Enoch & the Watchers: The Real Story of Angels & Demons

[Ronin Truth]

What did you mean by this?

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I have another?

 

[Ronin Truth]

That was a direct response to your post, and another attempt and discussing the thread topic with you, which, as usual, you keep refusing to do.

What is it about 1 Enoch that you think screws with the Paulinist agenda?

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I have another?

 

[Sola_Fide]

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I have another?

What is your problem, idiot?

 

[erowe1]

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I have another?

Sure. But it wasn't off topic. Let's discuss the OP.

 

[RJB]

Is that Ronin?

If the shoe fits, as he's said. It's more accurate a description of him than he portrays Christians.

 

[Ronin Truth]

What is your problem, idiot?

What does that mean?

 

[Ronin Truth]

If the shoe fits, as he's said. It's more accurate a description of him than he portrays Christians.

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I have another?

 

[Ronin Truth]

Sure. But it wasn't off topic. Let's discuss the OP.

What does that mean?

 

[RJB]

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I have another?

Have you seen aliens playing hide and seek under your sofa today?

 

[Ronin Truth]

Have you seen aliens playing hide and seek under your sofa today?

What does that mean?

 

[erowe1]

What does that mean?

It means that the post you called off-topic was actually on topic. I'm trying to discuss the OP with you. In the OP you said that 1 Enoch screws with the official "Christian"(so called) [Paulinist] agenda.

How do you think it does that?

 

[Sola_Fide]

What does that mean?

It means that you are acting like an idiot, and I was wondering what your problem was. You made an assertion in the OP and I asked you to expand on what you meant by your assertion.

(See how easy it is to answer the question "what does that mean"?)

 

[Ronin Truth]

It means that you are acting like an idiot, and I was wondering what your problem was. You made an assertion in the OP and I asked you to expand on what you meant by your assertion.

(See how easy it is to answer the question "what does that mean"?)

What does that mean?

 

[Dr.3D]

Seems like he can't tell why he thinks 1 Enoch screws with the official "Christian"(so called) [Paulinist] agenda.

 

[Sola_Fide]

What does that mean?

How can a man as old as you are be as immature as you are on a public forum? Is pretty shameful.

 

[Ronin Truth]

Seems like he can't tell why he thinks 1 Enoch screws with the official "Christian"(so called) [Paulinist] agenda.

Keep seeming. Won't doesn't mean can't. And they're spelled differently.

 

[Ronin Truth]

How can a man as old as you are be as immature as you are on a public forum? Is pretty shameful.

Is that code?

 

[Ronin Truth]

How can a man as old as you are be as immature as you are on a public forum? Is pretty shameful.

What?

 

[Ronin Truth]

It means that the post you called off-topic was actually on topic. I'm trying to discuss the OP with you. In the OP you said that 1 Enoch screws with the official "Christian"(so called) [Paulinist] agenda.

How do you think it does that?

Does what?

 

[erowe1]

Does what?

How does 1 Enoch screw with the official "Christian"(so called) [Paulinist] agenda?