Donald Trump is NOT a 'threat to the deep state'. Here is his warmongering record.

[...] white people can be DEI hires, too. For example, there are plenty of white cops who are too fat or too short for the job, to say nothing of their level of aptitude or skills. In the past, such people were weeded out immediately. Now, the lowered standards mean they are just as likely as anyone else, to be given a position they can't perform well.

IIRC, NYPD (and other police departments, too?) had - and may still have - an upper limit for the IQ for new recruits.

That's an upper limit, not a lower limit (though I suppose they might have one of those, too).
 
I watched the 50min bullshit video and it has hundreds of lies and misrepresentations. I have a day job and don't have the time nor the interest in explaining it to you for the hundredth time. What I know is I was much better off during the Trump years, we had more peace, prosperity, and freedom than any President during my lifetime, and the deep state was in opposition to his actions every step of the way and have used every type of assassination against him. Character assassination, legal assassination, political assassination. And when none of that worked, they tried death by assassination. They do this to people that are a threat to the deep state. If he was no threat, they wouldn't bother with all this.

https://www.americanthinker.com/art..._the_desperate_effort_to_eliminate_trump.html
 
I can't believe that after nearly 10 years of Donald being forced into our faces 24/7/365 by the Mockingbird media and tech elites that whether he's a "threat to the Deep State" is still a question worth even considering. It's ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe that after nearly 10 years of Donald being forced into our faces 24/7/365 by the Mockingbird media and tech elites that whether he's a "thread to the Deep State" is still a question worth even considering. It's ridiculous.

Then why impeach him and try to kill him? If he was beneficial to the deep state he wouldn't even need SS protection. The bushs, Clintons, and the Cheneys have all been embarrassed and practically kicked out of political power. Thank you Trump!
 
If Trump was a threat to the deep state, they would have killed him decades ago.

Butler PA was a kill shot, he would be dead if he didn't turn his head at the last second. Maybe you would prefer if he didn't survive?
 
Last edited:
You denounce every second of a fifty-three minute vid in fifteen minutes flat, during which time you were throwing "Leave Trump alone!!" temper tantrums in three different threads, and we're supposed to believe you did that for any reason except blind faith?

All of the things in this video have been dealt with many times over, it's old and debunked.
It a bunch of misrepresentation and exaggeration that cherry picks and ignores all the good he did.
 
Butler PA was a kill shot, he would be dead if he didn't turn his head at the last second. Maybe you would prefer if he didn't survive?
Many make it clear that is their preference.
Marking them as either enemy moles, or compulsive losers who are only happy when they get to complain about losing.
 
Obama : "Blow up Libya and Syria for democracy."

Trump : "Make sure you get the oil or don't do it."

That's about the extent of the improvement.

We left Afghanistan and Somalia because of him, we didn't get into a war with Iran in spite of the deepstate's desperate attempts and Iran's attempts to provoke it, he tried to get us out of Syria but the Pentagon lied and defied him about it, he reduced the troop levels many other places and would have done more but Congress passed budgets requiring him to get permission from the deepstate to reduce troop levels in places like S. Korea, and he deescalated in many places like N. Korea, etc. etc. etc.
 
Then why impeach him and try to kill him? If he was beneficial to the deep state he wouldn't even need SS protection. The bushs, Clintons, and the Cheneys have all been embarrassed and practically kicked out of political power. Thank you Trump!

LOL! Yet here we are, still. Impeachment, kill shots, and nothing actually happens except more media coverage and poll results.

Sounds legit. Carry on.
 
LOL! Yet here we are, still. Impeachment, kill shots, and nothing actually happens except more media coverage and poll results.

Sounds legit. Carry on.

Evil is not omnipotent, whether you wish it to be or not.
 
All of the things in this video have been dealt with many times over, it's old and debunked.
It a bunch of misrepresentation and exaggeration that cherry picks and ignores all the good he did.

And you checked all fifty-three minutes of it in fifteen before giving us your solemn word of this.

Evil is not omnipotent, whether you wish it to be or not.

He doesn't wish that, and it's incredibly rude and antisocial to imply he does. He just wishes more people could recognize evil when they see it.
 
We left Afghanistan and Somalia because of him, we didn't get into a war with Iran in spite of the deepstate's desperate attempts and Iran's attempts to provoke it, he tried to get us out of Syria but the Pentagon lied and defied him about it, he reduced the troop levels many other places and would have done more but Congress passed budgets requiring him to get permission from the deepstate to reduce troop levels in places like S. Korea, and he deescalated in many places like N. Korea, etc. etc. etc.

Afghanistan doesn't have oil. Somalia doesn't have oil. He brought us closer to war with Iran than did Obama or Biden through his assasination of Sulimani and taking us out of the Iran nuclear deal. He's on video saying he kept troops in Syria to keep the oil. North Korea doesn't have oil and if they did there's no way to get it. I give Trump credit for at least being honest about his reasoning (going for the oil) and not pushing for wars where getting the oil isn't on the table.
 
Afghanistan doesn't have oil. Somalia doesn't have oil. He brought us closer to war with Iran than did Obama or Biden through his assasination of Sulimani and taking us out of the Iran nuclear deal. He's on video saying he kept troops in Syria to keep the oil. North Korea doesn't have oil and if they did there's no way to get it. I give Trump credit for at least being honest about his reasoning (going for the oil) and not pushing for wars where getting the oil isn't on the table.
Solemani was making war on our embassy to try to start a war, Trump put a stop to it and refused to let a war start.
He came up with a a way to benefit America when the Pentagon refused to leave Syria.
And he tried to open up our oil production so we wouldn't need foreign oil.
 
Solemani was making war on our embassy to try to start a war, Trump put a stop to it and refused to let a war start.
He came up with a a way to benefit America when the Pentagon refused to leave Syria.
And he tried to open up our oil production so we wouldn't need foreign oil.



:rolleyes:

Again, I give Trump credit for being honest and for at least not wanting to go after countries if they don't have oil. That does make him better than Obama.
 
He came up with a a way to benefit America when the Pentagon refused to leave Syria.
And he tried to open up our oil production so we wouldn't need foreign oil.

The Ultimate Alpha Dealmaker couldn't get the armed forces -- of which he was Commander in Chief at the time -- to follow orders.

So, he responded by making lemonade out of the lemons they dealt him, and by raising their budgets.

You're cucking for a cuck.
 
The Ultimate Alpha Dealmaker couldn't get the armed forces -- of which he was Commander in Chief at the time -- to follow orders.

So, he responded by making lemonade out of the lemons they dealt him, and by raising their budgets.

You're cucking for a cuck.
You're living in a fantasy world, or pretending to, where the deepstate doesn't exist and its members just follow orders.
Trump struggled to get anything done over the resistance of the permanent bureaucracy and Ron would have gotten less done.
 


https://youtu.be/5wwm4OiYY5M


Jul 15, 2024
Following a shooting at a rally in Pennsylvania, Donald Trump's supporters have portrayed him as a so-called "threat to the US deep state". But in reality, Trump was a warmonger as president, and appointed top CIA officials and neoconservatives to run his foreign policy. Ben Norton reviews Trump's support for Israel and Ukraine and his aggressive policies against China, Russia, Palestine, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Bolivia, Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba.


Topics
0:00 (Clips) Trump on Syria, Venezuela, Ukraine
0:32 US politics & bipartisan war crimes
3:29 Alleged assassination attempt against Trump
7:13 Trump's warmongering foreign policy: a summary
11:35 Israel - Palestine
16:56 Trump proposed bombing Russia & China
17:27 Russiagate
18:01 Trump tore up 2 arms treaties with Russia
18:55 Ukraine
20:33 (Clip) Trump boasts of arming Ukraine
20:56 Trump vs Obama on Ukraine weapons
23:02 NATO
24:24 "We're at war with China"
26:24 Trade war & new cold war on China
28:44 Democrats vs Republicans on Russia & China
29:48 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA)
30:44 Assassination of Qasem Soleimani
31:20 Trump's war on Iraq
32:48 US hypocrisy on "political violence"
34:31 Syria
35:00 (Clip) Trump brags of taking Syria's oil
35:27 Afghanistan war & minerals
37:06 Trump wanted to take oil from Libya & Iraq too
38:15 Yemen
39:24 Trump plans to attack Mexico
41:06 Bolivia coup
41:54 Elon Musk & Bolivia's lithium
43:24 Venezuela
44:06 (Clip) Trump on "taking over" Venezuela
44:18 Venezuela coup attempt
46:00 Nicaragua coup attempt
46:37 Elliott Abrams
47:53 Cuba blockade & sanctions
50:09 Tax cuts for the rich
51:54 Billionaires for fellow billionaire Trump
53:16 Outro

|| Geopolitical Economy Report ||



Please consider supporting us at https://GeopoliticalEconomy.com/Support




So....I just looked at claim 18:55 about Trump arming Ukraine. It's verifiable. I was't aware of that. Thanks for posting this [MENTION=40029]PAF[/MENTION].

 
You're living in a fantasy world, or pretending to, where the deepstate doesn't exist and its members just follow orders.
Trump struggled to get anything done over the resistance of the permanent bureaucracy and Ron would have gotten less done.

First, show me proof that he even tried. You say the military flatly refused to follow orders, yet the man championed and passed the creation of a sixth armed force.

"...and Ron would have gotten less done." Nobody on earth can know if something can be done until someone actually tries to do it. Trump has not. Ron Paul would have. And only you are so arrogant that you think you know exactly how that would have come out -- and that we should all believe your half-baked assessment.
 
Back
Top