Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies

Please note, this article was from May 6th

Then it pertains to the previous false claim of the Syrian govt using CW. The first claim, which was preceded by all sorts of western hype about fear that Assad would use CWs, was in December 2012. They keep trying with this angle because it's about all they've got to justify a conventional invasion.
 
Last edited:
I think most here realize this isn't about nerve gas, etc... this is about a US/UK/French covert war, in the planning for years, in it's 3rd year and it's crumbling beofre their eyes. Lord Obama's Empire is not going as planned, Assad's government is kicking terrorist ass, and this is now at the FAILSAFE mechanism to save the last bastions of their psychopathic regional conquering ops.

If this covert/classified insurgent war and all it's operations become revealed, it will expose the evil premeditated war crimes and a Washington DC federal government that has been completely hijacked by special interest and orders of magnitudes of lies and deceit on the American taxpayers/citizens. Washington DC has ALWAYS covered their illegal operations, up to and including the actions of murder. I wonder how far they will go this time?

If they don't hide it ASAP, the whole charade will be revealed to the world. Hopefully Obama's puppet masters are exposed.
 
It's true that WND is not credible, but if their sources are credible use them. I would not promote WND out in the real world as news, because all kinds of people left right and center know that WND just makes stuff up. You can promote THEIR sources and look for corroboration however.

In this case, citing WND can be useful since neocons and hyper-conservatives tend to like them. The two groups we'd most need to reach with this information if it's true.

If you have been following what I've said on the subject, you will know that I believed it was true the moment it happened. I still think it was a real GB (Sarin) attack, and that it was launched by the US Allies.

If this evidence pans out, it will be MIGHTY embarrassing for Obummer, Bill O'Really, Peter Queen, Shammity, and their blood-lusting ilk.

That is exactly why they must strike before the UN team has a chance to check it out. They don't want the truth to ever come out, and if the UN can't ever inspect it then they will just call Syrian government liars and bomb away. Heck, they might bomb the UN inspectors too just for the fun of it.
 
Please note, this article (Post #17) was from May 6th

And from that article,,
“In any case, we don’t have the mechanism to launch these kinds of weapons, which would need missiles that can carry chemical warheads, and we in the FSA do not possess these kind of capabilities,” Mr. Almokdad told CNN.

The video posted shows that they do indeed have the mechanism to launch them.

syrian-rebels.jpg
 
Last edited:
who wants to take bets that a cruise missile will hit this spot to further remove any evidence that might implicate the terrorists
 
who wants to take bets that a cruise missile will hit this spot to further remove any evidence that might implicate the terrorists
I don't think even the US is stupid enough to attack while the UN Teams are there.

They will either bribe the inspectors,, or ignore the report.
 
Déjà vu--Saddam Hussein.

And Milosovic!

http://emperors-clothes.com/Film/judge.htm

http://emperors-clothes.com/yugo.htm

And Gaddafi!

Notice how the entire country is always reduced down to the "leader". Gaddafi is killing his people! Milosovic is committing Genocide! When the entire opposition is said to be one evil person it's easier to demonize.

After Gaddafi was murdered on the side of the road and Cinnabon started opening shops, they had Assad in the crosshairs.

Who's next?
 
Why would we target chemical weapons facilities? Wouldn't that just release all those chemical weapons into the atmosphere? Has anybody actually thought this through?
 
Why would we target chemical weapons facilities? Wouldn't that just release all those chemical weapons into the atmosphere? Has anybody actually thought this through?

Not necessarily, some advanced munitions are designed to burn hot enough to break down chemweapons. The question then becomes targeting, precision, burn radius, OH AND A FREAKING DECLARATION OF WAR. :mad:
 
Back
Top