Donald Trump Calls Hillary Clinton a 'Bigot'

[enhanced_deficit]

Hillary Clinton has been accused in the past of having ties with some prominent figures who have said very controversial things about African-Americans, Jews, Islamic people/children of Islamic people:


Bernie Sanders slams Clinton's "racist" 1996 super predators comment
Bernie Sanders slammed his rival's 1996 use of the term "super predators" Thursday evening, calling it "racist" on stage at the Democratic debate in Brooklyn.
Asked why Sanders had criticized Bill Clinton's defense of his wife use of the phrase "super predators," Sanders responded: "Because it was a racist term and everybody knew it was a racist term."
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-s...ators-comment/

Ice Cube: Hillary Clinton Helped ‘Justify’ a War on Black People

Hillary Clinton praying with Billy Graham

http://www.jpost.com/International/N...-stance-323953

(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP, FEBRUARY 1, 1972)
NIXON: “Newsweek” is totally — it's all run by Jews and dominated by them in their editorial pages. The “New York Times, the “Washington Post”, totally Jewish too.
GRAHAM: And they're the ones putting out the pornographic stuff. But this stranglehold has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain.
NIXON: Do you believe that?
GRAHAM: Yes, sir.
NIXON: I can't ever say it, but I believe it.
GRAHAM: But if you get elected a second time, we might be able to do something.
(END AUDIO CLIP)

2008 Election: Hillary Clinton Tried to Drive Religious Wedge Between Obama and Dems

Clinton campaign released a picture of Barack Obama in a turban during a 2006 visit to Kenya, apparently to encourage the rumors about his connections to Islam.

Monday 25 February 2008
Barack Obama's campaign team today accused Hillary Clinton's beleaguered staff of mounting a desperate dirty tricks operation by circulating a picture of him in African dress, feeding into false claims on US websites that he is a Muslim.
Obama's campaign manager, David Plouffe, described it as "the most shameful, offensive fear-mongering we've seen from either party in this election". Obama has had to spend much of the campaign stressing he is a Christian not a Muslim and did not study at a madrassa.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/200...hillaryclinton


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFREDHB-nQ





But this sort of attack on her from a political opponent is rarely seen in news reports:

Donald Trump Calls Hillary Clinton a 'Bigot'


At a Wednesday rally in Jackson, Mississippi, the 70-year-old GOP nominee beefed up his efforts to put a dent in Clinton's lead among minority voters, labeling her a "bigot" who cares only about votes.

"Hillary Clinton is a bigot who sees people of color only as votes, not as human beings worthy of a better future," the 70-year-old GOP nominee yelled out at a Wednesday rally in Jackson, Mississippi.

"She's going to do nothing for African-Americans, she's going to do nothing for the Hispanics. She's only going to take care of herself, her husband, her consultants, her donors. These are the people she cares about."

http://www.people.com/article/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-bigot-minority-voters




To be devil's advocate, although she voted for Iraq war but more recently Hillary Clinton's DNC convention and other election rallies seem to have almost half of the people on stage who are African-Americans/minorities and a face or two with Islamic Hijab. Would she be going to such lengths to showcase minority faces in her election rallies if she was really a bigot?

Anyways, vote in attached poll.




Related


Trump calls out Hillary Clinton for her support for Israel’s separation wall

 

[juleswin]

The only problem here is that I don't think Trump even with his 100+ IQ doesn't know what the definition of a bigot is. You are not a bigot just because you see African Americans only as votes. It sorta like saying someone is a sexist just because he/she sees the opposite sex(or same sex) as just a sex object. Bigotry means hatred is in the mix and even Trump is not making that case.

 

[CPUd]

The only problem here is that I don't think Trump even with his 100+ IQ doesn't know what the definition of a bigot is. You are not a bigot just because you see African Americans only as votes. It sorta like saying someone is a sexist just because he/she sees the opposite sex(or same sex) as just a sex object. Bigotry means hatred is in the mix and even Trump is not making that case.

Trump has employed a little known tactic in politics demonstrated here:




It is complimentary to a tactic he used in the primaries called, The Argument of a 5 Year Old

 

[hells_unicorn]

Trump has employed a little known tactic in politics demonstrated here:




It is complimentary to a tactic he used in the primaries called, The Argument of a 5 Year Old

Notice who ended up winning the primary. (not that I'm happy about it)

 

[CPUd]

Notice who ended up winning the primary. (not that I'm happy about it)

Yes, he seems to believe what worked in the primaries will work in the general election.

 

[puppetmaster]

Hillary has so many bad traits that this one is one of least offensive

 

[timosman]

Yes, he seems to believe what worked in the primaries will work in the general election.

As much as I admire the depth of your analytical skills when applied to politics, I think you should keep your day job.

 

[hells_unicorn]

Yes, he seems to believe what worked in the primaries will work in the general election.

It might, your sarcasm not withstanding. It's not like the approach that people like Romney and McCain took worked, and as much as it pains me to say it, the Pauls couldn't even pull it out in the primaries.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Yes, he seems to believe what worked in the primaries will work in the general election.

Let's not jump to conclusions yet and wait till all the pollings are completed.

POLL: TRUMP SHRINKS CLINTON LEAD 7 POINTS IN 3 DAYS...

 

[juleswin]

Notice who ended up winning the primary. (not that I'm happy about it)

Its not just that he won the primaries but the way he won it makes it virtually impossible for him to win any other contest after that.

There is a show I like to watch on the Food Network, I don't remember the name but it is a cooking contest where 4 chefs are given a bunch of credit to help them buy their way out of pitfalls and goodies thrown their way. The chefs battle for 3 rounds with one chef getting kicked out in every round. Anyway, every once in a while you see a mediocre chef who buys his way out of the first and even second round and leaving them with no money for the 3rd round.

Trump is that mediocre chef who spend all his capital in the first round with no plan of what to do after that. Trump has spent almost all his political capital winning the primaries and now has nothing to fight Clinton with. And just like in the Food network show, he would get killed by Hillary who has saved all her credit running a politically savvy forward thinking campaign.

 

[adissa]

Let's not jump to conclusions yet and wait till all the pollings are completed.

POLL: TRUMP SHRINKS CLINTON LEAD 7 POINTS IN 3 DAYS...

All of these polls that show who's up or down by how many points are irrelevant. Who's leading the electoral count? That's what matters.

 

[CPUd]

It might, your sarcasm not withstanding. It's not like the approach that people like Romney and McCain took worked, and as much as it pains me to say it, the Pauls couldn't even pull it out in the primaries.

There is a reason the other candidates didn't run the same type of campaign. Populist campaigns rarely work in presidential races because of the scale and diversity of the electorate. George Wallace was very successful with populism at the state level, but it didn't scale well when he ran for president. Trump keeps a support base of 35-40% of the voting GOP, but that is maybe 20% of the general electorate. He adds another 15-20% of "not Hillary" voters, but now he is in a position where he has to give up some of his base in order to attract new supporters. The recent polling has shown he is losing some of that base already, but picking up new support to replace and grow his base will probably take more time than he has.

Rand was really the only candidate who could run the same campaign in the general that he did in the primaries, but he could not win those coalitions unless certain other candidates like Christie and Kasich dropped out. Rand was expecting to be in the mix after Super Tuesday with Cruz, Rubio and Bush.

 

[KEEF]

I said yes, because just like most every other democrat, if they don't bring race, gender, sexuality, etc in every election cycle to continue to divide the people, they would lose so many votes.

My goodness, besides for some socialism, democrats would have nothing left to run on if they truly meant what they talk about in regards to equality.

 

[hells_unicorn]

There is a reason the other candidates didn't run the same type of campaign. Populist campaigns rarely work in presidential races because of the scale and diversity of the electorate. George Wallace was very successful with populism at the state level, but it didn't scale well when he ran for president. Trump keeps a support base of 35-40% of the voting GOP, but that is maybe 20% of the general electorate. He adds another 15-20% of "not Hillary" voters, but now he is in a position where he has to give up some of his base in order to attract new supporters. The recent polling has shown he is losing some of that base already, but picking up new support to replace and grow his base will probably take more time than he has.

Rand was really the only candidate who could run the same campaign in the general that he did in the primaries, but he could not win those coalitions unless certain other candidates like Christie and Kasich dropped out. Rand was expecting to be in the mix after Super Tuesday with Cruz, Rubio and Bush.

Did you just compare Trump's campaign to George Wallace's? And you expect to be taken seriously? I'm not disagreeing with you that Rand was banking on those clowns eventually dropping out, but it didn't happen, and the "diverse electorate" is the primary reason why Rand would have lost in the general even if he'd pulled off a miracle in the primary. The majority of racial minority voting blocks tend to be hostile to rational political discourse, as can be observed in crime statistics of late and why they continually cleave to the Democratic Party.

The country is on a certain path at this point, largely because of the so-called Constitution that everybody continually yammers about, and apart from somebody running a campaign like the one Trump is running, your candidate Hillary would be president by default. I'm sitting this one out, but I'm not blind to the way things are going, and it is largely the case because of people who think like you. Nothing personal, it is what it is.

 

[CPUd]

Did you just compare Trump's campaign to George Wallace's? And you expect to be taken seriously? I'm not disagreeing with you that Rand was banking on those clowns eventually dropping out, but it didn't happen, and the "diverse electorate" is the primary reason why Rand would have lost in the general even if he'd pulled off a miracle in the primary. The majority of racial minority voting blocks tend to be hostile to rational political discourse, as can be observed in crime statistics of late and why they continually cleave to the Democratic Party.

The country is on a certain path at this point, largely because of the so-called Constitution that everybody continually yammers about, and apart from somebody running a campaign like the one Trump is running, your candidate Hillary would be president by default. I'm sitting this one out, but I'm not blind to the way things are going, and it is largely the case because of people who think like you. Nothing personal, it is what it is.

Wallace wasn't a racist either, he just played one on TV. Trump and maybe Ted Cruz are the only GOP candidates capable of losing to Clinton. Rand and many on this site were working to build coalitions with minority voters on issues like police brutality and the 4th Amendment. Instead we have Trump, who encourages his fans to beat protesters. He says the answer to police brutality is to sue the cops, and now we even have people on this site talking authoritatively about "feral blacks" with low IQ.

 

[AuH20]

Wallace wasn't a racist either, he just played one on TV. Trump and maybe Ted Cruz are the only GOP candidates capable of losing to Clinton. Rand and many on this site were working to build coalitions with minority voters on issues like police brutality and the 4th Amendment. Instead we have Trump, who encourages his fans to beat protesters. He says the answer to police brutality is to sue the cops, and now we even have people on this site talking authoritatively about "feral blacks" with low IQ.

Why didn't this wave of minority voters save Rand in the end, if he was so responsive to these alleged core issues? Why weren't they beating down the doors of the voter registration offices to vote for Rand in the Republican primary? I have a crazy theory that those so-called issues are all window dressing and that blacks actually enjoy voting democrat.

 

[nikcers]

Why didn't this wave of minority voters save Rand in the end, if he was so responsive to these alleged core issues? Why weren't they beating down the doors of the voter registration offices to vote for Rand in the Republican primary? I have a crazy theory that those so-called issues are all window dressing and that blacks actually enjoy voting democrat.

People that vote in the general election are not the same people that vote in the primary. See losing the general to win the primary.

 

[CPUd]

Why didn't this wave of minority voters save Rand in the end, if he was so responsive to these alleged core issues? Why weren't they beating down the doors of the voter registration offices to vote for Rand in the Republican primary? I have a crazy theory that those so-called issues are all window dressing and that blacks actually enjoy voting democrat.

Whatever bridges Rand was trying to build were burned down by a loudmouth and his alt white fanboys about a month or 2 after he announced.

 

[oyarde]

I cannot think of any nationally elected Dem of any color from Illinois or the east or west coast that is not a bigot . They go together luck ducks & water .

 

[euphemia]

It is to Hillary's advantage to create division. Obama has done it successfully.