Facebook Zuckerberg’s Funding Behind “Fact Checkers” Spreading Disinfo on Ivermectin

[James_Madison_Lives]

Facebook Zuckerberg’s Funding Behind “Fact Checkers” Spreading Disinfo on Ivermectin

https://coronanews123.wordpress.com...ading-disinfo-that-ivermectin-is-ineffective/

Facebook Zuckerberg’s Funding Behind “Fact Checkers” Spreading Disinfo That Ivermectin Is Ineffective

At first it seems to be an innocuous enough website which wrongly seems intent on suppressing, still, the idea that Ivermectin could possibly do any good in Japan or anywhere else against Covid..Although as Dr. Mike Yeadon says this is well put to bed. It works, it is cheap and it is effective.

Anything to the contrary is in effect killing people.(See: ICU Nurse: People Who Died of COVID “Should Be Considered Murdered” by Withholding Safe, Non-Vax Remedies)

The interesting part comes with a little poking into exactly who FullFact.org is. It’s top funder is Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, one of Great Reset driver Klaus Schwab most important footsoldiers, whose avowed policy is to squash anything negative about the Covid injections, even if it is true.

These are the vaccines which provide the impetus toward universal ID’s, tied into a global database, so governments know where yo are and what you are doing at the stroke of a few keys, at all times.

Remember it was Schwab who wrote in his 2013 book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution:

“Any package, pallet or container can now be equipped with a sensor, transmitter or radio frequency identification (RFID) tag that allows a company to track where it is as it moves through the supply chain—how it is performing, how it is being used, and so on….In the near future, similar monitoring systems will also be applied to the movement and tracking of people.” [emphasis added]

No secret. No conspiracy theory. It’s all right out in the open.



Below: Full Fact funding

Zuckerberg at Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum, Davos, Switzerland, 2017

Below: ICU Nurse: People Who Died of COVID “Should Be Considered Murdered” by Withholding Safe, Non-Vax Remedies


Inventor of mRNA Vaccines Says Fauci Killed 500,000 People by Deliberately Blocking Life-Savers Ivermectin/HCQ.”

 

[Anti Globalist]

What isn't Facebook and Zuckerberg funding?

 

[James_Madison_Lives]

What isn't Facebook and Zuckerberg funding?

Like the ICU nurse says, 80% of people who have died of covid have died unnecessarily, because people like Zuckerberg have been spreading misinfo about Ivermectin and HCQ. Even the FDA's OWN WEBPAGE links to studies on Ivermectin which show it works. So Zuckerberg is a murdering little piece of shit.


FDA’s Own Cited Studies Show Ivermectin Works, Pandemic Was Manufactured


FDA November 2021 Ivermectin page. (Web archive of FDA Ivermectin page as it appeared on Nov. 11, 2021)
“Clinical Trials” page link on FDA Ivermectin page (PDF archive of “Clinical Trials” page as it appeared on Nov. 11, 2021)

Below: From FDA Ivermectin page, Nov. 11, 2021


Below: Image of page which comes up when “Clinical Trials” is clicked on FDA Ivermectin page
c


The studies range in date from mid-2020 into mid-2021, as the FDA and Dr. Fauci maintain their hard positions against using Ivermectin in any way for COVID. Meanwhile, thousands of mostly elderly have died for lack of treatment.
Although overwhelming science has been cataloged which shows Ivermectin reduces COVID mortality by as much as 80%, no US or any other media outlet has bothered to mention that many of the studies are pinned to the FDA’s own webpage. Instead, the media picks up on the false implication, made recently that Ivermectin is only for livestock.
Below: FDA tweet on Ivermectin



Ivermectin is a Nobel Prize-winning drug which has been in use for humans for various ailments, for decades. Declines in COVID mortality on the order of 80% would have meant no pandemic.
Following are the conclusions of the studies listed in the FDA list of sources for its own position. However the linked studies do not support that position, that “available data do not show Ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.” The linked studies support the opposite. Presently there are 81 studies listed, but only a handful have “results available.” The ones that do all show that Ivermectin works, a sampling below.
Again, lest charges of “misinformation” lie waiting in the wings, in the following section these studies are all referenced by the FDA’s own website.


1. “Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of adding ivermectin to treatment in severe COVID-19 patients”

Conclusion: “According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.”


2. “The effect of early treatment with ivermectin on viral load, symptoms and humoral response in patients with non-severe COVID-19: A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial”
Conclusion: “The positive signal found in this pilot warrants the conduction of larger trials using ivermectin for the early treatment of COVID-19.Such trials should include patients with risk factors for severe diseaseas well as patients with pneumonia. The potential for a mechanism of action different to direct antiviral effect also opens the door for preexposure prophylaxis in high-risk groups.”

3. “Safety and Efficacy of the combined use of ivermectin, dexamethasone, enoxaparin and aspirin against COVID 19”


Conclusion: “we consider IDEA protocol to be a scientifically based, low-cost treatment and sustainable healthcare strategy with a favorable benefit-risk ratio, based on the results reported in this article: reduction in overall mortality to one fourth, reduction in mortality of hospitalized patients to one eighth and no progression of mild cases to moderate or severe cases.”

4. “Use of Ivermectin as a Potential Chemoprophylaxis for COVID-19 in Egypt: A Randomized Clinical Trial”

Conclusion: “Ivermectin is suggested to be a promising effective chemoprophylactic drug against COVID-19. Ivermectin is inexpensive, available and quite safe drug. As this is the first report regarding use of ivermectin in COVID-19 prophylaxis, it is very appropriate to promptly and rigorously study this drug further.”

5. “Effectiveness of Ivermectin as add-on Therapy in COVID-19 Management (Pilot Trial)”

Conclusion: “The mean time to stay in the hospital was significantly lower in IVM group compared with the controls…Add-on use of IVM to HCQ and AZT had better effectiveness, shorter hospital stay, and relatively safe compared with controls. however, a larger prospective study with longer follow up may be needed to validate these results.”
6. The broad spectrum host-directed agent ivermectin as an antiviral for SARS-CoV-2 ?

“Close to 70 clinical trials are currently in progress worldwide for SARS-CoV-2. Although few of these studies have been completed, the results that are available, as well as those from observational/retrospective studies, indicate clinical benefit.”