F I L I B U S T E R !!!!.....Rand Paul in historic moment

[The Northbreather]

The law recognizes that a man has a reasonable expectation of privacy. It goes back centuries into law.

Curtilage is the immediate, enclosed area surrounding a house or dwelling. The U.S. Supreme Court noted in United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987), that curtilage is the area immediately surrounding a residence that "harbors the `intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life.'' Curtilage, like a house, is protected under the fourth amendment from "unreasonable searches and seizures.''

Determining the boundaries of curtilage is imprecise and subject to controversy. Four of the factors used to dtermine whether to classify the area as curtilage include:

1) The distance from the home to the place claimed to be curtilage (the closer the home is, the more likely to be curtilage);

2) Whether the area claimed to be curtilage is included within an enclosure surrounding the home;

3) The nature of use to which the area is put (if it is the site of domestic activities, it is more likely to be a part of the curtilage); and

4) The steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by people passing by (shielding from public view will favor finding the portion is curtilage).

 

[The Northbreather]

They already do. And as the technology becomes cheaper and cheaper more and more will. Rand Paul also has mentioned that people need to ask themselves if they want to live in a police state, in a surveillance state, and if they were willing to sacrifice liberty for security.

I'm not slighting Rand here I'm just trying to define and enhance and focus the discussion.

 

[bolil]

I am kind of amazed at his stamina. That rubio water sip suddenly looks even more pathetic.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

The law recognizes that a man has a reasonable expectation of privacy. It goes back centuries into law.

Curtilage is the immediate, enclosed area surrounding a house or dwelling. The U.S. Supreme Court noted in United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987), that curtilage is the area immediately surrounding a residence that "harbors the `intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life.'' Curtilage, like a house, is protected under the fourth amendment from "unreasonable searches and seizures.''

Determining the boundaries of curtilage is imprecise and subject to controversy. Four of the factors used to dtermine whether to classify the area as curtilage include:

1) The distance from the home to the place claimed to be curtilage (the closer the home is, the more likely to be curtilage);

2) Whether the area claimed to be curtilage is included within an enclosure surrounding the home;

3) The nature of use to which the area is put (if it is the site of domestic activities, it is more likely to be a part of the curtilage); and

4) The steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by people passing by (shielding from public view will favor finding the portion is curtilage).

Rand Paul has stated that he holds the same view as I. That you own the airspace above your home. I am not certain but I believe this was reaffirmed by the courts as well. I'm against the invasion of privacy as much as the next man, and as much as Rand Paul is. He stated that the courts will have to etch out a policy guaranteeing Americans privacy from this technology.

 

[V4Vendetta]

Look at what Senator Paul started! Goes to show a little guts goes a long way, especially when the timid decide to join, after they see the example.

 

[coastie]

Look at what Senator Paul started! Goes to show a little guts goes a long way, especially when the timid decide to join, after they see the example.

10 hours, 18 minutes as of this post...

 

[Legend1104]

Ted Cruz up there now reading tweets.

 

[Reason]

STAND WITH RAND

 

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

The law recognizes that a man has a reasonable expectation of privacy. It goes back centuries into law.

Curtilage is the immediate, enclosed area surrounding a house or dwelling. The U.S. Supreme Court noted in United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987), that curtilage is the area immediately surrounding a residence that "harbors the `intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life.'' Curtilage, like a house, is protected under the fourth amendment from "unreasonable searches and seizures.''

Determining the boundaries of curtilage is imprecise and subject to controversy. Four of the factors used to dtermine whether to classify the area as curtilage include:

1) The distance from the home to the place claimed to be curtilage (the closer the home is, the more likely to be curtilage);

2) Whether the area claimed to be curtilage is included within an enclosure surrounding the home;

3) The nature of use to which the area is put (if it is the site of domestic activities, it is more likely to be a part of the curtilage); and

4) The steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by people passing by (shielding from public view will favor finding the portion is curtilage).

In order to be a Democratic Republic of United States, we no longer live by legal precedence. Our founders bypassed legal precedence with natural law. As the church recognized the authority of a king to rule, it also recognized the scientific method of natural law. I think I've tried pointing out this subtle point about a thousand times in here.
Legal precedence was abolished when our Founders established our Democratic Republic of United States. During that time, we weren't under the reign of a king until we elected our first president.

 

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

Rand Paul has stated that he holds the same view as I. That you own the airspace above your home. I am not certain but I believe this was reaffirmed by the courts as well. I'm against the invasion of privacy as much as the next man, and as much as Rand Paul is. He stated that the courts will have to etch out a policy guaranteeing Americans privacy from this technology.

The commercial media is different from the press. As the commercial media have existed prior to our Founders as they were once deployed by the monarchy as traveling "sayers," having been equipped with a royal decree, to troubadour about the kingdom reminding all the commoner people how it was the king who legally owned all the land while they themselves owned nothing. In contrast, the freedom of the press is a right of the people to write out their own propaganda reminding the king that it is actually they who own all the land and the wealth while he or she is a trespassing borrower.
Therefore, the sky belongs to the people.
Even better, the sky belongs to the people by natural right.

 

[Philhelm]

Dare I say, Rand Paul 2016?

Edit: Ron Paul 2012 would have been better, and Ron Paul 2008 would be better still. In all my life, I never had a hero; not actors or sports stars, but with Ron Paul I found a genuine Hero of the Republic.

 

[jim49er]

Ted Cruz is awesome.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Has Rand started reading from a phone book like they did in the old days of fillibustering? /curious

 

[heavenlyboy34]

The commercial media is different from the press. As the commercial media have existed prior to our Founders as they were once deployed by the monarchy as traveling "sayers," having been equipped with a royal decree, to troubadour about the kingdom reminding all the commoner people how it was the king who legally owned all the land while they themselves owned nothing. In contrast, the freedom of the press is a right of the people to write out their own propaganda reminding the king that it is actually they who own all the land and the wealth while he or she is a trespassing borrower.
Therefore, the sky belongs to the people.
Even better, the sky belongs to the people by natural right.

There never has been total freedom of the press. Exceptions to this freedom are/were slander and libel.

 

[shane77m]

I think the server crashed. I can't get on to watch. I could earlier.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

Has Rand started reading from a phone book like they did in the old days of fillibustering? /curious

No. He has continued with pertinent information and news stories of presidential abuse. It really is amazing how well versed he is.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

No. He has continued with pertinent information and news stories of presidential abuse. It really is amazing how well versed he is.

cool beans. It'd be nice if that got some airplay in MSM.

 

[coastie]

Has Rand started reading from a phone book like they did in the old days of fillibustering? /curious

No, just hammering home the seriousness of the subject at hand. If anything, he should read from the Paul Family Cookbook, if it comes down to it. Win win, ya know?

I think the server crashed. I can't get on to watch. I could earlier.

It's back up...

No. He has continued with pertinent information and news stories of presidential abuse. It really is amazing how well versed he is.

 

[Uriah]

over 700,000 likes on Facebook!!!

 

[jim49er]

Read the cookbook. I love it coastie