I got 84/100 Austrian. My economic knowledge is limited, but from listening to Ron Paul and studying free markets, I learned a little. I actually got a Keyensian answer because I didn't understand the taxes question. I diagree with the Austrian answer on defense. I gave the Chicago answer
National defense is neutral to the market. On the one hand, it
cost taxpayers money, but, on the other, it provides a stable
environment
that permits peace to flourish and rights to be protected. By its very
nature, government should maintain a monopoly over the use of force,
and defending the nation against external and internal foes flows from
this primary obligation. Before we can even talk about economic
production, government-provided security and defense must be firmly in
place.
Otherwise, we are back to the Hobbesian jungle. Chicago answer