Drudge: Politico--RON PAUL SUPPORTERS QUESTION OUTCOME

To be expected. Shouting "liar" and other immature nonsense.

Of course, if Paul had won it would have been fine.
 
Here come all the stooges to say that cancelling a caucus
Where Paul was going to do well was not rigging.

What a joke
 
Well when they publicly say they are trying to stop Ron from winning, it's hard to believe the election is fair. I don't trust establishment Republican officials, never will..and I'll never vote for any of them. They are crooks. They are liars. They are fraudsters. They have bags full of dirty tricks. They will never garner my trust, or my vote.

If you don't think there was any fraud or dirty tricks going on, you've got your head in the sand. There are plenty of examples and the campaign itself by Doug Wead has said there are been numerous examples. They just can't come out with it charging widespread fraud or the media will run with the conspiracy theorist, angry old man in denial theme.
 
Well when they publicly say they are trying to stop Ron from winning, it's hard to believe the election is fair. I don't trust establishment Republican officials, never will..and I'll never vote for any of them. They are crooks. They are liars. They are fraudsters. They have bags full of dirty tricks. They will never garner my trust, or my vote.

If you don't think there was any fraud or dirty tricks going on, you've got your head in the sand. There are plenty of examples and the campaign itself by Doug Wead has said there are been numerous examples. They just can't come out with it charging widespread fraud or the media will run with the conspiracy theorist, angry old man in denial theme.

Proof or not I will NEVER EVER EVER believe the Iowa results.
 
I'm sorry, but I'm the first to call people out when they claim fraud without proof, but the situation here is rife with shadiness. But the fact is, they did stack the deck against Paul to prevent him from getting the announcement tonight by adding caucuses that favor Romney and delaying one that Paul is favored to win by a large margin (not to mention throwing out results in several contests). He will win the caucuses, but he has lost the beauty pageant the media cares so much about it.
 
So they rig difference in the final votes to surpass the total vote from Washington county. Yeah, that can be rigged easily.
 
the only way to fight this is to come in with the pictures of the missiles in Cuba scenario ... ie absolute proof and then prepared to wait till hell freezes over ... hiring a top private investigator could be a way to get that kind of undeniable evidence ... or you risk the slanted and agenda driven media to attack you ... you have to come in with indisputable concrete evidence
 
I agree on Nevada but it started in Iowa. Right from the get go I knew something was up and Nevada just confirmed it and by the time Maine came around it was "it figures".....
 
I agree on Nevada but it started in Iowa. Right from the get go I knew something was up and Nevada just confirmed it and by the time Maine came around it was "it figures".....

Yep. I wonder how many people around here are still pretending the elections aren't rigged.
 
I believe the elections are somewhat rigged, but not to the extent that some people on here claim they are. 1000 votes? Yes. 10,000 votes to win NV? No.

Because of how close Maine was and what went on, it absolutely is a real possibility that something went down. The fact that Romney went back to campaign in the first place...he may have been tipped off that he was barely losing.
 
They have no logical argument, to deny the February 18th Caucus results, if they're the cause as to why it's postponed.

If it were the National Election, and 3 cities experience power grid failures an hour prior to the votes being allowed, would they also postpone and deprive those votes?
 
Back
Top