Everything I hated about my own party all in one candidate called Trump.

Well then see if you can get me banned for it, miss Banhammer.

I'm not trying, nor would I want you banned. Just refuting your comment.

-but you are.
Do you want him to be?

Seriously, what is your litmus test? I ask, because several of you in the lynch mob have accused me of the same. And I have said multiple times, like I should even need to, that I will be voting for Rand if he is on the ballot.
 
Last edited:
I'm not trying, nor would I want you banned. Just refuting your comment.


Do you want him to be?

Seriously, what is your litmus test? I ask, because several of you in the lynch mob have accused me of the same. And I have said multiple times, like I should even need to, that I will be voting for Rand if he is on the ballot.

Yeah, after he made that statement I realize there's no point in talking to him.
 
I'm not trying, nor would I want you banned. Just refuting your comment.


Do you want him to be?

Seriously, what is your litmus test? I ask, because several of you in the lynch mob have accused me of the same. And I have said multiple times, like I should even need to, that I will be voting for Rand if he is on the ballot.
Actually after seeing the Raise of Trump I don't even care. It is just a big happy stupid parade to be laughed at and jeered.
If Rand pulls off an outstanding performance at one of the debates I might get serious again and it is up the Rand not his supporters to turn the campaign around. Until then I am going to laugh at and ridicule the clown and tyrant the Republican party is fawning over.
 
:rolleyes:

...apparently there are still a lot of mental midgets around who haven't figured out that the miserable republican party is peopled by goddamned bickering, warmongering, authoritarian fools...idiots with their gaping doritos chutes frequently open about the 'illion dollar economy' absent an honest f@cking clue as to the origin and nature of even one 'dollar'.. :eek:

...stfu, republicans/crats...:mad:
 
Not enough to make a difference at the presidential level, I'm afraid.

Actually, AF, everyone wants liberty. But the divide and conquer tactics have been going on so long, and have worked so well, that no one wants liberty enough to let everyone else have liberty.

Either that, or they just haven't yet figured out that the only way they can get liberty is to give it to others.
 
Actually, AF, everyone wants liberty. But the divide and conquer tactics have been going on so long, and have worked so well, that no one wants liberty enough to let everyone else have liberty.

Either that, or they just haven't yet figured out that the only way they can get liberty is to give it to others.

Did you just say that????
 
Actually after seeing the Raise of Trump I don't even care. It is just a big happy stupid parade to be laughed at and jeered.
If Rand pulls off an outstanding performance at one of the debates I might get serious again and it is up the Rand not his supporters to turn the campaign around. Until then I am going to laugh at and ridicule the clown and tyrant the Republican party is fawning over.

It's early. At this stage, the people at the top are rarely the ones there at the end.
 
Did you just say that????

Yeah, woman, I said that. And I'll say it again, too.

Everyone knows how much federal overregulation screws up their own business, but no one stands up to federal overregulation of someone else's field. Happens all the time. And not just in the field of business.

Why? You going to lie and say I've ever claimed I should be free to spam breitbart.com at will with criticisms of the class clown without getting banned? Or what?
 
Last edited:
...anyone else have a problem with members of the [stinking] republican party inc. defining 'liberty?'

...these republican 'intellectual' mule-lopers have butchered 'liberty' 'libertarian' etc...ad nauseam

...time to flush the toilet-full of republicans...:mad:
 
Perhaps Trump is paving the way for shiny boy Paul Ryan to step into the race and save the day?
 
Back
Top