DOGE builds AI tool to cut 50 percent of federal regulations

[Snowball]

I doubt that this is true. But if it is, it's one thing he's right about.

How can you say such a thing? It doesn't appear that you appreciate the enormity of what is transpiring and its repurcussions.

 

[Invisible Man]

How can you say such a thing? It doesn't appear that you appreciate the enormity of what is transpiring and its repurcussions.

On the contrary, I think it's you who fails to appreciate its enormity, since you want the state and the elites the state exists to serve to have a monopoly on the use of AI. Regulations can't prevent the development of the technology. They can only manage who does and doesn't get to use it.

 

[Snowball]

On the contrary, I think it's you who fails to appreciate its enormity, since you want the state and the elites the state exists to serve to have a monopoly on the use of AI. Regulations can't prevent the development of the technology. They can only manage who does and doesn't get to use it.

It's the opposite. Without regulation, the elites will be all who dominate with AI.
Regulations are the only thing that can protect us from it.

 

[TheTexan]

It's the opposite. Without regulation, the elites will be all who dominate with AI.
Regulations are the only thing that can protect us from it.

yes, lets petition the elites to come up with regulations to protect us

 

[Snowball]

yes, lets petition the elites to come up with regulations to protect us

if you think everyone in Congress is "the elites" then how can you support Muh Constitution?

 

[TheTexan]

then how can you support Muh Constitution?

who says I do

 

[Brian4Liberty]

"Standing tough under stars and stripes
We can tell
This dreams in sight
You've got to admit it
At this point in time that it's clear
The future looks bright

A just machine to make big decisions
Programmed by fellows with compassion and vision

We'll be clean when their work is done
We'll be eternally free yes and eternally young"

 

[Brian4Liberty]

While DOGE had pushed earlier this year to take a larger role in the deregulatory effort, the Musk-led team was frequently rebuffed by agency employees who worried about outsourcing decisions and their authorities, according to three people who have participated in deregulatory conversations at the White House and the agency level

"We will not outsource our responsibilities and authority!

(Unless it is to fully embedded special interests and lobbyists.)"

 

[Brian4Liberty]

One HUD employee who participated in this process said the AI tool made several errors.

AI tool wrong? Never!

On a more serious note, I would be really curious as to how AI can interpret mass amounts of law and regulation that often contradicts itself. Garbage in, garbage out.

This may be one case where throwing the baby out with the bath water is perfectly acceptable. Discard 1000 useless regs and accidently delete a "good" one? No problem. If it really is a useful and necessary regulation, add it back.

 

[Invisible Man]

It's the opposite. Without regulation, the elites will be all who dominate with AI.
Regulations are the only thing that can protect us from it.

Why would the elites want to impose regulations that do that?

It is not possible for the state to provide us any defense from the elites. They are the ones who control the state. If we want to strengthen ourselves, we have to weaken the state.

Besides, what conceivable regulations are you even thinking about? We simply can't stop the forward march of technology with regulations. It is going to happen.

 

[Snowball]

Why would the elites want to impose regulations that do that?

It is not possible for the state to provide us any defense from the elites. They are the ones who control the state. If we want to strengthen ourselves, we have to weaken the state.

Besides, what conceivable regulations are you even thinking about? We simply can't stop the forward march of technology with regulations. It is going to happen.

Like I posted this morning, the founder of AI and others, including Musk last year, called for regulations, as have other world notables. The regulations are necessary to limit and procure AI in reasonable and responsible ways that respect laws of all kinds. Without guidelines and limits, AI will run rampant. The AI itself is capable of targeting laws and procedures meant to limit its use as problematic. This doesn't mean it has a will, but it means the oligarchs and technocrats formatted it that way. Since nobody of consequence (myself, for instance), is for outright bans on AI, its adaptation and its development must fall under some human oversight -- that oversight should be responsible to the public, i.e. our elected officials and our courts. The government is your only source of authority in today's world. To refuse to use your rights as a citizen and seek to have a voice in government and legislative affairs is to lay down and rescind your duty and your rights to an unanswerable globalist elite that want to take everything over. They hate regulations and public power because it challenges them and can restrain them from doing bad things, either intentionally or unintentionally. Technology is always subject to regulation and it is a tool and an object for our benefit, not a power beyond our ability to manage - that's how it must stay. To give that up, is to lose the battle entirely.

 

[Invisible Man]

Like I posted this morning, the founder of AI and others, including Musk last year, called for regulations, as have other world notables.

That doesn't seem to me to be a point in your favor.

that oversight should be responsible to the public

Ergo, it should not be exercised by the state.

 

[Snowball]

That doesn't seem to me to be a point in your favor.



Ergo, it should not be exercised by the state.

It does once you understand he's not part of the cabal. He's an older gentleman whose science was bought out and abused.
Here's a YT chan you might take a look at, to understand some of my viewpoints.

Dr. Deep State

Censored News: Dr. Deep State explores the patterns behind world events - unearthing the ever-shifting landscapes of technology, spirituality, and societal transformation that we suggest are designed to culminate with the internet of bodies. We examine how the historical and philosophical...

www.youtube.com

 

[PAF]

It's the opposite. Without regulation, the elites will be all who dominate with AI.
Regulations are the only thing that can protect us from it.

I have been very outspoken concerning the dangers of AI and the Technocratic Society and can clearly see where it is headed [if not already].

But, Regulations/Bans are not the “solution”,,,

Defunding the apparatus/agency/program/“the state” is.

Unfortunately, like TSA and other horrendous programs, as long as people get to keep their shoes on, people really don’t care.

 

[Snowball]

I have been very outspoken concerning the dangers of AI and the Technocratic Society and can clearly see where it is headed [if not already].

But, Regulations/Bans are not the “solution”,,,

Defunding the apparatus/agency/program/“the state” is.

Unfortunately, like TSA and other horrendous programs, as long as people get to keep their shoes on, people really don’t care.

There are already procedures and laws which restrain AI, but Trump is gorging them apart, and using AI and the AI lords he is affiliated with to unrestrict its own restrictions. Congress and agency staff are our only way of mitigating the AI takeover, since the president is on the other side.
We already had limitations on AI. Trump tossed them.

Saying we're going to "defund the apparatus/agency/program/"the state" is just not practical at all.

 

[Invisible Man]

Saying we're going to "defund the apparatus/agency/program/"the state" is just not practical at all.

Making such a prediction for the short-term would be foolhardy. But if that ever did happen (and it will eventually, because anything that can't go on forever won't), it would be supremely practical.

 

[PAF]

Saying we're going to "defund the apparatus/agency/program/"the state" is just not practical at all.

That seems to be the popular/desired consensus and why it or anything is inevitable.

 

[acptulsa]

Saying we're going to "defund the apparatus/agency/program/"the state" is just not practical at all.

And you think government telling itself not to do something is practical?

 

[Snowball]

And you think government telling itself not to do something is practical?

We are so screwed.

 

[Occam's Banana]