Pundits: Does anyone take Gary North seriously anymore?

If you go to my blog, you'll see I do that. At least you admit he is weird on some things. :) (Like when he said governments lie, cheat and steal, and then called for government enforcement of contracts).

Yeah, so did all of the classical liberals. Go figure.
 
gary north bats for banksterism? you must be out of your mind.a govt gold standard is a minarchist position.it is not a free market idea.what is so difficult to understand about it?
 
Nope. After I learned about his history with y2k he lost all credibility with me. I wish he would just disappear into the shadows - he is no good.
 
Nope. After I learned about his history with y2k he lost all credibility with me. I wish he would just disappear into the shadows - he is no good.

Yes, his credibility surely took a hit for that. But he has apologized profusely for it since then, and publicly said he was wrong and ashamed for promoting it.

I actually gained more respect for Gary after reading his articles about how wrong and sorry he was for the Y2K thing. It takes a big man to admit he was wrong.
 
gary north bats for banksterism? you must be out of your mind.a govt gold standard is a minarchist position.it is not a free market idea.what is so difficult to understand about it?

He is against a government-backed gold standard to the extent that the government enforces the backing of the currency with a certain level of gold reserves, and I agree with him that it is a fool's gold standard.

As for a free market gold standard, he even admits that one has never existed, and that the closest thing that ever came to it was for a few years in the then relatively sparsely populated California during the Gold Rush.

My article on him being a spokesperson for a major Federal Reserve smokescreen was him taking exception with Ellen Brown calling the Fed private. While it has public aspects, I don't think it's inaccurate to call it private, when it's 100% privately owned.
 
Yes, his credibility surely took a hit for that. But he has apologized profusely for it since then, and publicly said he was wrong and ashamed for promoting it.

I actually gained more respect for Gary after reading his articles about how wrong and sorry he was for the Y2K thing. It takes a big man to admit he was wrong.

Can you post at least one article wherein he did that? I did a Google search on his site for any references to Y2K, and it only came back with 8 hits, and none of them make reference to an apology.
 
First, he claimed Y2K was going to be the closest thing to Armageddon. Then he claimed gold and silver coins produced by the U.S. and Canadian Mints aren't money, and then he called a government-guaranteed gold standard a fool's gold standard, while proposing his own so-called free market gold standard that is also a fool's gold standard, in calling for government enforcement of contracts.

Today, as Apple stock hit $600 per share -- a 54% increase in the five months since North said Apple was going down like Newton's apple, my question is: does anyone take Gary North seriously anymore?

Source: http://fauxcapitalist.com/2012/03/15/shades-of-y2k-gary-norths-bogus-apple-prediction/

It’s now 12 years, 2 months and 15 days after Gary North’s apocalyptic Y2K predictions failed to materialize, and not many days after that since he scrubbed all references to it from his website, GaryNorth.com.

Thankfully, there is archive.org, which shows his Chicken Little fear-mongering in all its glory.

On October 11, 2011, North took the opportunity of Steve Jobs’ untimely passing to spout off on how Apple’s fortunes were tied to that of Newton’s apple, and that both were inevitably going down.

The closing price on Apple shares the day before his article was $388.81 USD per share.

As of March 15, 2012, in anticipation of the new iPad 3, Apple shares traded at over $600 per share — a 54% increase in just five months since his bogus prediction.

Indeed, Apple stock will eventually go down from its Steve Jobs-era high. North didn’t put a date to his prediction, but such a huge increase in such a short time effectively shatters his prediction.

Less than two full months after his article, he wrote another one, saying:

“I have always suspected it. Apple as a company is over-hyped. The company’s new iPad users’ support strategy proves it.“

He then went on to complain about his customer experience, and admits:

“Do I have a bad attitude? No doubt. But it is in response to what I regard as a customer-insulting company.“

Yes, they are such a customer-insulting company, that consumers continue to turn out in droves for Apple’s smartphones and tablets, instead of RIM’s, whose market share has massively tanked.

For more on Gary North, see my articles:

1) Gary North runs for cover as his fool’s gold standard gets ever wider exposure

2) In claiming the Bible is anti-socialist, Gary North overlooks a blatant example of its socialism

3) Gary North’s free market gold standard is also a fool’s gold standard

4) Gary North praises Wal-Mart’s low prices despite some of it coming at the expense of taxpayers

5) Gary North: Spokesman for a major Federal Reserve bankster smokescreen

6) Cheerleader for bankster economics

7) Gary North admits gold was a bad investment from 1980-2001

8) Gary North claims gold coins produced by U.S. and Canada aren’t money, despite being legal tender

9) 21 years a medium-term investment? If you’re a gold bug, it is

Gold Money Power to the People-----Gary North

http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north821.html
 
Can you post at least one article wherein he did that? I did a Google search on his site for any references to Y2K, and it only came back with 8 hits, and none of them make reference to an apology.

This appeared in one of his newsletters in 2000:

“Clearly, as of this week,I was wrong in my predictions. ... I will now pay a price. I do apologize if I have embarrassed you or made your life worse. ... I believed that Y2K would create havoc. It still might, depending on how many bugs are still in the systems, but I will not here appeal to the ‘still might’ argument. So, let me say without hesitation that my predictions did not come true. The events did not take place. ... So, at this point in the aftermath of the rollover, I look foolish. I was prepared for this. I thought it was better to risk my reputation or credibility in a life-saving effort than to tell people, ‘yes, Y2K will cause problems,’ and then refuse to define what degree of problems and what to prepare for.”

http://www.pfo.org/y2k-bust.htm
 
Back
Top