F I L I B U S T E R !!!!.....Rand Paul in historic moment

Rubio--keep water handy.

Rand--forced but good natured laugh.

Rubio is trying hard to jump on this bandwagon. He's really trying hard. Rand is the Defender of the Seperation of Powers (though Rubio didn't use that phrase--maybe he skipped Civics Class that day)...
 
Great work ya Rube. :rolleyes:

Rubio comes in and it starts getting emotional -surprise.

David_the_office_28uk_29_36881_1024_768.jpg
 
Last edited:
interesting weather in DC now....good timing...hahaha...

you guys are gonna get snowed in now. May as well help Rand out.


HAGERSTOWN, Md. (AP) — After pummeling the nation's midsection with heavy snow, a late-winter storm made its way Wednesday to the nation's capital, where residents braced for the possibility of power outages.

As the storm closed in, the federal government said its offices in the Washington, D.C., area would be closed Wednesday. Many major school systems around Washington and Baltimore announced pre-emptive closures as well.
 
Rubio definitely wants a little bit of that spotlight, hope people see through it.

It's really awesome that Rand is doing this. This question should have been answered without hesitation the first time it was asked.
 
ronaldo23 said:
LOL at rubio trying to get face time since he knows Rand is getting tons of publicity for this
Click to expand...
Yeah I noticed that too... Like, What is this Aspen Institute marionette Marco Rubio doing on this filibuster floor, he's such political slime.


Rand quoting from Glenn Greenwald articles...
 
Last edited:
Sorry if this has been discussed elsewhere on this forum but if you read what Holder wrote, he said very specifically that there may be rare situations where using a drone to kill on US soil is warranted. I can imagine dozens of scenarios where this might be the case. The drone is ultimately just a very advanced gun. Why make such a huge fuss over this? I am certainly against using any weapon on a noncombatant but if there were hostile, armed forces firing on US citizens on US soil, why not use drones if that would serve best?

Please, I'm only trying to rationalize this out in my mind. Enlighten me at your discretion.
 
Last edited:
freejack said:
Sorry if this has been discussed elsewhere on this forum but if you read what Holder wrote, he said very specifically that there may be rare situations where using a drone to kill on US soil is warranted. I can imagine dozens of scenarios where this might be the case. The drone is ultimately just a very advanced gun. Why make such a huge fuss over this? I am certainly against using any weapon on a noncombatant but if there were hostile, armed forces firing on US citizens on US soil, why not use drones if that would serve best?

Please, I'm only trying to rationalize this out in my mind. Enlighten me at your discretion.
Click to expand...

I'm trying to find Rand's quote from today about government military action, the oath sworn by reps and soldiers, and trampling the Bill of Rights.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Liberty_Tree
Evidence Indicates that, Like Oswald, John Wilkes Booth Was Part of Wider Conspiracy
Replies
3
Views
2K
oyarde
O
osan
Brunson v. Adams: Read This Most Interesting Case
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
jbnevin
jbnevin
C
LAND-MINE LEGISLATION - Claire Wolfe
Replies
16
Views
2K
CCTelander
C
donnay
The Meaning of Life (Part I)
Replies
5
Views
344
timosman
timosman
J
June 8, Remember America's Forgotten Heroes, Men Killed in Israel's attack on The USS Liberty
Replies
15
Views
4K
Raginfridus
Raginfridus
Back
Top