liberty_Forever
Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2007
- Messages
- 1,300
What the hell is going on here
Easily Verifiable Shenanigans In Greenville
- Thread starter limequat
- Start date
malkusm
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 5,791
It would be helpful for anyone on the ground to confirm that these results on the Nashua Telegraph website were in print in this morning's paper. For the most part, the reporting seems very accurate except for the few (mostly minor) discrepancies I pointed out. But I am interested in why the votes, when transferred from a local source to a national one, are always lost (always less votes in the AP reporting).
liberty_Forever
Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2007
- Messages
- 1,300
Please contact the Nashua Telegraph and leave votes regarding Greenville. Romney should have won this area but according to the AP McCain is the "projected" winner. Also, according to AP , Paul got "zero" votes in Greenville when according to the Nashua Telegraph he got 25. There is so much fraud here we are going to need to compile a report.
tsopranos
Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 444
From blackboxvoting...
1-7-08: Silvestro the Cat & New Hampshire Elections
UPDATE JAN 9 9am PST: TOWN OF SUTTON CONFIRMS RON PAUL TOTALS WERE 31, NOT ZERO.
I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton. She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31, and said that they were "left off the tally sheet" and it was human error.
This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent. They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media sheet with the incorrect results.
UPDATE JAN 9 9am PST: TOWN OF SUTTON CONFIRMS RON PAUL TOTALS WERE 31, NOT ZERO.
I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton. She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31, and said that they were "left off the tally sheet" and it was human error.
This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent. They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media sheet with the incorrect results.
