Drudge this pic! (Ron Paul's support 2008 vs 2012)

[Kregisen]

Honest question: Have you read "End The Fed" by Ron Paul?

I haven't finished it yet, why?

I don't think anyone expected to double or triple Nevada's 2008 numbers. Just the fact that there has been substantial gain in every state that some how Nevada is some sort of freak state.

If I wasn't mistaken either but didn't PPP have Ron Paul polling at 9% right before the Nevada caucus? They're real accurate aren't they.

They polled us at 15% and we got 19%. We also got 15% in 2008, so we got about a 27% higher showing than 4 years ago.

 

[wongster41]

I rejected any 'voter fraud' claims

Even if the claim is from Ron Paul himself for the 2008 campaign????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh4DmZY5YYk - skip to 6:00 to hear RP talking about Vote Fraud

 

[Suzu]

It came from Jack Hunter's article titled: THE IMPORTANCE OF VOTING

http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2012/02/06/ron-pauls-performance-to-date-the-importance-of-voting/

I have no earthly idea why you would think drudging this would be a good idea.

I sent the pic to Jack Hunter. At the time I made the OP, his article didn't exist.

And forgive me, I have no earthly idea why you would think not sharing this would be a good idea. It ought to be plain as the nose on your face that for RP's numbers not to have increased in NV of all places is simply impossible and clear empirical evidence of massive election fraud.

 

[Kregisen]

RonPaulForums, I sincerely apologize for making all of your members appear dumb. I was mistaken in my previous comments, by thinking this was a GD FORUM. I'm glad Kregisan pointed out how utterly stupid of me that was.

I never said anything about you but if you publicly said on here that someone changed the vote totals from most or all of the 1,800 precincts, then good luck in life.

 

[LibertyEagle]

I sent the pic to Jack Hunter. At the time I made the OP, his article didn't exist.

And forgive me, I have no earthly idea why you would think not sharing this would be a good idea. It ought to be plain as the nose on your face that for RP's numbers not to have increased in NV of all places is simply impossible and clear empirical evidence of massive election fraud.

It is evidence that a whole lot of our people did not show up.

 

[tfurrh]

I never said anything about you but if you publicly said on here that someone changed the vote totals from most or all of the 1,800 precincts, then good luck in life.

Yes that's exactly what I said...you can find it 32 posts back:

someone changed the vote totals from most or all of the 1,800 precincts!

I'm going to start braiding my noose now, because life from here out will be impaired by my stupidity.

 

[Suzu]

This is how the image I put in the OP looked before I made the change to the figures in the right-most column. Compare that part of the image to the one in the OP. I added space between the two figures - which are crammed together in this version of the pic.

 

[specsaregood]

It is evidence that a whole lot of our people did not show up.

For other candidates as well. Romney got over 6000 less votes this time, but about the same percentage.
Turn out was down about 1/3, yet Paul still turned out the same # of people. this should be spun into a positive, not a negative.

 

[Liberty4life]

Told you guys diebold was stealing elections, the repubs dont care about winning potus

 

[RonPaulGangsta]

People are delusional idiots if they don't think Ron has been cheated in every state, especially Nevada and Iowa.

 

[unknown]

WOW. Super WOW.

 

[nayjevin]

Is it because precincts were dropped?

All candidates might have low numbers in NV if entire precincts were dropped because of discrepancies.

 

[Publicani]

According to the data, the ratio for four states is: 2.20, 3.11, 4.85, 1.87 and in Nevada 1.01. So Nevada's ratio is 1.49 standard deviations (=1.34) from the mean (=3.01) of the four states. I think the difference is huge, but statistically it is not significant.

 

[pacelli]

I sent the pic to Jack Hunter. At the time I made the OP, his article didn't exist.

And forgive me, I have no earthly idea why you would think not sharing this would be a good idea. It ought to be plain as the nose on your face that for RP's numbers not to have increased in NV of all places is simply impossible and clear empirical evidence of massive election fraud.

Too bad Hunter's article doesn't involved addressing the issue of massive election fraud and instead focuses solely on VOTING.

Congratulations-- it will probably show up on drudge.

 

[Suzu]

Told you guys diebold was stealing elections, the repubs dont care about winning potus

Just for the record: Diebold no longer exists, it's now Elections Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S) But this is a moot point anyway in this case because no machines were used in Nevada.

I'm not sure on your third statement. I think they do care, but maybe they're either too dumb or too obstinate to realize that RP is their only real chance this time.

 

[Mark37snj]

// Already posted.

 

[Liberty1789]

You have a much, much better chart to publish, guys: break down Nevada in 3 regions. Instead of +1% in votes, according to CNN poll, you get:

Clark region +26%
Rural region +22%
Washoe region-29%

That chart is massively more telling!

And now you pause and think: what happened?

Let Hunter know

 

[Mark37snj]

You have a much, much better chart to publish, guys: break down Nevada in 3 regions. Instead of +1% in votes, according to CNN poll, you get:

Clark region +26%
Rural region +22%
Washoe region-29%

That chart is massively more telling!

And now you pause and think: what happened?

Let Hunter know

WOW, I mean just WOW.

A few posters last nite were saying that Clark was the distraction and the real funny business was going on in Washoe.

Since this was a caucus and they have the actual ballots still, can we sue to get a look at them?

 

[Publicani]

Can somebody give me the link to the total number of Republican voters in each of the five states in 2008 and 2012?

 

[specsaregood]

Can somebody give me the link to the total number of Republican voters in each of the five states in 2008 and 2012?

here:

2012 NV Caucus Results (UPDATED TO REFLECT OFFICIAL COUNT, ONLY MINOR CHANGES)
http://www.nevadagop.org/nvgop-caucus-results-certified/ (as of 3am CT Feb 6 -DON'T BLAME ME IF IT CHANGES!)
Romney === 16,486 (50.01%)
Gingrich == 6,956 (21.10%)
Paul ====== 6,175 (18.73%)
Santorum == 3,277 ( 9.94%)
No Vote === == 69 ( 0.21%)
Total turnout: 32,963
Implied delgates: Romney = 14, Gingrich = 6, Paul = 5, Santorum = 3.

Romney down 6160 votes from 2008, Paul up 91 votes since 2008.

Compare to 2008 results:
Romney === 22,646 (51.10%)
Paul ====== 6,084 (13.73%)
McCain ==== 5,650 (12.75%)
Huckabee == 3,616 ( 8.16%)
Thompson == 3,519 ( 7.94%)
Giuliani == 1,910 ( 4.31%)
Hunter ====== 890 ( 2.01%)