Eugene Dokes Posts the "Truth" of What Happened

From his Facebook:
The Propaganda

Anyways, the comments are on our side, even from the Romney and other supporters.

That now links to an article on Breitbart.

Some of our people who attended this deal need to send their account to Breitbart. Specifically, the man who was arrested. Because this is being spun to make us look bad.
 
Last edited:
Does he not realize we have video?

Guys like this don't care. He thinks he can convince people of his version of events solely by refusing to acknowledge reality. It doesn't matter how much video evidence we have; history does not exist as something concrete and immutable for him. History is liquid and changes to suit his needs, and part of him probably believes it in the moment. If he's confronted, his first tactic will be to play the, "Oh, you misunderstand...here's what that video REALLY shows," card. If he can see that won't work with someone, he'll simply slink away and use the same failed arguments with other people. He'll surround himself with sycophants and others who trust him absolutely, and the more friends and associates he manages to convince of his story (you've known me for years; would I lie to you?), the more he will become utterly convinced that he's justified by merit of them reflecting his projected reality back at him...and the more he will become angry and hateful toward the people who refuse to accept his reality. In the face of OVERWHELMING rejection though, he'll really have no choice but to just retreat and do whatever damage control he can.
 
Last edited:
He doesn't care. He thinks he can convince people of his version of events solely by refusing to acknowledge reality. It doesn't matter how much video evidence we have; history does not exist as something concrete and immutable for him. History is liquid and changes to suit his needs. If he's confronted, his first tactic will be to play the, "Oh, you misunderstand...here's what that video REALLY shows," card. If he can see that won't work with someone, he'll simply slink away and use the same failed arguments with other people. The more people he convinces, the more he becomes convinced that he's right by merit of them reflecting his projected reality back at him. In the face of OVERWHELMING rejection though, he'll really have no choice but to just retreat and do whatever damage control he can.

We'd better be getting the truth out there, or the other version is going to stick. I do not see us doing that.
 
We'd better be getting the truth out there, or the other version is going to stick. I do not see us doing that.

I think there is so much data people are still wading through it for the best silver bullet. I want it out too, and as soon as possible before Tuesday's primary in Illinois, but if we can get a better product out within the day, I'd rather that than a poor response. I have sent Brent's write up a few places and it wasn't posted. If he interviewed them it would be better. At one point last night he said he was interviewing with some local news agency, I am hoping that turns up and is decent so we can spread it around.
 
Guys like this don't care. He thinks he can convince people of his version of events solely by refusing to acknowledge reality. It doesn't matter how much video evidence we have; history does not exist as something concrete and immutable for him. History is liquid and changes to suit his needs, and part of him probably believes it in the moment. If he's confronted, his first tactic will be to play the, "Oh, you misunderstand...here's what that video REALLY shows," card. If he can see that won't work with someone, he'll simply slink away and use the same failed arguments with other people. He'll surround himself with sycophants and others who trust him absolutely, and the more friends and associates he manages to convince of his story (you've known me for years; would I lie to you?), the more he will become utterly convinced that he's justified by merit of them reflecting his projected reality back at him...and the more he will become angry and hateful toward the people who refuse to accept his reality. In the face of OVERWHELMING rejection though, he'll really have no choice but to just retreat and do whatever damage control he can.

This is why it's often a better strategy to pretend no video/audio record exists, until these guys go on the record with their version of events. Then, when the video is released they can be outed as liars, instead of being given an opportunity to spin the record.
 
We'd better be getting the truth out there, or the other version is going to stick. I do not see us doing that.

I'm not sure. ABC has shown a willingness to report some of the facts here, and the cat may be out of the bag. With Dokes and his cronies apparently opposed by an overwhelming number of people at that caucus, there are far too many primary sources for the MSM to ignore (or at least contradict) in the face of a few other journalists willing to report the truth.

This is why it's often a better strategy to pretend no video/audio record exists, until these guys go on the record with their version of events. Then, when the video is released they can be outed as liars, instead of being given an opportunity to spin the record.

I agree. :) I'm pretty optimistic in this case...but that said, you'd be surprised at how many people are willing to believe the word of someone they WANT to believe over factual evidence, even video recordings.
 
Last edited:
I think there is so much data people are still wading through it for the best silver bullet. I want it out too, and as soon as possible before Tuesday's primary in Illinois, but if we can get a better product out within the day, I'd rather that than a poor response.

Whatever became of Huntsman's false-flag video?
 
This is why it's often a better strategy to pretend no video/audio record exists, until these guys go on the record with their version of events. Then, when the video is released they can be outed as liars, instead of being given an opportunity to spin the record.

Agreed. I was hoping for our version to be kept on the down low until the campaign had a chance to reveal it.
 
I agree. :) I'm pretty optimistic in this case...but that said, you'd be surprised at how many people are willing to believe the word of someone they WANT to believe over factual evidence, even video recordings.

Unfortunately, nothing surprises me, anymore. I've grown incapable of anything beyond disappointment.
 
Eugene Dokes is a lunatic and a liar.

Tyrants are always like this. "I am SOO, SOO SCARED of these ANGRY people. They might become violent and hurt me, BOO HOO! Give me pity and sympathy! I am always either a hero or a victim, and sometimes both at once! (Nevermind whatever I did to make people so furious.)"
 
Could this be an inside job?. I remember when the Police want to cause riot, they would place agitators in the crowd to incite rioting. Another thing i noticed was, where was the chairman?, in such an event, what is with this Temp Chairman?!.

Ron Paul supporter's don't cause riots or upset unless they have good reason to, or anyone for that matter.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top