Dr. Paul on CNN again tonight at 10PM 5-27-07

[mtbaird5687]

Hes on right now, yay.

 

[CasualApathy]

Whats happening?

 

[mtbaird5687]

and now hes not on anymore haha. quick little interview but he got some good points in.

 

[DrKevorkian]

I think he did pretty well there. I wish he would have had more time though. They gave him less than 5 minutes

 

[mesler]

I'm not sure how folks will receive his mentioning that some Republicans didn't want us getting involved in WWI and WWII.

 

[MsDoodahs]

YAY RON!!!!

I thought it was very good.

Am I alone in this?

 

[cujothekitten]

It was basically just a quick interview about his war stance and he got to give his thoughts about some bush video clips.

 

[MsDoodahs]

I'm SOOO glad he's addressed the "you are an isolationist" bullshit charge.

Non interventionist and isolationist are NOT the same thing.

 

[murph]

What a great contrast between Bush and Dr. Paul. Iraq invited us over there? Give me a break!

 

[peruvianRP]

He did good as always. The intervierr ass said..." you sound like a 1930 isolist"
Paul said. no asshole I dont say that..read my words "non-intervention".

he did good but I wish people ask him other national issues you know.

 

[cujothekitten]

I'm not sure how folks will receive his mentioning that some Republicans didn't want us getting involved in WWI and WWII.

We didn't want to get involved in WWI and WWII until we were attacked by the Japanese. We didn’t enter to help the Jews.

 

[CasualApathy]

Mike Gravel got like 8 min

 

[Razmear]

Many good points, they played a Bush talking point and had Ron reply to it.
One negative towards the end is he gave the impression that he would not have supported entering WW2. I winced a little bit there.

I'm sure someone will have it on YouTube within minutes.

eb

 

[LibertyOrDie]

Is it just me, or did that report sound like he had never even read a book for himself before? He sounded of someone that had no personal thoughts outside of what he was told to think?

 

[cujothekitten]

Many good points, they played a Bush talking point and had Ron reply to it.
One negative towards the end is he gave the impression that he would not have supported entering WW2. I winced a little bit there.

I'm sure someone will have it on YouTube within minutes.

eb

We didn't even want to enter WWII until we were attacked, just like during 9/11.

 

[a_texian]

Darnit! I just saw this and noticed that it was already 9:32pm (Central Time). I only caught about 1min of it, but it appeared to be an interview that was decidedly friendly towards Dr. Paul. From what little I saw, it certainly didn't appear to be an attack piece.

Oh well.....it's back to "hurrying up and waiting" for the YouTube Gurus!



Ed

 

[CasualApathy]

Well, you cant really argue with the fact that it was a good thing that the US entered WW2... If he really said he wouldn't have, thats a major blunder....

 

[llamabread]

I thought he did good, but I'm getting tired of the media coverage being only about his foreign policy. I know its gained him alot of praise and attention, but people need to see his views on other issues, especially the economy. An uninformed listener used to MSM biases and lies just thinks "Ohh, a republican against the war. How nice."

But anyway, short and to the point.

 

[Razmear]

We didn't even want to enter WWII until we were attacked, just like during 9/11.

I agree, most of us here agree, but wait for the spin if "They" latch on to it and make it an anti-Paul talking point, like Maher did with the civil war thing before becoming a convert.

eb

 

[llamabread]

Well, you cant really argue with the fact that it was a good thing that the US entered WW2... If he really said he wouldn't have, thats a major blunder....

He didn't say that. He said that there were Republicans who were against both world wars to iterate his point about Republicans being non-interventionist.