Not really. Abortion is kind of an up for debate issue, but there are a LOT of libertarians who agree with Ron Paul on the issue and are pro-life. Gay marriage is also tricky because the libertarian view is complete separation of marriage and state, and until we get there, what exactly to do RIGHT NOW is tricky. Civil unions are kind of a no-brainer to me, even though I personally don't agree with their lifestyle, but gay marriage is trickier. Justin Raimondo is a libertarian homosexual who's against it. I don't personally think the government should be redefining terms like this, and I'm not the only libertarian who thinks this.
Drugs, prostitution, those types of freedom issues... Dems are generally against them. They're generally fails on the Patriot Act or TSA and stuff. They're generally against gun rights.
Yeah, basically.
I agree with you on the other stuff, but you can't just casually throw abortion in there. Some of us really do believe abortion is murder and therefore a violation of the NAP. Ron Paul agrees with us. That one isn't even settled among libertarians, even though the LP stupidly pretends like it is.
Obama may well have been better than any of the Republicans except for Ron Paul and Gary Johnson (Both of whom were MILLIONS of times better than Obama, and Ron Paul was in turn a million times better than Gary Johnson) if only because his foreign policy was less jingoistic, but he's still terrible.
As a TACTICAL matter, however, Republican rhetoric is more inclined towards limited government, so its easier to use genuine libertarian rhetoric in that party. What the GOP SAYS is closer to that, even though what they DO is not.
Democrats aren't always high on civil liberties and anti-war positions either. It all depends.
More importantly, just don't vote for bad GOP candidates, whatever party you're in.