Extremely angry Romney supporter

How does one take hours upon hours on "finding information" about Romney to make videos about?
 
Don't go to this website dot com

Oh, no. Not this lady. Do not feed this troll - not only is she from my state, she is from my town. I tried to talk some sense into her back in '11 - when she was all aboard the Cain train. If that doesn't describe her properly - remember the Pokemon poem? She thought I was lying when I pointed that out - I met her at a local 9-12 meeting. Even then, she simply hated Ron Paul.

That's it - there's only two things left to say. One, please break that link, Angela. (It would be wise to remove it altogether.) Two, the author of this blog is well beyond salvaging. She possesses the mental capacity of a baboon.

Leave this one alone.
 
Last edited:
Oh, no. Not this lady. Do not feed this troll - not only is she from my state, she is from my town. I tried to talk some sense into her back in '11 - when she was all about the Cain train. I met her at a local 9-12 meeting. Even then, she simply hated Ron Paul.

That's it - there's only two things left to say. One, please break that link, Angela. (It would be wise to remove it altogether.) Two, the author of this blog is well beyond salvaging. She possesses the mental capacity of a baboon.

Leave this one alone.

Sounds like a voice of experience. ha ha. I think I'll take your advice.
 
She's one person.



As opposed to the "retards" that run around calling for open borders, while we have the welfare system in place, or those who express their hatred for the Constitution and everything this country has stood for?

The people doing that here are doing so while opposing suppression of liberty, which is aggressed against on the highest level by the state. This woman, and the GOP base, don't oppose suppression of liberty; they champion it.

I'll close this thought by saying that aggression (welfare state) does not warrant further aggression (restriction of one's right to associate).
 
She IS going to be lurking in this thread. I wouldn't be surprised if she registers an account just to post here. Dug a little through my emails - I'm sure I can find more - to bring further testimony to her crazy. This is from October 2011, speaking about Glenn Beck. At least back then, she was coherent. Good God, Shelly Dankert of Norfolk, Nebraska. You really lost your shit, lady...you sound like my mother. :)


94% of all of the things that Glenn Beck has said WOULD happen, HAVE happened. Know anyone else with that track record? Why do you think he "spit himself out of the system" and is now totally independent from ALL other media? Now he's unleashed and doesn't have to get 'approval" from FOX for what he wants to air.



 
The people doing that here are doing so while opposing suppression of liberty, which is aggressed against on the highest level by the state. This woman, and the GOP base, don't oppose suppression of liberty; they champion it.

I'll close this thought by saying that aggression (welfare state) does not warrant further aggression (restriction of one's right to associate).

You're living in anarchy la la land. Sorry. Mankind has simply not progressed to that point. There are evil bastards out there who want more power and control of every person on the planet. One of their goals in getting there is to get rid of borders, you realize. That is exactly what the various unions around the world are all about. They are the last precursor to world government. To be frank, you are helping them.

The best we can do right now is to carve out a piece of the world and say that we want to live by a certain set of principles. Many people in the world will not agree with us, nor want what we want and that is ok. They can do what they want to do in their piece of the world. We should be able to trade with each other and be friendly and maybe one day, something like you describe might be possible. But, it damn sure isn't right now.
 
so we blame people like them for the future collapse of the country... and they blame us for the future collapse of the country.

haha.

The problem with that is, they've been in power and we haven't.

They want the power without the responsibility.
 
Last edited:
She doesn't care about the country. She cares about the Republican party winning elections.

Ladies and gentleman, your GOP base! Enjoy having Rand pander to these retards in a few years.

Plenty of people care about this country. They are just brain dead when it comes to politics. I just wish they'd stay home on election day.
 
95% of the GOP was going to go with the Republican nominee no matter who it was.

I mean, look, they picked Romney. —He's a guy who voted for an AWB when he was governor and he implemented Obamacare before it went nation-wide. The fear of Obama was so bad they would have voted for Stalin if it were possible, just to get Obama out of office.

But they ignored the statistics on how well Ron Paul did with independents and democrats. These groups were the people who would ultimately tip the scales, and they blew their chance to pick the doctor who could have made a case for those votes.
 
You're living in anarchy la la land. Sorry. Mankind has simply not progressed to that point. There are evil bastards out there who want more power and control of every person on the planet. One of their goals in getting there is to get rid of borders, you realize. That is exactly what the various unions around the world are all about. They are the last precursor to world government. To be frank, you are helping them.

The best we can do right now is to carve out a piece of the world and say that we want to live by a certain set of principles. Many people in the world will not agree with us, nor want what we want and that is ok. They can do what they want to do in their piece of the world. We should be able to trade with each other and be friendly and maybe one day, something like you describe might be possible. But, it damn sure isn't right now.

Because, dear forum reader, you need to read that again ^
 
You're living in anarchy la la land. Sorry. Mankind has simply not progressed to that point. There are evil bastards out there who want more power and control of every person on the planet. One of their goals in getting there is to get rid of borders, you realize. That is exactly what the various unions around the world are all about. They are the last precursor to world government. To be frank, you are helping them.

The best we can do right now is to carve out a piece of the world and say that we want to live by a certain set of principles. Many people in the world will not agree with us, nor want what we want and that is ok. They can do what they want to do in their piece of the world. We should be able to trade with each other and be friendly and maybe one day, something like you describe might be possible. But, it damn sure isn't right now.

Twice.
 
She is from Nebraska?? Ughhh *faceplam* I should put a ron paul sign in her yard
 
Dear Lady,

Please enroll yourself in anger management therapy. We are all not pleased however bringing yourself down to this level does not help your cause.

Once you've been restored or properly medicated I urge you to read the Constitution of the United States. You see, your candidate was for NDAA as well and I am quite certain folks like you who carry on in such a manner will surely be carted off soon.

And please, this is America and the beauty is we all get a voice. I am sorry you don't like the fact that I support a liberty minded candidate but I can assure you I am of a perfectly sound mind.

Be well.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top