Elizabeth Warren leading in polls... SERIOUSLY?

[Anti Federalist]

Yeah, but you're expected to win your home state. Georgia isn't liberal by any stretch of the imagination, but Jimmy Carter still carried it in 1980. It was a major loss of face for Al Gore to lose Tennessee in 2000.

That said, what is Romney's "home state"?

Michigan? He's probably going to lose there.

California? He's definitely going to lose there.

Massachusetts? He definitely going to lose there as well.

New Hampshire? He's likely to lose there.

Utah is about the only "home state" of his that he is likely to win.

 

[Keith and stuff]

That said, what is Romney's "home state"?

Michigan? He's probably going to lose there.

California? He's definitely going to lose there.

Massachusetts? He definitely going to lose there as well.

New Hampshire? He's likely to lose there.

Utah is about the only "home state" of his that he is likely to win.

I thought his home state was Mexico. Isn't that where his family is from? I thought his dad was a Mexican.

 

[Agorism]

Elizabeth Warren is probably the most irritating democrat out there, but idk if I could vote for Scott Brown either.

 

[Keith and stuff]

Elizabeth Warren is probably the most irritating democrat out there, but idk if I could vote for Scott Brown either.

If I lived in MA, I'd vote for Scott Brown. There is no pro-liberty candidate in the race and I tend to vote, and to vote for the least bad candidate in the race (as long as their are at least 2 candidates). If the GOP gets a majority in the US Senate, it will mean a great deal for Rand Paul's agenda. He will be able to have a lot more votes, amendments and so on. Plus, I'm worried that Reid may never allow a vote on a full audit of the FED.

 

[matt0611]

If I lived in MA, I'd vote for Scott Brown. There is no pro-liberty candidate in the race and I tend to vote, and to vote for the least bad candidate in the race (as long as their are at least 2 candidates). If the GOP gets a majority in the US Senate, it will mean a great deal for Rand Paul's agenda. He will be able to have a lot more votes, amendments and so on. Plus, I'm worried that Reid may never allow a vote on a full audit of the FED.

Yep. I'm voting for Brown, he may be a RINO but he's better than having another Harvard Professor Obama-clone in the Senate for life.

 

[juleswin]

You can't be republican senator from MA without being a RINO. Do you really blame him? He's being attacked for being TOO CONSERVATIVE.

If you stray anymore than a few feet to the right of Joseph Stalin our idiot electorate here in Massachusetts will just replace you with someone more liberal.

One can drop the religious right/social conservative thing (which he already dropped) and still win as a true fiscal conservative in Massachusetts. And while he is at it, he can be non interventionist and still do just fine. But instead he choose to be a warmonger(supported Libyan war + all the other wars we r fighting) and a welfare state guy, sorry but I have seen this movie before so am going to pass

 

[matt0611]

Double Post.

 

[matt0611]

One can drop the religious right/social conservative thing (which he already dropped) and still win as a true fiscal conservative in Massachusetts. And while he is at it, he can be non interventionist and still do just fine. But instead he choose to be a warmonger(supported Libyan war + all the other wars we r fighting) and a welfare state guy, sorry but I have seen this movie before so am going to pass

Yeah, well when there is a guy running for Senate that has those views I'll vote for him (which I did, since I voted for Joe Kennedy(no relation) in 2010), until then I'll vote for the RINO over the Obama clone.