Does someone have the video showing the backpack being dropped?

:rolleyes: @ your silly smartass comment. I made a simple request for a video. Thank you for the picture though. So the evidence we have so far is this:

1) No picture of the suspect dropping the backpack
2) No video of the backpack being dropped
3) Video of the suspect walking passed the drop zone shows him still with the backpack.
4) We have a photograph of him standing in a crowd and a backpack on the ground, but it seems to be two rows in front of him. He dropped of the backpack in front of the crowd and then moved back?

So, so far there's no direct evidence released linking him to the bombing. Just circumstantial. (He's in a crowd with a zillion other people and there is a backpack on the ground and earlier he had a backpack on his arm).

And, of course, the pictures of the military types walking around with backpacks are now just a memory.

2rnvjh0.jpg
 
Thanks. But the picture is inconclusive. Remember, his backpack was slung over his right shoulder. In this video there are times when it looks like he doesn't have a backpack, but as he keeps walking you see that he does.



There's a picture of the kid with the white hat running without his backpack after the explosion.

CBzf8r0.jpg
 
So, so far there's no direct evidence released linking him to the bombing. Just circumstantial. .


An overwhelming number of convictions result from circumstantial evidence. The proverbial smoking gun is relatively rare.

We have a guy who had his legs blown off who saw the older brother put down a backpack that exploded. We have a picture of the younger brother backing away from an abandoned backpack.

We have a picture of him leaving the scene without a backpack.

You have undercover cops carrying backpacks.
 
He's not far enough away in that picture to matter, silly. :rolleyes: And the backpack in the picture you posted doesn't look the like one that was found exploded.

Yes, it does. It looks exactly like the one that as exploded.
 

Strawman. I haven't in this thread assigned guilt or innocence to anyone. I'm saying, if the FBI has a video that conclusively shows this suspect planting a backpack, where is it?

As for government involvement in terror, we do know the FBI was involved in 1993.

 
Oh, but anyone can find an inconclusive photo that backs up a particular theory.

LL


Do you have an eyewitness indicating this man isn't holding his backpack in front of him, and in fact, set it down where the eyewitnesses legs used to be?
 
An overwhelming number of convictions result from circumstantial evidence. The proverbial smoking gun is relatively rare.

We have a guy who had his legs blown off who saw the older brother put down a backpack that exploded. We have a picture of the younger brother backing away from an abandoned backpack.

We have a picture of him leaving the scene without a backpack.

You have undercover cops carrying backpacks.

You have a video that you say exists but hasn't been released.
 
I don't understand why people keep bringing up the military guys with backpacks. If this was a false flag attack they sure as hell wouldn't have guys wearing military uniforms carry it out.
 
Do you have an eyewitness indicating this man isn't holding his backpack in front of him, and in fact, set it down where the eyewitnesses legs used to be?

Do you have the FBI video? Or are you saying now that there is no FBI video and it's all based on an eyewitness? If that's your position, just state it.
 
Thanks. But the picture is inconclusive. Remember, his backpack was slung over his right shoulder. In this video there are times when it looks like he doesn't have a backpack, but as he keeps walking you see that he does.



What about the guy in the doorway with ear piece?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cap
You have a video that you say exists but hasn't been released.


I should clarify that I read somewhere that the FBI said they had that video, but it won't shock me if it turns out that a reporter misspoke about that, too. Let's say it doesn't exist.


That doesn't change any of the items on my list.
 
I should clarify that I read somewhere that the FBI said they had that video, but it won't shock me if it turns out that a reporter misspoke about that, too. Let's say it doesn't exist.


That doesn't change any of the items on my list.

Fine. You don't know and you're looking for evidence just like the rest of us. You're just more apt to believe the official story...minus the "they hate us for our freedoms and loose morals" part. I don't know why it took so long to get to the obvious.
 
Do you have the FBI video? Or are you saying now that there is no FBI video and it's all based on an eyewitness? If that's your position, just state it.


OK, like I said - no way is anybody ever going to convince you of anything you don't want to believe. I'm outta here. Carry on.
 
OK, like I said - no way is anybody ever going to convince you of anything you don't want to believe. I'm outta here. Carry on.

I wasn't asking to be "convinced." I asked for a particular piece of evidence. You didn't have it. Why you have to be a jerk about it I don't know.
 
Angela is right, even without the FBI's alleged video of a bag being dropped, there is a lot of damning evidence against white hat guy.

Plus, how does anyone explain away them shooting at cops and throwing bombs at them?

How would the media fake that?

Of course there could still be all kinds of government involvement, but clearly these guys are AWOL.
 
Back
Top