Do you believe in science?

Do you believe in science?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 7.1%
  • No

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • Science does not care if I believe.

    Votes: 9 64.3%

  • Total voters
    14
That would be impossible, since belief in the Creator is an axiom on which science depends.

To the contrary -- such an assumption is unnecessary, as illustrated by this famous apocryphal story:

Laplace [Pierre-Simon, marquis de Laplace (1749 – 1827, a French mathematical physicist] presented his definitive work on the properties of the solar system to Napoleon. Napoleon, liking to embarrass people, asked Laplace if it was true that there was no mention of the solar system’s Creator (ie God) in his opus magus. Laplace, on this occasion at least, was not obsequious and replied, “I had no need of that hypothesis.”..

Laplace was not just a whistlin’ Dixie. Newton had needed that hypothesis, ie God, to make the solar system work. Newton believed that the planetary orbits were unstable and unless God intervened periodically, the planets would wander off into space. Newton had not done the mathematical analysis sufficiently completely. Laplace rectified the problem. Newton also had no model for the origin of the solar system. Laplace eliminated these two gaps that Newton had God fill.

Back to Napoleon—he told Joseph Lagrange (1736 – 1813), another of the great French mathematicians/physicists, Laplace’s comment about no need for the God hypothesis. Lagrange’s reply was, “Ah, it is a fine hypothesis; it explains many things.” Laplace’s apocryphal reply was, “This hypothesis, Sir, explains in fact everything, but does not permit to predict anything. As a scholar, I must provide you with works permitting predictions.” This is the ultimate insult in science: it explains everything but predicts nothing.
http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2011/09/16/there-is-no-need-for-god-as-a-hypothesis/
 
Back
Top