Dr. Paul at 2% in Newsweek poll

[Bradley in DC]

Newsweek Poll conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International. June 20-21, 2007. N=324 registered Republicans and leaners nationwide. MoE ± 8.

Preference for Republican Presidential Nominee: %
Rudy Giuliani 27
Fred Thompson 19
John McCain 15
Mitt Romney 12
Mike Huckabee 4
Tommy Thompson 2
Sam Brownback 2
Michael Bloomberg 2
Ron Paul 2
Tom Tancredo 1
Jim Gilmore -
Duncan Hunter -
Other 1
None/No preference 5
Unsure 8

 

[Seer]

Who the hell voted for Tommy Thompson?

 

[Texan4Life]

Why would anyone vote for bloomy?

lol.. why would anyone vote for someone other than RP?

 

[Phil M]

Why did they include Bloomberg? Does Newsweek not understand how primaries work or something?

 

[akalucas]

MoE ± 8%!! this poll is meaningless, even for the top 5. So basically McCain could have 7% and Ron Paul 10%.

 

[Bradley in DC]

MoE ± 8%!! this poll is meaningless, even for the top 5. So basically McCain could have 7% and Ron Paul 10%.

Give it another month or two after the next debate!

 

[LibertyEagle]

Huckabee's probably rose to 4% because of him stressing his background as a pastor in the last debate. I can't remember.... was that before or after he agreed with a preemptive nuclear strike on Iran?

 

[angelatc]

I'm just happy to see Dr. Paul place at all! If he can double that 2% every month between now and the primary......

 

[MsDoodahs]

I found Huckabee's sermonette at the debate very unsettling, and I'm probably not the only one.

 

[CJLauderdale4]

MoE +/- 8%. I love that. As an engineer, I laugh at polls that show results lower than the MoE. What if I did that at work when designing aircraft or software??

Obviously these polls are meaningless when 11/15 choices are showing up lower than the MoE.

 

[Bradley in DC]

Huckabee's probably rose to 4% because of him stressing his background as a pastor in the last debate. I can't remember.... was that before or after he agreed with a preemptive nuclear strike on Iran?

Well, if you don't believe in evolution, I guess that justifies it, right?

 

[mikelovesgod]

When was evolution some kind of fact? It's always a theory. For someone to not believe a theory isn't the worst thing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics has convinced people that evolution is still just a theory because entropy is hard to explain away in living bodies.

 

[MsDoodahs]

MoE had me snickering here, too.

Just more propoganda from TPTB in their effort to sway opinion.

 

[jj111]

When was evolution some kind of fact? It's always a theory. For someone to not believe a theory isn't the worst thing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics has convinced people that evolution is still just a theory because entropy is hard to explain away in living bodies.

Isn't it the third law of thermodynamcs that has to do with entropy?

 

[jj111]

This thread is BULLHOCKEY!!!!!!!

 

[Bradley in DC]

When was evolution some kind of fact? It's always a theory. For someone to not believe a theory isn't the worst thing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics has convinced people that evolution is still just a theory because entropy is hard to explain away in living bodies.

I never said it was a fact. Wasn't meant as a slam on the evolution debate, just on the faulty logic and inconsistencies of Huckabee's positions. No offense intended (well, not to you, just the Huckster, I suppose).