed without permission. Why was my thread changed to "[FAKE NEWS]"?? I sourced it and it was reported plainly.... obviously the numbers were wrong, but did a CNBC reporter not claim those numbers?
[MENTION=2]Bryan[/MENTION] [MENTION=1874]Brian4Liberty[/MENTION] mods? anyone?

That really pisses me off.
 
jllundqu said:
I think there should be a notification to the author of the OP when a thread title is changed without permission. Why was my thread changed to "[FAKE NEWS]"?? I sourced it and it was reported plainly.... obviously the numbers were wrong, but did a CNBC reporter not claim those numbers?
@Bryan @Brian4Liberty mods? anyone?

That really pisses me off.
Click to expand...

I'm with you. Actually the reports I saw showed several members of the Freedom Caucus by name were supporting the bill. There were several moderates against the bill. The idea that all the FC stood strong has no evidence from what I've seen. It was a perfect storm that killed it.
 
jllundqu said:
I think there should be a notification to the author of the OP when a thread title is changed without permission. Why was my thread changed to "[FAKE NEWS]"?? I sourced it and it was reported plainly.... obviously the numbers were wrong, but did a CNBC reporter not claim those numbers?
[MENTION=2]Bryan[/MENTION] [MENTION=1874]Brian4Liberty[/MENTION] mods? anyone?

That really pisses me off.
Click to expand...

Normally something is changed to add a "[disputed]". Titles are sometimes changed but when they are there is generally a [ ] markup added so everyone knows. This policy has worked well given the current tech we have in place. Your issue has otherwise been noted for future consideration. Thanks.
 
Bryan said:
Normally something is changed to add a "[disputed]". Titles are sometimes changed but when they are there is generally a [ ] markup added so everyone knows. This policy has worked well given the current tech we have in place. Your issue has otherwise been noted for future consideration. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Gee, OP wants to defend regurgitating obvious fake news getting designated as [Fake News] (?)

GOP Revolt Sinks Bid to Void Health Law

I respectfully submit that any obvious fake news gets moved to some obscure corner like Hot Topics so no one sees the bullchit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top