Facebook is blocking Ben Swann's 'Rethinking 9/11' as abusive content?

[green73]

 

[eduardo89]

That happens when you copy/paste it about 100 times on different walls, groups, and pages. It's automated and not censorship. Just change a word or two in your post and it will work.

 

[green73]

That happens when you copy/paste it about 100 times on different walls, groups, and pages. It's automated and not censorship. Just change a word or two in your post and it will work.

It becomes abusive?

 

[eduardo89]

It becomes abusive?

It gets automatically marked as spam. If you're copy/pasting something 100 times you're likely spamming.

 

[green73]

It gets automatically marked as spam. If you're copy/pasting something 100 times you're likely spamming.

I don't know how it works because I avoid that shithole like the plague, but the claim is "abusive content".

 

[ZENemy]

"In a website of lies, the truth is abusive"







Quote inpsired by Ron Paul.

 

[eduardo89]

I don't know how it works because I avoid that shithole like the plague, but the claim is "abusive content".

I've had it happen to me before. Spam is considered abusive content. It has nothing to do with Ben Swann or 9/11.

 

[green73]

I've had it happen to me before. Spam is considered abusive content. It has nothing to do with Ben Swann or 9/11.

I wonder if Obama's speeches or other mainstream bullshit that goes viral amongst the sheepocracy routinely gets flagged as abusive.

 

[eduardo89]

I wonder if Obama's speeches or other mainstream bullshit that goes viral amongst the sheepocracy routinely gets flagged as abusive.

If a person is posting it 100 times within 20 minutes, yes, most likely it will be flagged.

 

[green73]

If a person is posting it 100 times within 20 minutes, yes, most likely it will be flagged.

Isn't it more likely that enough people flagged it as "abusive". I would think there is a differentiation between spam and something that is abusive. Again, I don't know the particulars of how fedbook runs. Whatever the case, fedbook is fucked up.

 

[Natural Citizen]

"In a website of lies, the truth is abusive

Is why one can never accept terms of service as a replacement for constitution.

 

[Antischism]

Eduardo is right.

 

[green73]

Eduardo is right.

Extreme right, but what does that have to do with this?

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

Oh, I did find this "GEM" of cynicism attack, due to Ron Paul's Facebook statement on 9/11. This stooge @ the AEI, American Enterprise Institutes (NEOCON war machine) doesn't like the truth. BTW, this Twit on Twitter, Danielle Pletka, has been on all the corporate media channels like a revolving door pushing the War Machine/Fear/Security Industrial Complexes, of course to bomb Syria and invade, etc.

Danielle Pletka ‏@dpletka

Charming fella, this Ron Paul: https://www.facebook.com/ronpaul/posts/10152664000901686:0 …

• Reply
• Retweet
• Favorite

• 1 Retweet
• 

2:16 PM - 11 Sep 13

 

[iamse7en]

I've had it happen to me before. Spam is considered abusive content. It has nothing to do with Ben Swann or 9/11.

BS. I don't recall this happening to that propaganda Kony 2012 video that went viral in hours.

 

[ClydeCoulter]

I think Eduardo is saying "IF you Paste the same message all over the place, the same EXACT message over and over and over, it will get flagged" NOT the same video or same article, but the entirety of the message text and link.