Driver Trapped in Tesla After It Bursts into Flames, Electronic Doors Fail

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,537
Driver Trapped in Tesla After It Bursts into Flames, Electronic Doors Fail

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2021...-it-bursts-into-flames-electronic-doors-fail/

Lucas Nolan3 Jul 2021

A Tesla Model S Plaid reportedly erupted into flames outside of Philadelphia, trapping the owner inside after electronically activated doors refused to open, the car owner’s attorneys claim. The driver escaped from the Tesla, but the fire took more than two hours for the fire department to extinguish.

The Washington Post reports that a Tesla Model S Plaid erupted into flames as the owner was driving down the road, the owner’s attorneys claim that the man was briefly trapped inside the burning vehicle after the car’s electronically activated doors refused to open.

The incident took place outside Philadelphia just days after the man received the vehicle that Tesla has hailed as the world’s quickest production car. Tesla said that it delivered the first 25 vehicles in June after CEO Elon Musk held a glamorous media event in Fremont, California.

Authorities from the Gladwyne Fire Department initially stated that they were investigating a fire involving a Tesla Model S but by Thursday, the news released had been taken down. The chief fire officer of the Lower Merion Township Fire Department, Charles McGarvey, confirmed to the Post that there was a fire Tuesday involving a Tesla Model S Plaid and it took over two hours to extinguish.

“With the Teslas, you’ve got to just put copious amounts of water on it,” he said. “After that, you’ve got to sit 45 minutes, an hour, [and] once it stops smoking you can release it to second responders. We had it towed to a location that was secured.”

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) stated that it is beginning to gather information on the incident. NHTSA spokesperson Lucia Sanchez stated: “NHTSA is aware of the Tesla vehicle fire in Gladwyne, Pennsylvania; and the agency is in touch with relevant agencies and the manufacturer to gather information about the incident. If data or investigations show a defect or an inherent risk to safety exists, NHTSA will take action as appropriate to protect the public.”

Mark Geragos, of the law firm Geragos and Geragos, is representing the owner and has called for Tesla to take the vehicles off the road. “This is a harrowing and frightening situation and an obvious major problem,” Geragos said in a statement. “Our preliminary investigation is ongoing, but we call on Tesla to sideline these cars until a full investigation can occur.”

This is far from the first Tesla that has caught fire, Breitbart News reported in April that two men died near Houston after a Tesla vehicle which was believed to be operating without anyone in the driver’s seat crashed into a tree. Sgt. Cinthya Umanzor of the Harris County Constable Precinct 4 said: “There was no one in the driver’s seat.”

The 2019 Tesla Model S vehicle was traveling a high rate of speed when it failed to correctly navigate a curve and left the roadway, crashing into a tree and exploding into flames, according to local television station KHOU-TV.

The fire was extinguished and authorities located two occupants in the vehicle. One was in the first passenger seat while the other was in the back seat of the Tesla, the report stated citing Harris County Precinct 4 Constable Mark Herman.

In December of 2020, a Tesla Model S owner named Usmaan Ahmad heard metallic bangs coming from his vehicle as he pulled off a suburban Dallas thoroughfare last month. Ahmad pulled over and moments later his five-year-old vehicle began shooting flames.

Ahmad, 41, stated that the sound he heard was like “if you were to drop an axle of a normal car,” but the vehicle was fully intact. As Ahmad stood on the side of the road watching his vehicle, the car burst into flames concentrated around the front passenger-side wheel. “This was shooting out like a flamethrower,” said Ahmad. Experts believe that the issue is related to the battery which raises questions about the safety and durability of electric vehicles as they age.
 
Corvair, Pinto, Samurai, Cherokee, Explorer, C-10, Corolla, Camry, A-5...these are just a few models I can recall off the top of my head that were subjected to intense media and government scrutiny, sometimes totally unjustified, over safety issues.

Teslas...crickets.
 
Audi 5000.

That was the last time I saw 60 Minutes. The engine overpowered the brakes? Stop insulting my intelligence.

These incendiary land torpedoes? Nothing, contrived, hysterical or even factual. Buy a Tesla! It won't put off too much carbon dioxide when it burns to a crisp with you in it!
 
Audi 5000.

That was the last time I saw 60 Minutes. The engine overpowered the brakes? Stop insulting my intelligence.

These incendiary land torpedoes? Nothing, contrived, hysterical or even factual. Buy a Tesla!

Yup, that's what I was thinking of when I jotted down "A5".

And how about the millions of cars still rolling around with defective, fully armed, land mines under the dash, iow, defective Tanakta airbags, that Uncle Sucker will NOT allow you disconnect?

It won't put off too much carbon dioxide when it burns to a crisp with you in it!

If only that was all it was...CO2.

iu
 
Isn't this just a perfect example of this generation?

Based solely on the hype and the ability to feel superior, people buy things (in this case, cars) with other people's money and then they are surprised when those things end up trapping them in a slow fiery death.
 
Isn't this just a perfect example of this generation?

Based solely on the hype and the ability to feel superior, people buy things (in this case, cars) with other people's money and then they are surprised when those things end up trapping them in a slow fiery death.

Electric cars are improving rapidly and in perhaps a decade it will be better than ICE as a general purpose vehicle.

Even currently, electric makes sense for some people in some locations for some purposes.

Yes, this is largely because of current government subsidies, but even without market interference, electric would still win eventually.
 
Electric cars are improving rapidly and in perhaps a decade it will be better than ICE as a general purpose vehicle.

Even currently, electric makes sense for some people in some locations for some purposes.

Yes, this is largely because of current government subsidies, but even without market interference, electric would still win eventually.

Oh, don't get me wrong... I'm all for electrification of transportation. Done right, it can be a far more efficient way of moving people and things.

But I'm talking about the current business model - based on getting government dollars to make wealthier people "feel" good about themselves.

You can apply it to cars, health care, education, pretty much every place government gets involved, you end up trapped in a slow fiery death.
 
*Electric vehicle fire, you essentially have two options;

1) Let it burn out.

2) Keep stored underwater [potentially disassemble].

I think option two relates to the 'secure location'.


*More of a large capacity lithium battery fire...
 
Corvair, Pinto, Samurai, Cherokee, Explorer, C-10, Corolla, Camry, A-5...these are just a few models I can recall off the top of my head that were subjected to intense media and government scrutiny, sometimes totally unjustified, over safety issues.

Teslas...crickets.

I hear lots of anti-tesla..
Very little about Toyota or Polestar electric cars. (also on the roads)

Tesla did push the issue,, but are hardly the only player .. just the Visible success at this point.
 
I hear lots of anti-tesla..
Very little about Toyota or Polestar electric cars. (also on the roads)

Tesla did push the issue,, but are hardly the only player .. just the Visible success at this point.

Pete, I know you like the electrics, and that's fine.

I have no problem admitting they are stupid fast, and mechanically are much more simple and thus, should be, more reliable.

My problem is that the inherent issues of range and "grid free" use, those technological shortfalls, make them much more susceptible to tracking, tracing and remote shutdowns.

We know the system wants us immobile in urban stack a prole units and that cheap, reliable, "Model T" type transportation is a thorn in the side of those plans.

That's why the media is silent as the grave on these Tesla incidents, and if the Volts, Leafs, Polestars, Fords or Toyotas prove to have as many serious issues as the Teslas do, they'll look the other way as well.
 
Pete, I know you like the electrics, and that's fine.

I have no problem admitting they are stupid fast, and mechanically are much more simple and thus, should be, more reliable.

My problem is that the inherent issues of range and "grid free" use, those technological shortfalls, make them much more susceptible to tracking, tracing and remote shutdowns.

We know the system wants us immobile in urban stack a prole units and that cheap, reliable, "Model T" type transportation is a thorn in the side of those plans.

That's why the media is silent as the grave on these Tesla incidents, and if the Volts, Leafs, Polestars, Fords or Toyotas prove to have as many serious issues as the Teslas do, they'll look the other way as well.

Why would you ever want to leave your pre-approved boundary of freedom?

You'll need a permit for that.
 
Pete, I know you like the electrics, and that's fine.

I have no problem admitting they are stupid fast, and mechanically are much more simple and thus, should be, more reliable.

My problem is that the inherent issues of range and "grid free" use, those technological shortfalls, make them much more susceptible to tracking, tracing and remote shutdowns.

We know the system wants us immobile in urban stack a prole units and that cheap, reliable, "Model T" type transportation is a thorn in the side of those plans.

That's why the media is silent as the grave on these Tesla incidents, and if the Volts, Leafs, Polestars, Fords or Toyotas prove to have as many serious issues as the Teslas do, they'll look the other way as well.

I read such a study,,and will try to find it..

gist was,, electrics are about half as likely to burn in a fatal accident than an ICE car. perhaps 1/3..

Will try to find it again.
 
Last edited:
Because no one ever gets trapped in ICE cars,, because they can't open doors. Right?

https://www.firerescue1.com/fire-pr...-you-from-the-jaws-of-death-cZf0FflBNVLiTVuS/

Apples and Bowling Balls.

Huge difference in my mind between doors that won't open because they have been smashed into a pie plate because of a collision, and doors that will not open because they are strictly "fly by wire" and have no mechanical emergency backup when the everfucking computers fail or catch fire.
 
Ah yes, remember that one too. The media hasn't changed, they are just more blatant and brazen with their lies these days.

They were actually forced to "apologize" albeit with a smirk and grin.

Now, they tell you to go fuck yourself when caught in their monumental lies and bullshit.
 
I read such a study,,and will try to find it..

gist was,, electrics are about half as likely to burn in a fatal accident than an ICE car. perhaps 1/3..

Will try to find it again.

Would like to see that too.

In a fatal accident?

Yes, I could see that, as I would assume a fatal accident would entail severe damage to the entire vehicle, including the fuel system, which could lead to a fire.

Problem is, a lot of these Teslas are burning up for no good reason.

There have been cases of them just sitting, parked, not charging or doing anything, and shorting out and burning down.
 
Back
Top