Eating liver

samforpaul

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
674
Today I heard a doctor recommend eating an animal's liver. However I've also heard it said not to eat the liver because it's a filter.
Please share any wisdom you have on this. Thanks.
 
If you have certain mineral deficiencies, it can be good. Iron deficiency in particular.

If you have no deficiencies, the nutritional value of liver is not worth the toxins.
 
One take: http://chriskresser.com/natures-most-potent-superfood

The chart below lists the micronutrient content of apples, carrots, red meat and beef liver. Note that every nutrient in red meat except for vitamin C surpasses those in apples and carrots, and every nutrient—including vitamin C—in beef liver occurs in exceedingly higher levels in beef liver compared to apple and carrots. In general, organ meats are between 10 and 100 times higher in nutrients than corresponding muscle meats.

In fact, you might be surprised to learn that in some traditional cultures, only the organ meats were consumed. The lean muscle meats, which are what we mostly eat in the U.S. today, were discarded or perhaps given to the dogs.

A popular objection to eating liver is the belief that the liver is a storage organ for toxins in the body. While it is true that one of the liver’s role is to neutralize toxins (such as drugs, chemical agents and poisons), it does not store these toxins. Toxins the body cannot eliminate are likely to accumulate in the body’s fatty tissues and nervous systems. On the other hand, the liver is a is a storage organ for many important nutrients (vitamins A, D, E, K, B12 and folic acid, and minerals such as copper and iron). These nutrients provide the body with some of the tools it needs to get rid of toxins.
(chart at link)
 
Calf's liver is the best to eat if you are deficient in vitamins and minerals. It's also a great source of protein. Good organic calf liver is the best way to go. The older animal's liver have accumulated toxins in it and is not so healthy to eat.
 
It is quite tasty (to me anyways). You do need to trim out the veins in it before cooking- they can be tough. Add some browned onions.
 
Yuck. I'll get my iron from eating me spinach.

No you won't. From wikipedia:

Spinach, along with other green leafy vegetables, is considered to be rich in iron. For example, the United States Department of Agriculture states that a 180-g serving of boiled spinach contains 6.43 mg of iron, whereas a 170-g ground hamburger patty contains at most 4.42 mg. However, spinach contains iron absorption-inhibiting substances, including high levels of oxalate, which can bind to the iron to form ferrous oxalate and render much of the iron in spinach unusable by the body. In addition to preventing absorption and use, high levels of oxalates remove iron from the body.

Spinach also has a high calcium content. However, the oxalate content in spinach also binds with calcium, decreasing its absorption. Calcium and zinc also limit iron absorption. The calcium in spinach is the least bioavailable of calcium sources. By way of comparison, the body can absorb about half of the calcium present in broccoli, yet only around 5% of the calcium in spinach.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinach#Nutrition
 
One take: http://chriskresser.com/natures-most-potent-superfood

The chart below lists the micronutrient content of apples, carrots, red meat and beef liver.
(chart at link)

That chart doesn't seem to line up with other nutrition reporting sites. For example, in the chart in the link you posted, it lists 100g of carrots as having "None" vitamin A. But link below says 100g of carrots has 16,705 IU of vitamin A (334% RDA). The above link also says 100g carrots have 3.3 mg of calcium while the link below says 33 mg. There are numerous other discrepancies.

http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/vegetables-and-vegetable-products/2383/2
 
That chart doesn't seem to line up with other nutrition reporting sites. For example, in the chart in the link you posted, it lists 100g of carrots as having "None" vitamin A. But link below says 100g of carrots has 16,705 IU of vitamin A (334% RDA). The above link also says 100g carrots have 3.3 mg of calcium while the link below says 33 mg. There are numerous other discrepancies.

http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/vegetables-and-vegetable-products/2383/2

Thanks for double checking that. I honestly didn't even look at the chart- it listed a lot of things- I mentioned that it was availabe at the link since it was mentioned in the text I copied. I did see other sources which verified their claim that liver does not store the toxins it separates out which is the reason I did cite it in the first place.
 
Last edited:
Calf liver, salted, peppered , cooked with onions is very good , itis one of those special dishes that you will like or dislike , no in between, As a child we would butcher a couple calfs , some hogs ( sell the rest except seed ) and smoke ,freeze and eat it to next yr , including liver, heart , tongue, but you are not eating it often .....
 
i eat liver every week, if it's grassfed you shouldnt have to worry about toxins, it is probably the most nutrient dense food out there.
 
Back
Top