Reuters uses online polling which has proven to be the least reliable method.
Or losing. Since most polls have some bias, a tally of all polls tends to give you a better picture. RealClearPolitics tries to do that. Focus only on the ones who give the result you want to see may lead one to a big disappointment when votes are actually cast.
I hadn't noticed this post before. Pretty amazing. KY with the same number of electoral votes as CA. And both NJ and MA with even more.I would call this election the biggest landslide of the past century:
![]()
25% difference between Republicans and Democrats.
Some earlier elections like 1789, 1792, and 1820 were even larger landslides.
I just want to take the high road here and thank CPUd and all just like her for helping get DJ DonMaster Trump elected. America thanks you, too.Donald Trump is poised to lose in the biggest landslide in modern American history
Trump isn't merely going to lose. He's going to lose in the biggest popular vote landslide in modern presidential history.
I just want to take the high road here and thank CPUd and all just like her for helping get DJ DonMaster Trump elected. America thanks you, too.
I hadn't noticed this post before. Pretty amazing. KY with the same number of electoral votes as CA. And both NJ and MA with even more.
My, how the country has changed in just a few generations.
People shoulda stayed home.![]()
Florida - 6
Great thread. There's got to be a bunch more similar to this with "accurate" predictions using the now widely accepted invalid polling. Would be nice to get a nice compilation of these types of threads.
Just search for threads started by CPUd - http://www.ronpaulforums.com/search.php?do=process&searchuser=CPUd&exactname=1