Facebook ad against Jon Huntsman?

[coffeewithgames]

Thoughts on the following image for an ad to run against Huntsman:

I have it linked to my original video I made on it earlier tonight:


Thoughts?

 

[The Gold Standard]

Perfect. Send it. To as many people as possible. Preferably Huntsman supporters in New Hampshire.

 

[coffeewithgames]

Perfect. Send it. To as many people as possible. Preferably Huntsman supporters in New Hampshire.

I can target those people directly, with my ad placement. This was done with Santorum in Iowa, don't know how effective it was, but I think this would do more damage to Huntsman, as it's independents that like him supposedly.

 

[Bergie Bergeron]

I can target those people directly, with my ad placement. This was done with Santorum in Iowa, don't know how effective it was, but I think this would do more damage to Huntsman, as it's independents that like him supposedly.

Set up a chip-in ! The sooner this is up and running, the better.

 

[sailingaway]

I think he said he would have SIGNED NDAA, not voted for it. Not that there is much of a distinction, but we should stick with what he said.

 

[coffeewithgames]

Set up a chip-in ! The sooner this is up and running, the better.

I know last time, one set did a chipin for some other ads, I payed for one out of pocket myself...as an experiment.
The idea is that they see "Huntsman likes NDAA" enough, that they start associating it. I'm putting the ad up now, with a $10 buy.

 

[coffeewithgames]

I think he said he would have SIGNED NDAA, not voted for it. Not that there is much of a distinction, but we should stick with what he said.

How's this:

Thanks for the feedback! Much appreciated!

 

[Bergie Bergeron]

Do enough people know what is NDAA?

 

[coffeewithgames]

Do enough people know what is NDAA?

I could link them to my article with both videos instead, but have the same title:
http://www.coffeewithpolitics.com/2012/01/jon-huntsman-supports-ndaa-and-tarp.html

 

[pauliticalfan]

Obama voters in New Hampshire are voting for Huntsman, that's why he's surging. Associating him with Obama in a picture, when most people don't even know what NDAA is, will only hurt us and bolster Huntsman's surge. He's already doing piss-poor among Republicans, it's independents we need to bring him down with.

 

[fmarz1]

needs to have stronger language..."likes NDAA" average user could glance at the ads like me and think it was something positive....the "he supports corporate welfare" language should be throughout......otherwise good job!

 

[JJ2]

Thoughts on the following image for an ad to run against Huntsman:

I have it linked to my original video I made on it earlier tonight:


Thoughts?

The problem is, in today's debate, Huntsman was the one who said: "We've gotta phase out loopholes and deductions in total and we've gotta say so long to corporate welfare and to subsidies, because this country could no longer afford it and we've gotta prepare for competition in the 21st century." (http://presspass.msnbc.msn.com/_new...-read-the-nbc-news-facebook-debate-transcript)

 

[coffeewithgames]

Obama voters in New Hampshire are voting for Huntsman, that's why he's surging. Associating him with Obama in a picture, when most people don't even know what NDAA is, will only hurt us and bolster Huntsman's surge. He's already doing piss-poor among Republicans, it's independents we need to bring him down with.

I thought about this also, but if the Obama supporters don't like NDAA, wouldn't this be a reason to NOT vote for Huntsman?

 

[coffeewithgames]

The problem is, in today's debate, Huntsman was the one who said: "We've gotta phase out loopholes and deductions in total and we've gotta say so long to corporate welfare and to subsidies, because this country could no longer afford it and we've gotta prepare for competition in the 21st century." (http://presspass.msnbc.msn.com/_new...-read-the-nbc-news-facebook-debate-transcript)

That's called a flipflop...the fact is, he supported the original, changing positions when its politically advantageous is what he is doing now.

 

[pauliticalfan]

I thought about this also, but if the Obama supporters don't like NDAA, wouldn't this be a reason to NOT vote for Huntsman?

I think you're better hitting Huntsman on the wars, not NDAA. I just don't think as many people know about it.

 

[sailingaway]

I think it should just be NDAA. Or NDAA and TARP. Because 'corporate welfare' is probably not a term he said he'd support, I'm sure he called it something else

"John Huntsman said he too would sign NDAA with indefinite detention for US Citizens without trial"

does it for me.

 

[sailingaway]

I think you're better hitting Huntsman on the wars, not NDAA. I just don't think as many people know about it.

I think PRECISELY the cross over voters we need do, and it is very black and white.

 

[Bergie Bergeron]

NDAA and TARP.

 

[fmarz1]

That's called a flipflop...the fact is, he supported the original, changing positions when its politically advantageous is what he is doing now.

going with my above post about stronger language....maybe the title should be "Huntsman continues to flip-flop" or something like it.....if someone just glances over it they automativally get the message

 

[JJ2]

That's called a flipflop...the fact is, he supported the original, changing positions when its politically advantageous is what he is doing now.

Yeah, but since he did use those words today, maybe you should specifically say that he supported the "TARP bailout"? I'm just trying to consider which would be most effective.