Dr. Paul on Boortz show at 1020 EST [edited by Mod: Canceled by campaign]

[unklejman]

A caller said Ron Paul was running from Neal Boortz by not talking to him, will he do this as president, like he does from the islamic fascists?


Hannity on boortz: Ron Paul always wines he can't get on the media and then refuses to come on here? Thats crazy.

Boortz: Maybe he's listening to his supporters too much

Hannity: RP supporters are a nutty crowd.

 

[emilysdad]

First, all you people claiming to have had enough, please, just leave, especially folks with 20 posts who claim they will never donate another penny.

Leave the campaign alone. They know much more than you do. They have information you don't. Ron Paul has campaigned for 30 years. In 1996 he took on the Bush Family and the entire GOP and still won.

All these people you talk about, the Hannity's, O'Reily, Beck, Boortz, ect. ect., are nothing but liars and ratings' whores. That is there job. Understand if Ron becomes President, most of these clowns will be out of a job. That job is to maintain division among Americans. People act as if viewers and listeners of these clowns is thier only source of information. There is plenty of good press about Dr. Paul and these viewers must be conflicted. Hopefully some of them will open a book someday, maybe learn how to do internet research, you know, become educated. Truth cannot be distorted, like Dr. Paul, truth is real. These media clowns don't like truth because it brings people together.

I am glad Ron cancelled this interview. In fact, I hope Dr. Paul never goes on FOX again. I hope he never agrees to an interview with any of these clowns who have shown to have no class or journalistic integrity.

As previously posted, this should tell you all you need to know: http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/08/02/beck-hannity-meet-the-president/

 

[familydog]

Like it or not people, we need these talk show hosts and their listeners to support Paul. If they don't we won't win the nomination. They are exactly the type of people we have to have voting. Does anyone here honestly think we can win the Republican nomination without Republicans?

 

[Dlynne]

First, all you people claiming to have had enough, please, just leave, especially folks with 20 posts who claim they will never donate another penny.

OK, I'll leave. Just like you asked.

 

[liberteebell]

emilysdad,

Don't let number of posts color your opinion. I have made tremendous sacrifices and have worked very long and hard to try to get Ron Paul elected, as have many others.

I started reading this forum again because I personally witnessed a couple of situations with paid staffers in which their performance was way less than stellar. In fact, I thought the incompetence was stunning. I just wanted to see if I was the only one who thought this way.

A Ron Paul comes along maybe, if you're lucky, once in a lifetime. This is IT. There aren't going to be second chances or other opportunities and another Ron Paul just isn't going to materialize out of thin air. The time is now. We can't afford missteps, incompetence and lack of enthusiasm or desire. I know what you mean about talk radio and I despise it. However, Ron Paul needs to use every resource out there. He doesn't need any more negative press.

Also, the person who posted about winning without republicans; amen to that, we have to have them. Period!

There's a lot of misinformation about Ron Paul out there; he needs to take every opportunity to correct it, even if it means using the media whores to do it. Just the other day, I convinced 2 fred heads to at least read my material on Ron Paul; they had the totally mistaken idea that Paul is a roll-over-and-play-dead, anti-war pacifist who would dismantle the military and were actually surprised to hear about what he's done for veterans.

So I stand by what I said: Ron Paul should have gone on boortz's show; it was a mistake not to have done so and the "excuse" his campaign manager gave is beyond lame.

Ron Paul will continue to get my financial support, however, things such as this sure make me think twice. I have to wonder if the staff even cares about winning.

 

[ButchHowdy]

Unless of course . . . the 'snub' will have more impact than the interview would have.

Boortz mentioned having an interview with Rand Paul yesterday. Wonder how it went.

 

[readyja]

emilysdad,

Don't let number of posts color your opinion. I have made tremendous sacrifices and have worked very long and hard to try to get Ron Paul elected, as have many others.

Yes, hear hear. Just because I think the campaign made a huge error today doesn't mean I'm changing my support, holding back money, or anything like that. I've personally sent nearly 4,000 bumperstickers for goodness sake - I'm not about to quit now.

My disappointment is the lost opportunity to reach out to new voters, new sources of money, and new, enthusiastic supporters.