Dr. Paul: Scrap the Monstrous Health Care Bill

[IPSecure]

"I think it's monstrous," Paul said. "I don't think it will improve medical care in this country. I think it's very, very costly and we don't have any money. And they don't have any way of paying for it."

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2009/07/obamas_health_care_plan_will_b.html

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=22417

 

[Oceania]

This bill better not go through.....ugh

 

[drgreg]

Inaction is not an option. If the average citizen does absolutely nothing, what is to prevent the government from becoming a pimp between you and whatever doctors will not go on strike, but choose instead to prostitute themselves to take care of your "unhappy ending" in the future.

What can you do --right now--to make the case for freedom in healthcare?

Go to http://www.doctorsonstrike.com/intellectualammunition.html and find out several quick and easy things you can do to make a difference.

When will you do it? Where are you going to do it? Have an "implementation intention"-- a plan of when and where you are going to fight for liberty and individual rights in healthcare.

This is a war--one we must win. We supply intellectual and political ammunition needed to win this war. Pick up some ammo, spread it around among family and friends, and fire off some messages to the Congress and the media.

Dr. Gregory L. Garamoni
Founder & Executive Director, Doctors on Strike for Freedom in Medicine
www.doctorsonstrike.com

 

[MelissaCato]

Gregory L. Garamoni, Ph.D.

Regarding your Declaration of Independence, you used the word inalienable.

It should be unalienable ... huge difference. Just saying.

Great job with your site BTW. I forwarded.

 

[drgreg]

You are the first one to bring this to my attention! Just checked the D of I online. You are right. I'll fix that, pronto. Looked in the dictionary:

inalienable |inˈālēənəbəl|
adjective
unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor : freedom of religion, the most inalienable of all human rights.

unalienable |ˌənˈālyənəbəl; -ˈālēə-|
adjective another term for inalienable.

Seems synonymous.. What say you?

Greg

 

[Scofield]

Gregory L. Garamoni, Ph.D.

Regarding your Declaration of Independence, you used the word inalienable.

It should be unalienable ... huge difference. Just saying.

Great job with your site BTW. I forwarded.

Um, no?

It's inalienable.

 

[PaulaGem]

Um, no?

It's inalienable.

It's just a linguistic change. When the Declaration was written "unalienable" was the common term and that is what they use. It has since change to "inailienable". There have been a lot of changes like this since the 18th century. They both mean the same thing.

When I researched the supposed Franklin quote about two wolves and a lamb that uses the term "lunch" I found that the term "lunch" was not used until the 1820's so that could not possibly be a Franklin quote.

When quoting the Declaration directly you might want to use "unalienable". It's also a good way to draw attention to the fact that you've actually read and studied the document.

 

[Pepsi]

bump

 

[TCE]

This is easily the GOP's best talking point. This should become their new mantra "We are for reform, we just want this 1500 page bill broken up into 15 separate bills so we can read them." Or something like that. It's hard to argue against that logic.

 

[ScoutsHonor]

This is easily the GOP's best talking point. This should become their new mantra "We are for reform, we just want this 1500 page bill broken up into 15 separate bills so we can read them." Or something like that. It's hard to argue against that logic.

The 1500 pages is the blanket by which they intend to cover the shameless sin of the signatories. There's method to their madness; if there weren't the damn thing wouldn't BE 1500 pages, and each Congressman would INSIST on reading it all and noone could stop him.

But instead, it's all just smoke and mirrors, see? ..

 

[Bruno]

The 1500 pages is the blanket by which they intend to cover the shameless sin of the signatories. There's method to their madness; if there weren't the damn thing wouldn't BE 1500 pages, and each Congressman would INSIST on reading it all and noone could stop him.

But instead, it's all just smoke and mirrors, see? ..

many already hide behind their ignorance of not reading the TARP and bailout bills, they will surely do the same here.

"How could anyone have read that or understood it? I trusted as you did what we were told. I would have never voted for it if I knew blank was in there."

 

[ScoutsHonor]

Exactly.

 

[tangent4ronpaul]

1,500 pages is being very optomistic. That's just ONE of the senate bills, add senate bill 2 and the the 3 house bills and this thing will really be a WHALE!

-t