Matt Collins
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 47,707
I am a firm believer that elected officials should be held to a higher standard than mundanes. Therefore, I can justify sending Sorenson to prison while the others got probation.
Why do you say that? If these guys really did pay him that amount of money and it was all how this article says it was, why would t we stand up and cheer that at least someone ends up in prison for it?
The principle being that fair elections can't be possible when politicians are being bought and paid for...
Who was harmed in this process?I am a firm believer that elected officials should be held to a higher standard than mundanes. Therefore, I can justify sending Sorenson to prison while the others got probation.


It's not like he was being paid for voting a certain way or introducing / killing legislation. All he did was give his endorsement, which at the end of the day means practically nothing. No one was harmed by it (and I guarantee you every legislator in Iowa was paid off by other campaigns for the same thing; this guy just got caught due to a leak by some crazy guy).
Now, to be fair, this was a tacky and maybe ethically questionable thing to do. Also since it was against the law they should not have done it not because it was hurting anyone, but because we should have wanted to be above reproach.