Dr. Mercola interviews Ron Paul!

Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
16,041
Apparently, Dr. Paul finds time to maintain a rigorous exercise plan while running for president. That leaves us no excuse, people! Stay healthy.

On another hand, I had no idea Dr. Mercola took an interest in Dr. Paul.

[video]http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/08/28/ron-paul-on-defending-health-freedom.aspx?e_cid=20110828_SNL_Art_1[/video]
 
I'd rather him associate with Alex Jones. :(

Would your care to elaborate on why you feel this way?

I saw Mercola personally in 2000-2002 and he did BY FAR more than any main stream doctor has in reducing the severity my severe mold allergies.
 
Would your care to elaborate on why you feel this way?

I saw Mercola personally in 2000-2002 and he did BY FAR more than any main stream doctor has in reducing the severity my severe mold allergies.

Mercola is regarded as a quack by nearly every doctor in the industry. Some of his claims and recommendations range from strange to dangerous.

It's like being interviewed by this guy:
trudeau.png




"FDA Warnings

In 2005, the FDA ordered Mercola and his Optimal Wellness Center to stop making illegal claims for products sold through his Web site [9]. The claims to which the FDA objected involved three products:

Living Fuel Rx, claimed to offer an "exceptional countermeasure" against cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, etc.
Tropical Traditions Virgin Coconut Oil, claimed to reduce the risk of heart disease and has beneficial effects against Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and many infectious agents
Chlorella, claimed to fight cancer and normalize blood pressure.

In 2006, the FDA sent Mercola and his center a second warning that was based on product labels collected during an inspection at his facility and on claims made on the Optimum Wellness Center Web site [10]. This time the claims to which the FDA objected involve four products:

Vibrant Health Research Chlorella XP, claimed to "help to virtually eliminate your risk of developing cancer in the future."
Fresh Shores Extra Virgin Coconut Oil, claimed to reduce the risk of heart disease, cancer, and degenerative diseases.
Momentum Health Products Vitamin K2, possibly useful in treating certain kinds of cancer and Alzheimer's disease.
Momentum Health Products Cardio Essentials Nattokinase NSK-SD, claimed to be "a much safer and effective option than aspirin and other pharmaceutical agents to treating heart disease."

The warning letters explained that the use of such claims in the marketing of these products violates the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, which bans unapproved claims for products that are intended for curing, mitigating, treating, or preventing of diseases. (Intended use can be established through product labels, catalogs, brochures, tapes, Web sites, or other circumstances surrounding the distribution of the product.)

In 2011, the FDA ordered Mercola to stop making claims for thermography that go beyond what the equipment he uses (Medtherm2000 infrared camera) was cleared for. The warning letter said that statements on Mercola's site improperly imply that the Meditherm camera can be used alone to diagnose or screen for various diseases or conditions associated with the breast, they also represent that the sensitivity of the Meditherm Med2000 Telethermographic camera is greater than that of machines used in mammography. The statements to which the FDA objected included:

"Revolutionary and Safe Diagnostic Tool Detects Hidden Inflammation: Thermography"
"The Newest Safe Cancer Screening Tool"
"ecause measuring inflammation through thermal imaging is a proactive, preventative method you can use for detecting disease, which significantly improves your chances for longevity and good health."
Additionally, thermograms provide: "Reliable and accurate information for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis…"
"Yes, it's true. Thermograms provide you with early diagnosis and treatment assistance in such problems as cancer, inflammatory processes, neurological and vascular dysfunction, and musculoskeletal injury."
Thermography can benefit patients by detecting conditions including: Arthritis: "[d]ifferentiate between osteoarthritis and more severe forms like rheumatoid." Immune Dysfunction, Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue, "Digestive Disorders: Irritable bowel syndrome, diverticulitis, and Crohn's disease…" and "Other Conditions: including bursitis, herniated discs, ligament or muscle tear, lupus, nerve problems, whiplash, stroke screening, cancer and many, many others." [11]

The Chicago Tribune has reported that Mercola has not complied with the FDA's order and intends to "fight the FDA . . . if they decide to take it further." [12]"
 
I'm fairly certain he endorsed Ron Paul in the '08 election too.

He promoted RonPaul2008 extremely aggressively but he's been a public supporter of Ron Paul long before that election.

He's about freedom of choice for healthcare options.... whereas the mainstream media. and government for that matter, would have us believe that the ONLY viable options are corporate health care.

Most of us here have come to see the dangers of corporate media so I would expect most of us here to be skeptical of corporate medicine just as much.

Mercola's position on freedom of healthcare choices is a natural fit with the R3VOLution.
 
Really? Because the FDA says so. That's your excuse for not wanting to listen to so called "quack" doctors. Well I happen to think it's quack medicine to inject cancer patients with radioactive drugs that in turn cause cancer themselves but since it's approved by the FDA it awesome medicine. Thanks for enlightening me. You didn't happen to be called TMosley in a former life by chance, were you?

Mercola is regarded as a quack by nearly every doctor in the industry. Some of his claims and recommendations range from strange to dangerous.

It's like being interviewed by this guy:
trudeau.png




"FDA Warnings

In 2005, the FDA ordered Mercola and his Optimal Wellness Center to stop making illegal claims for products sold through his Web site [9]. The claims to which the FDA objected involved three products:

Living Fuel Rx, claimed to offer an "exceptional countermeasure" against cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, etc.
Tropical Traditions Virgin Coconut Oil, claimed to reduce the risk of heart disease and has beneficial effects against Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and many infectious agents
Chlorella, claimed to fight cancer and normalize blood pressure.

In 2006, the FDA sent Mercola and his center a second warning that was based on product labels collected during an inspection at his facility and on claims made on the Optimum Wellness Center Web site [10]. This time the claims to which the FDA objected involve four products:

Vibrant Health Research Chlorella XP, claimed to "help to virtually eliminate your risk of developing cancer in the future."
Fresh Shores Extra Virgin Coconut Oil, claimed to reduce the risk of heart disease, cancer, and degenerative diseases.
Momentum Health Products Vitamin K2, possibly useful in treating certain kinds of cancer and Alzheimer's disease.
Momentum Health Products Cardio Essentials Nattokinase NSK-SD, claimed to be "a much safer and effective option than aspirin and other pharmaceutical agents to treating heart disease."

The warning letters explained that the use of such claims in the marketing of these products violates the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, which bans unapproved claims for products that are intended for curing, mitigating, treating, or preventing of diseases. (Intended use can be established through product labels, catalogs, brochures, tapes, Web sites, or other circumstances surrounding the distribution of the product.)

In 2011, the FDA ordered Mercola to stop making claims for thermography that go beyond what the equipment he uses (Medtherm2000 infrared camera) was cleared for. The warning letter said that statements on Mercola's site improperly imply that the Meditherm camera can be used alone to diagnose or screen for various diseases or conditions associated with the breast, they also represent that the sensitivity of the Meditherm Med2000 Telethermographic camera is greater than that of machines used in mammography. The statements to which the FDA objected included:

"Revolutionary and Safe Diagnostic Tool Detects Hidden Inflammation: Thermography"
"The Newest Safe Cancer Screening Tool"
"ecause measuring inflammation through thermal imaging is a proactive, preventative method you can use for detecting disease, which significantly improves your chances for longevity and good health."
Additionally, thermograms provide: "Reliable and accurate information for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis…"
"Yes, it's true. Thermograms provide you with early diagnosis and treatment assistance in such problems as cancer, inflammatory processes, neurological and vascular dysfunction, and musculoskeletal injury."
Thermography can benefit patients by detecting conditions including: Arthritis: "[d]ifferentiate between osteoarthritis and more severe forms like rheumatoid." Immune Dysfunction, Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue, "Digestive Disorders: Irritable bowel syndrome, diverticulitis, and Crohn's disease…" and "Other Conditions: including bursitis, herniated discs, ligament or muscle tear, lupus, nerve problems, whiplash, stroke screening, cancer and many, many others." [11]

The Chicago Tribune has reported that Mercola has not complied with the FDA's order and intends to "fight the FDA . . . if they decide to take it further." [12]"
 
Really? Because the FDA says so. That's your excuse for not wanting to listen to so called "quack" doctors. Well I happen to think it's quack medicine to inject cancer patients with radioactive drugs that in turn cause cancer themselves but since it's approved by the FDA it awesome medicine. Thanks for enlightening me. You didn't happen to be called TMosley in a former life by chance, were you?

Sigh...look... I'm not going to throw out insults about tin foil hats. That said, doctors aren't out there to extort money from you and hide medical cures from the public. Even Ron Paul has referred to raw milk as 'crazy'. While I support an individual's right to ingest whatever crazy concoction he or she chooses, it doesn't make it any less ridiculous.

To answer your question, six years of higher education and thousands of hours reading medical journals are why I choose not to listen to Mercola.
 
I have been on Mercola's email list for many many years and I am completely disenchanted with the medical system we have. They do have their place at times, but with chronic illnesses they are worthless.

You would be surprised how many people even in this movement think the FDA is fine, don't believe in alternative treatments and act as if people should not be allowed to choose what to do with their bodies. It's pretty apparent if you read the health freedom subforum here.

He promoted RonPaul2008 extremely aggressively but he's been a public supporter of Ron Paul long before that election.

He's about freedom of choice for healthcare options.... whereas the mainstream media. and government for that matter, would have us believe that the ONLY viable options are corporate health care.

Most of us here have come to see the dangers of corporate media so I would expect most of us here to be skeptical of corporate medicine just as much.

Mercola's position on freedom of healthcare choices is a natural fit with the R3VOLution.
 
Mercola is regarded as a quack by nearly every doctor in the industry. Some of his claims and recommendations range from strange to dangerous."

Not so long ago Ron Paul was regarded as a quack by nearly every politician in the country. Even today many voters believe that some of Ron Paul's claims range from strange to dangerous. Take the position of eliminating FEMA in the middle of a huge hurricane for example. Most Ron Paul voters tend to question current doctrine and I would highly recommend you do the same with the current medical doctrine. If you are trained in the field I'd guess you'd benefit from questioning the medical doctrine more than others. The medical industry is intended to generate profits and you've been trained in the medicine that generates profits. I'm an engineer and I'd say the same thing about my industry.

You need to talk with patients of alternative medicine to really find out whether or not alternatives such as Mercola's actually work. You'll know immediately if statistically you find that they believe they benefited. And by the way, if you found that they believed they benefited you might want to be careful chalking it up to the placebo effect. In nearly every such case you'll find that beneficiaries of alternative medicine found that establishment medicine failed them initially... and one has to wonder why the placebo effect wasn't a factor in the mainstream options.

Regarding the FDA, I'd be hard-pressed to find an agency that has been discredited more in terms of placing the corporate interests over the interests of the people.

http://vimeo.com/24821365
 
Last edited:
A personal goal in health care is to find what is complimentary. Conventional and alternative medical venues are both important. Mercola, Quackwatch, Trudeau, FDA must all be approached with a very discerning mind. Not all is at is seems.
 
You need to talk with patients of alternative medicine to really find out whether or not alternatives such as Mercola's actually work. You'll know immediately if statistically you find that they believe they benefited. And by the way, if you found that they believed they benefited you might want to be careful chalking it up to the placebo effect. In nearly every such case you'll find that beneficiaries of alternative medicine found that establishment medicine failed them initially... and one has to wonder why the placebo effect wasn't a factor in the mainstream options.
http://vimeo.com/24821365

You read my mind! I'd be more than willing to endorse holistic medicine if there was any evidence that it worked. I'm not biased against alternative treatment, but simply the evidence is contrary to the claims made or nonexistent in controlled studies. Take raw milk for example, a quick pubmed query returned the following article published in the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics:

"An exclusive, unmodified goat's milk diet can cause significant morbidity and even mortality in infants, including electrolyte imbalances, metabolic acidosis, folate deficiency, and species-specific and nonspecific antigenicity. Unpasteurized goat milk has its additional infectious risks. However, information supporting this practice abounds on the Internet and in specific cultures. Our case report and literature review support the need to strongly advocate against this practice."

Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):e973-7. Epub 2010 Mar 15.


Unfortunately, the majority of people simply Google 'raw milk' or 'raw food' and read websites created with no scientific basis. There's even a movement out there that advocates drinking your own urine daily. I'd urge everyone to consider all of the scientific evidence and to NEVER put stock in anecdotal reports of friends, colleagues, or John Doe on the internet.
 
A personal goal in health care is to find what is complimentary. Conventional and alternative medical venues are both important. Mercola, Quackwatch, Trudeau, FDA must all be approached with a very discerning mind. Not all is at is seems.

Well said.

A corollary to this that I'd like to add is that in a free society we would fight for people's freedom to search for an alternative to conventional treatments even if we didn't believe an alternative existed. In my mind that is the spirit behind the Ron Paul R3VOLution.
 
Well said.

A corollary to this that I'd like to add is that in a free society we would fight for people's freedom to search for an alternative to conventional treatments even if we didn't believe an alternative existed. In my mind that is the spirit behind the Ron Paul R3VOLution.

Yes, Linus, and after just watching Ron with Chris Wallace, Ron is deeply influencing us for the cause of Liberty.

Cheers to you while I drink a tonic of Vitamin C.
 
"FDA Warnings

LOL @ the FDA.
The same FDA that now classifies walnuts as drugs.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/8294-walnuts-are-drugs-says-fda
The FDA’s letter continues: “We have determined that your walnut products are promoted for conditions that cause them to be drugs because these products are intended for use in the prevention, mitigation, and treatment of disease.” Furthermore, the products are also “misbranded” because they “are offered for conditions that are not amenable to self-diagnosis and treatment by individuals who are not medical practitioners; therefore, adequate directions for use cannot be written so that a layperson can use these drugs safely for their intended purposes.” Who knew you had to have directions to eat walnuts?

That's right, a nut manufacturer can't make claims backed up by dozens of peer-reviewed studies; but they have no problem with potato chips being labled "heart healthy". GTFO with that FDA nonsense.
 
Sigh...look... I'm not going to throw out insults about tin foil hats. That said, doctors aren't out there to extort money from you and hide medical cures from the public. Even Ron Paul has referred to raw milk as 'crazy'. While I support an individual's right to ingest whatever crazy concoction he or she chooses, it doesn't make it any less ridiculous.

To answer your question, six years of higher education and thousands of hours reading medical journals are why I choose not to listen to Mercola.

You obviously have no idea what you're talking about if you think Ron Paul regards raw milk as 'crazy'. The pharmaceutical industry's only incentive is to sell more drugs. Often, there are absolutely no studies that back up these drugs. You have grandmas walking into their doctor's office with a grocery bag full of different kinds of drugs, and you think that's legit? Doctors even tell you often that there is "no known cure" for most diseases. Instead, they say, they can control your symptoms if you take this drug for an extended period of time. Often, that extended period ends up being the patient's whole life, and they never get healthy to the point where they can get OFF the drugs!

Frankly, it's sickening how some people can think that this is legit science when, in fact, pharmaceuticals kill hundreds of thousands of Americans each year. How do you justify that? How can this even be regarded as 'medicine' if it is KILLING hundreds of thousands of people every year? Medicine doesn't kill people. Most drugs these days include potentially life-threatening "side-effects" which are actually just effects. It's okay to you to just drug everyone as long as it's only 100,000 people that die from it? What if you walked into a restaurant that boasted that they had only had a couple thousand people die that year from eating their food. Would you feel comfortable eating there? What has to happen for you to question the conventional "wisdom" of the FDA and its bogus claims? Why do you have such faith in pharmaceuticals? They don't make you healthy, and they often kill people. How can anyone regard that as morally acceptable, or good medicine? How?

This is based on one undeniable truth: there is more money to be made in people's sickness than in their health. If you can get people addicted to drugs and convince them they need to take them their whole lives, then you don't have to worry about their health, as long as the drugs make them feel "better" by helping them lose their ability to feel. If you actually cured somebody and they walked away knowing how to take care of themselves, then you wouldn't make nearly as much money. Heck, you might even have to rely on your skills to sell your services instead of some government agency, like the FDA. Why would these people bother making people healthy if they could get rich by making people sick? Do you really think every doctor is a beacon of good will and altruity? To think anyone on this board hasn't seen beyond the pharmaceutical hoax is reprehensible to me, but I hope you will come to see the truth and stop willfully blinding yourself to the obvious. The truth lies beyond the corporate-controlled healthcare system. The system is built around trapping people in an endless circle of drugs and reliance on mainstream doctors to discourage competition.

 
You read my mind! I'd be more than willing to endorse holistic medicine if there was any evidence that it worked. I'm not biased against alternative treatment, but simply the evidence is contrary to the claims made or nonexistent in controlled studies. Take raw milk for example, a quick pubmed query returned the following article published in the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics:

"An exclusive, unmodified goat's milk diet can cause significant morbidity and even mortality in infants, including electrolyte imbalances, metabolic acidosis, folate deficiency, and species-specific and nonspecific antigenicity. Unpasteurized goat milk has its additional infectious risks. However, information supporting this practice abounds on the Internet and in specific cultures. Our case report and literature review support the need to strongly advocate against this practice."

Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):e973-7. Epub 2010 Mar 15.


Unfortunately, the majority of people simply Google 'raw milk' or 'raw food' and read websites created with no scientific basis. There's even a movement out there that advocates drinking your own urine daily. I'd urge everyone to consider all of the scientific evidence and to NEVER put stock in anecdotal reports of friends, colleagues, or John Doe on the internet.

Yet again... who is funding the studies accessible by pubmed? Who's paying for studies on natural treatments that can't be patented?

FYI, I'm a previous and extremely happy patient of Mercola. When I was in third grade I went into anaphylactic shock from mold exposure. My teacher at the time had us experimenting with various cultures to see what molds would develop. I was a curious lad and studied carefully each and every petri dish; I ended up in the hospital with a swollen tongue and nearly needed a tracheotomy. Thus it is clear that I have severe mold allergies.

Prior to seeing Mercola I had a span of nearly 17 consecutive winters with either bronchitis or full blown pneumonia. In my first year of grad school I had bronchitis for the entire year and I developed a bronchial spasm. I was on an albuterol inhaler for 15 of those years and had to go on a second steroid inhaler for the spasm. I saw numerous conventional allergy doctors. I presume you can only imagine how many times I was prescribed abx in that 17 year span.

I saw Mercola in a September and by the following November I was off my inhalers. That was 11 years ago and I haven't used an inhaler once since.

It took a couple years to get the lung infections under control. Now I have a regimen, which includes Mercola's now famous vitamin D-3 recommendation, that I use immediately when I feel a lung infection starting... year after year now I can eliminate the problem within 48 hours. I'm crossing my figures that this regimen continues to work, but for the time being, my quality of life is a hundred times better than it used to be.

You might be interested in knowing that my hair had 5 heavy metals elevated at various times early in Mercola's assessment. Two heavy metals were exceptionally high. Mercola managed to bring these levels down within the normal range using a strategy that included but was not limited to chlorella. In fact when I take chlorella the heavy metals in my hair are usually zero. If i stop the chlorella the heavy metals tend to rise in the months following.

So I ask, is there a study existing that suggests the heavy metals were the ultimate cause of my mold allergies and lung infections? I wouldn't be surprised that there is not. Do I care? NOT IN THE LEAST!! Much of what is happening in alternative medicine pertains to clinical observation. Just because science doesn't support a treatment doesn't mean it doesn't work. I would respectfully request that you support my right to continued access to these treatments even in lue of scientific evidence that they work.

And by the way, regarding milk, it turns out that I'm also allergic to cow milk.... pasteurized cow milk that is. If I consume pasteurized cow milk I develop inner ear and joint pain, usually within minutes. However, I can drink http://organicpastures.com/ raw milk by the quart daily without an twinge of discomfort. And damn does it taste good!
 
Last edited:
I haven't really paid much attention to Mercola over the years but I am a client of both Dr. David Williams and Dr. Stephen Sinatra. They have plenty of cutting edge nutritional supplements that make me a well oiled machine. Their absorption and purity rates are among the highest out there. I imagine that most of these alternative Drs are pretty much in the same ball park. Since I've never had any chronic health related issues, I can't attest to some of the more outlandish treatment options being proposed by some of them but I do stand by the nutritional products that many of them put out.
 
Back
Top